Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

From the latest ESPN mag....

37 posts in this topic

Posted

I'd take Wilson and Cam before Luck. Luck looks and talks like a fuging neanderthal. fug it I'll take the second place then but under no circumstance would I want that as the face of any franchise I'm a fan of.

 

The colts had a fuging horse faced guy as their QB for a little over a decade.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I never understand the hate for Luck on this board.  He is a great young qb, along with Cam. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I would think skill positions don't want to give up their touches to Cam. He's scored over 20 rushing TDs and 1700 yards rushing in the past three years. Those guys are thinking Luck will get them the ball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

His post made sense to the literate among us.

Hatter is a weak troll.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I refuse to care about who ranks what Qb where.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So 4 QB's are the Top 3 young qb's? Lol

Numbers must not be your friends...lol

Just giving you a hard time, but it was funny

 

You seriously can't count to three?

 

1. Cam

2. Russell Wilson

3. Luck

 

What was so funny about him listing three young QBs as his top three young QBs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

 

IMHO - Cam, Russell Wilson, and Luck are the top three young QBs

 

So 4 QB's are the Top 3 young qb's? Lol

Numbers must not be your friends...lol

Just giving you a hard time, but it was funny

 

 

IMHO is not a QB. Cam, Wilson, and Luck are. 3 QBs.

 

IMHO is an acronym for "In My Humble Opinion".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

it's the exciting comeback wins that they should never have had to come behind from if he and the defense had gotten their job done early.

he has a lot of come from behind wins because they are always playing from behind.

Luck has been Tebowish in the first half of a few games this year

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Luck is the reason the Colts had any success last year and the only reason the Colts have had any success this year after the Colts being the worst team in the league 2 years ago with Painter.

Much like when we got Cam he was pretty much solely responsible from a 4 game win increase in 2011. Cam and Luck are the best young QB's Wilson too, he can win games. Luck is a guy who can rally the troops and single handily boost everyone's morale, players want to play for guys like that.

Cam has that in him too, its coming.

Your statement about Luck shows how much the media influences our thinking. U seriously believe that the Colts were as bad as the Panthers during Cam's first season?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So folks believe Cam would make a better LB and Luck gets 54% for the QB folks would take as a starter for their team. Clearly not much has changed in how some view these qbs. But they are getting assistant from the media and their desire to feed the thinking of some.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Your statement about Luck shows how much the media influences our thinking. U seriously believe that the Colts were as bad as the Panthers during Cam's first season?

 

Luck threw 627 times and Cam threw 517 rookie seasons but yet Cam was only a little bit behind in total pass yardage. Luck had Vick fuging Ballard, RG3 had a 1500 yard guy with AM in the backfield tell me again how RGbitch won ROY over Luck again? Luck was asked to do WAY more with LESS than any other rookie QB last year.

 

Hilton with Wayne certainly helped but he still had no run game and was asked to throw a ton every game that's the only way the Colts were winning any games, through the arm of Luck.

 

Of course the Colts were as bad as the Panthers Cams first season. Both had no defense. Cam had Olsen and Shockey at least and a good run game with d will and stew + the extreme effectiveness of his own legs and size.

 

Cam and Luck both came into shot situations, and Cam and Luck are both the reasons why the Panthers and Colts are back on the radar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

So folks believe Cam would make a better LB and Luck gets 54% for the QB folks would take as a starter for their team. Clearly not much has changed in how some view these qbs. But they are getting assistant from the media and their desire to feed the thinking of some.

 

I will say this, at least 2 or 3 wasnt RGKnee. . like it has been up until now.  I'll take any spot for Cam on that top 3. The only thing I take out of it is that dudes want to play with Cam, period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites