still no love for lafell?
Posted 19 November 2013 - 05:36 AM
Posted 19 November 2013 - 05:56 AM
Whatever else you may think of him, he stepped up when we needed him to tonight. Props for that, at least!
Posted 19 November 2013 - 05:58 AM
l,,, trolllooollooooloooll!! hahahahhahahaha trooolllll looolll looollll.. bitch
Posted 19 November 2013 - 06:32 AM
He's legit. We are no longer surprised when he performs well. Instead, we expect him to do so.
It's a strange feeling. More than one WR on the team. It only took us 8+ years.
Posted 19 November 2013 - 06:48 AM
He is what he is (am I allowed to say that?). He's a good possession receiver that can move the chains but isn't a game breaker. I definitely appreciate him though.
Posted 19 November 2013 - 07:06 AM
Posted 19 November 2013 - 09:33 AM
Still need to pick a WR in the first round of the draft. Hopefully there's a good one at pick 32
Posted 19 November 2013 - 09:37 AM
He is definitely a number 2 receiver who is well worth keeping. He was clutch in this game.
Posted 19 November 2013 - 09:44 AM
Gone after this year.
At the start of the year and after the Zona game I would have agreed. However, LaFell has built a good rapport with Newton. I think it's a toss up on LaFell or Olsen being Cam's fav target.
Carolina has tried to keep Cam comfortable with keeping Shula around as OC because they didn't want to change alot on Cam. I think the same applies when it comes to LaFell, assuming he understands his value and doesn't expect a huge contract.
Posted 19 November 2013 - 09:49 AM
I agree with this comparison.
My fav Lafell play from last night was that 5 yarder he caught once Cam rolled out, and then just fell back and didn't try to do too much. Last week the same thing happened and LaFell dropped the ball because he was thinking about turning it up field instead of catching it. Same thing in Zona as well on the fourth down play. The play last night showed me he has learned from the 2 previous errors on very similar plays.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users