Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Panther_Brotherhood

A Tale of Two Cams

11 posts in this topic

http://www.reddit.com/r/panthers/comments/1qgmof/a_tale_of_two_cams_ver_20_week_10_cam_analysis/

 

(not my article)

 

 

Cam Newton didn't hang his head after starting off 2-11/13 Yds and just throwing an INT. He picked it back up and led the team down the field for the only TD of the game. That's a Cam we haven't seen before this season. In fact, Cam put up numbers that were higher than his season average to that point. If you were to take his numbers after the INT and project them across a whole game, you'd hit his average of about 225 yards. Cam didn't have a bad day yesterday, Cam had a bad quarter.

 

 

I know it's reddit and not a major outlet, but this guy puts up some interesting info, and good insight. 

He also puts up analysis of Cam like this regularly after games.

 

 

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- This is why coaches like to watch film before fully evaluating a player's performance. 

 
Statistically, Carolina Panthers quarterback Cam Newton had a bad day in Sunday's 10-9 victory over the San Francisco 49ers. 
 
His passer rating was 52.7, well below his average of 93.1 coming into the game and worse than all but one game this season. He completed only 50 percent of his passes, again way below the 64.4 success rate through eight games. 
 
But when you consider the way Newton managed the game, the mistakes made around him and the way he came up with big plays when the Panthers (6-3) needed them the most, it wasn't nearly so bad. 
 
"Figures lie and liars figure,'' coach Ron Rivera said. "You can look at the numbers all you want. Put the tape on and see what happened. See how many times the ball got tipped, how many times the ball got dropped, how many times he overthrew it. 
 
"He didn't play a bad game. I mean it, too.'' 
 
Offensive coordinator Mike Shula and quarterback coach Ken Dorsey concurred. 
 
"He's the quarterback, and we all know the quarterback is going to get a lot more credit and a lot more blame during wins and losses, or production or lack of,'' Shula said. 
 
"In the passing game, we were just a little bit off, whether it was throws or catches or protection.'' 
 
Rivera counted three dropped passes, and suspects there were a couple more. He counted several balls that were tipped at the line of scrimmage. He pointed to several breakdowns on the offensive line, a big one resulting in an 8-yard loss two plays before Graham Gano kicked the game-winning 53-yard field goal. 
 
The play before the field goal is one of those that impressed Rivera. Newton under pressure threw a short pass to Steve Smith for 6 yards that put Gano within field goal range. 
 
Rivera also noted the 9-yard pass to Smith on third-and-8 that allowed the Panthers to run the clock under two minutes before San Francisco regained possession. 
 
"That dump-off pass to Steve that put us in field goal position was huge,'' River said. "I don't get it, but that's [final statistics] what people are going to see and people are going to say. We're not going to worry about that. 
 
"We're going to worry about how we do things here and the things we need to do to give ourselves a chance to win.'' 
 
Newton gave the Panthers a chance to win.

Another article

 

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/2019/newtons-game-not-as-bad-as-stats-indicate

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If that was Luck, the media would be all over his jock claiming "nothing doesn't phase him."

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've already said this, Cam's boxscore looks terrible but he played really really well after those first few drives.

 

He did what he needed to and generally made smart choices.  His receivers dropped some balls (happens a lot to us it seems) but overall he made the throws when it counted most.

 

Cam's 3rd down play was absolutely spectacular and I think a lot of people, even those giving us props in the national media, haven't really seen that yet.  Just wait.  They'll realize soon.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PFF graded Cam positively for his passing in this game. It was his rushing grade (probably counting the fumble against him) that dinged his overall grade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he did exactly what i said he'd do, which was do what he did against atl and come out a little shaky/excited/nervous and make some dumb mistakes, but then settle down and find his groove.

 

once he did, he wasn't bad at all. the rest of the game he threw 21 times and had 14 completions. that's 66% which is a bit above average, iirc. and 156 yards for those three quarters isn't horrible, but it could have been better...esp. if the WRs hadn't been dropping balls.

 

it wasn't one of his best games, but overall it definitely wasn't one of his worst.

 

of course you have to also consider who he was playing...one of the top 3 or 4 Ds in the league and playing them in their house with their noise. that isn't a great situation to be throwing in. sure, a couple others have done ok there but that doesn't matter. all that matters is that the offense gave us just what we needed to win when we needed it and the defense made it easy. both sides of the ball bail each other out when they need it and that is what makes a great team.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PFF graded Cam positively for his passing in this game. It was his rushing grade (probably counting the fumble against him) that dinged his overall grade.

I'm not sure if I can trust PFF anymore, they gave Star a really bad grade and in the refocused review praised Joe Staley while not even mentioning our pass-rush. That was definitely biased grading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even Jaws acknowledged that 3rd-and-8 play on ESPN yesterday. He called it a big boy/elite throw.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if I can trust PFF anymore, they gave Star a really bad grade and in the refocused review praised Joe Staley while not even mentioning our pass-rush. That was definitely biased grading.

The grade star got was surprising

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Posts

    • i want my organs with me when i board the spaceship to the planet Zebulon

      Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

    • i dont get this on the app

      Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

    • http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article149026764.html Graphic photos stir doubts about Darren Rainey’s ‘accidental’ prison death The photographs of Darren Rainey’s body are difficult to look at: skin curling from nearly every part of his body, from the top of his nose to his ankles. Large swaths of exposed body tissue, some of it blood red, and other portions straw yellow. Skin blistering on portions of his face, his ears and his neck. Deep red tissue exposed on his chest, his back, a thigh and an arm. Yellow tissue exposed on his buttocks and left leg. About the only portion of his body not affected are his feet. Paramedic Alexander Lopez saw the injuries firsthand that evening, after Rainey collapsed and died in a shower in the mental health unit at Dade Correctional Institution on Jan. 23, 2012. “[Patient] was found with second- and third-degree burns on 30 percent of his body,” Lopez wrote, adding that prison staff told him that “inmate was found on shower floor with hot water running.” The autopsy report, which inexplicably took three years to be completed and another year to be released, was puzzling to Rainey’s relatives, who said they were pressured by prison officials to immediately have him cremated. ... Fernández Rundle issued a final report on the case on March 17, announcing her decision not to file charges. She conducted the investigation after the Miami Herald reported that the makeshift shower had been used by guards to torment prisoners who suffered from mental illnesses. Unlike other showers in the prison, it was rigged so that the temperature controls were in an adjacent room, inaccessible to inmates locked inside. Inmates in the unit told the Herald — and later detectives — that Rainey had been placed in the shower by officer Roland Clarke after Rainey defecated on himself, and that other officers stood by as Rainey screamed and begged for help while banging on the shower door. He was found face up, in a pool of water, more than 90 minutes later.   Inmates and staff described how after Rainey was carried out of the shower, he was so red he looked like he had been “boiled’’ — and that his skin was peeling off his body “like fruit roll-ups.” ... Fernández Rundle said the absence of burns made it impossible to prove that a crime had been committed, since it meant the shower was not dangerously hot. She emphasized that “science” showed that Rainey did not die from the actions of the corrections officers. However, Marraccini and Baden both told the Herald the photos indicate burns over a significant portion of Rainey’s body. Marraccini, former medical examiner in Palm Beach County, faulted the Miami-Dade medical examiner for not taking additional skin tissue samples, since it is important to look at skin tissue from the area that suffered the most damage. The Herald asked Lew to indicate from where on Rainey’s anatomy she took the skin tissue sample. It was one of the questions she did not answer. ... Grimes, who declined to comment for this story, has suggested that police and state attorney investigators gave too much weight to corrections officers’ statements and not enough to the broader context — including evidence that the temperature of the rigged shower was a dangerous 160 degrees when turned on full hot — and that corrections officers had been abusing mentally ill prisoners for years. Among other things, the Herald has found the following problems with the state attorney’s (SAO) review of Rainey’s death: The SAO said a paramedic on the scene, Alexander Lopez, “noted that there were no signs of trauma on Rainey’s body …” In fact, Lopez, who examined Rainey’s body, did not mention in his report if there were or weren’t signs of trauma. But he did write that Rainey “was found with second- and third-degree burns on approximately 30 percent of his body.” The state attorney also failed to mention that Brittany McLaurin, an investigator with the medical examiner’s office, wrote in a report the day after Rainey’s death: “Visible trauma was noticed throughout the decedent’s body.” The SAO dismisses a finding by the prison health and safety inspector, Darlene Dixon, that the hot water in the shower tested at 160 degrees, far higher than is safe. Dixon took the reading two days after Rainey’s death. The state attorney said the reading was questionable for two reasons: Dixon used a meat thermometer and another staff member measured the water at 120 degrees earlier the same day. In fact, the Herald has learned, Dixon not only told investigators that the shower tested at 160 degrees when on full-hot, but that she had previously put in work orders on multiple occasions asking that the unsafe situation be fixed. Detectives and the state attorney failed to explore or even mention that in the final report.