Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Zac Stacy is an example of how poorly managed our Rb contracts are.

90 posts in this topic

Posted

Should we mention that San Fran and Seattle both have highly paid running backs?

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

There is a reason we got Kenjon Barner on the cheap, we are preparing for life after them.

 

Also people need to stop using guy's who slipped through the cracks as "rules". If anyone knew how good Stacy or Alfred Morris were, they would not have slipped that far.  Just like how everyone complains about skipping over Richard Sherman now that they see what he can do, when 31 other teams skipped over him 5+ times.  Same goes for Tom Brady, who would have been the #1 overall pick.  

7 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If we make it to play them in the playoffs you'll be glad we have Williams, Stewart, Tolbert and not Zac fugin Stacey

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Breaking news here guys. Never thought of this before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

"Insert obligatory Hurney sucks, Deangelo sucks, and Stewart sucks angry rant".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Should we mention that San Fran and Seattle both have highly paid running backs?

We are paying both of our guys as much as those two make.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Oh yes, because Stacy is such a better back than Stewart. Sorry, 10 times out of 10, I'm rolling with J-Stew over a fifth rounder who had one great game against a suspect run defense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Most of the top teams have good RBs if they don't have a super elite QB

 

Indy- Richardson

KC- Charles

Hawks- Lynch

San Fran- Gore

Cincy- Bernard and Green-Ellis

GB- Lacy

 

Sure, if you have Peyton or Brees or Brady or Rodgers, then RBs are pretty much inconsequential.  For the rest of the football playing world you need good RBs to be successful.

 

Does anyone remember how much better we were when we replaced Foster with Williams??

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

We are paying both of our guys as much as those two make.

 

Sure, but the point by the OP is that we shouldn't pay either RB that much because some 5th round pick is having a good game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

There is a reason we got Kenjon Barner on the cheap, we are preparing for life after them.

 

Also people need to stop using guy's who slipped through the cracks as "rules". If anyone knew how good Stacy or Alfred Morris were, they would not have slipped that far.  Just like how everyone complains about skipping over Richard Sherman now that they see what he can do, when 31 other teams skipped over him 5+ times.  Same goes for Tom Brady, who would have been the #1 overall pick.  

 

Greg Hardy would be top 5 pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Thats cause they dont have a QB. Bad example. Move along.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Shame on the op

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites