Jump to content





Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Expect a HUGE game from Smitty Monday night...


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
86 replies to this topic

#76 BigEric

BigEric

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 14-February 12
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 141
  • Reputation: 54
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2013 - 04:35 PM

He's faced Talib twice a season for a few seasons and he excels vs bigger receivers. I'm feelin good about that matchup.

#77 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,262
  • Reputation: 5,361
Moderators

Posted 12 November 2013 - 04:46 PM

I don't think Talib is a shadow one receiver type CB. Doesn't he stay on one side in their base defense? I could be wrong but I thought at least in TB he stayed on the left only.


He is in NE now. Belichick does whatever. He shadowed a TE all game the other day.

#78 Kuechly59

Kuechly59

    Bow before GETTLEMAN

  • Joined: 27-October 13
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,067
  • Reputation: 556
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2013 - 09:24 PM

Aqib Talib is Prime Time this year, Steve Smith will not get anything. Alfonzo Dennard on the other side is no cake walk either


Lmao Check some highlights Talib is Smiths bitch.

If I were you I would be more concerned about your run defense...

#79 DaCityKats

DaCityKats

    feed KB 2014

  • Joined: 11-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 9,147
  • Reputation: 1,167
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2013 - 09:31 PM

Talib is in a better scheme in NE that allows him to press and play man coverage (his strength) on WR compared to cover 2. I look for smitty to be average or less. Talib has been shadowing the #1 passing threat up until his injury.

#80 ladypanther

ladypanther

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: 5,336
  • Reputation: 1,608
SUPPORTER

Posted 12 November 2013 - 09:34 PM

I would love for Smitty to have a big game.  You know he has to be mad at himself for the drops.  A mad Smitty is a good Smitty.

 

By the way, we have seen drops this year, but have not seen them 2 games in a row.



#81 benz0

benz0

    Member

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 179
  • Reputation: 57
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2013 - 09:46 PM

I feel it coming as well, 89 is still my boy! Lost a step or two, or three, as mention tons of time, but ole faithful still has that fire! 

 



#82 Cpt slay a ho

Cpt slay a ho

    Lord Flacko

  • Joined: 27-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,509
  • Reputation: 537
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2013 - 10:02 PM

Dude, when you keep a team's #1 passing option to 50 yards or less and usually no TD.... that is shutting him down lol.  He definitely has had drops but the guy just isn't elite anymore, on a consistent basis.  I can't wait till we get Cam a legit #1 WR, we'll really see how he can play.   

 

For one example, Reavis basically shut down Smith in the Tampa Game.

 

Smith can still have a nice clutch catch (after dropping a couple earlier) but he hasn't gone off in a while.   We shouldn't expect him to.  it's stupid he's our #1 anyway, we should have someone else in there taking up that role by now.

 

that's the problem you guys are expecting smith to blast off for a 100 yards or near it every game when in fact his production like i stated previously has drop because he himself throw in that ginn,lafell, and olsen are all contributing equally. Don't get me wrong he's not the same SS from 05 and we do need to draft a replacement next year but i think some of you guys overblow the whole smitty thing, guy is still the heart of our offense, hell the team. What he brings to the table cannot be replace easily but saying he's lost a step because he drops the ball more then usually is beyond me, he's still getting good separation.



#83 Kuech the Sneak

Kuech the Sneak

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 16-October 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,675
  • Reputation: 1,072
HUDDLER

Posted 12 November 2013 - 10:04 PM

Talib might be back, so doubtful

#84 General_Purr

General_Purr

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 22-September 13
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 948
  • Reputation: 176
HUDDLER

Posted 13 November 2013 - 02:24 AM

If Talib is there he wont. But if he is on fire he will. 



#85 Squirrel

Squirrel

    Drink a beer and relax

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • posts: 13,681
  • Reputation: 1,277
SUPPORTER

Posted 13 November 2013 - 05:08 AM

Im more worried Cam wont play good than Smitty going off.



#86 SauceBoss

SauceBoss

    IT IS WHAT IT IS

  • Joined: 20-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,294
  • Reputation: 356
HUDDLER

Posted 13 November 2013 - 05:19 AM

Rather than Smitty, I can see Ginn having a huge game. As long as Cam can actually get some time to settle and make a deep throw.



#87 jtm

jtm

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 17-March 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,754
  • Reputation: 201
HUDDLER

Posted 13 November 2013 - 07:45 AM

With our offense, we really don't need any of our WRs to go off. Instead, we just need everyone to catch the ball which has been a problem. Truth be told, Ginn and Olson present our biggest match up advantages (other than our RBs). I love Smitty, but he is really a possession type receiver now.