Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Newton Blog; Smith on Chud (again)

51 posts in this topic

Posted

Smitty needs some stats.....

 

He needs postseason stats and a ring.  Regular season stats at this point don't mean much for having a shot at the HOF IMO..

 

The post season holds tremendous weight. That is the only reason wide receivers like John Stalworth and Lynn Swann are in the HOF. Super Bowls go a long way.  If those 2 never won a Super Bowl they would be "also rans" in the history of pro football. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Steve says a lot of things he probably shouldn't. What he said is true but is it really necessary to keep blasting your former coach publicly.

Steve is no longer a dominant player and it comes across as him not being able to accept himself as an average WR at age 34. It's like he has to give excuses as to why he is no longer putting up All Pro numbers.

However, the next day he'll go on the radio and talk about how he enjoys taking a back seat to the younger guys now and is just doing his part to help the team win.

Complete mind fug.

Disclaimer:

Before everyone comes running to call me an idiot and defend Steve like an overprotective mother, Steve Smith is, and will always be, my favorite athlete. I love that guy and want to see him finish his career here and play as long as he wants. He deserves a Super Bowl ring and I hope he gets one here. That said, he isn't perfect. He still says dumb stuff. Blast away.

You're an idiot. Go back to lurking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I love it. Can't wait when Cam can get applauded for saying things of that nature. Didn't Chud insinuate it was Cam's fault the team wasn't winning, I'm not sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

how larry gets in over smith i don't know.........different note smith gets open and separation lol he kills his own yardage when he does a half spin into 3 defenders lol plus he doesn't get as much targets

Numbers....Fitz's regular season numbers are better. Added bonus, Fitz owns the best single postseason numbers for any WR in NFL history.

How is 89 ahead?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Pretty much what Smith is saying is that Chud is all about chucking the ball down field irrespective if the OL and personnel are suited for it. Yes you can rack up a bunch of yards but you won't be winning much game. Pretty much summarize the 2011 and 2012 years for us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

When SS made that 4th and 10 reception and turned it into 19 yards, I looked for the average receiver but could not find it. Instead I saw the same old clutch receiver that's 99% reliable.

 

X-CLOWN BABY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

What really do pro players want out of the NFL?

 

Most who are accomplished have the money the need for the rest of life....................but they want two things out of their NFL career...

 

A SB ring(s) and a trip to the HOF......................and the fastest way to get to the HOF beyond your longevity and stats is to get to the SB and win.

 

Ask Dan Marino about the value of stats................

 

Ask Terry Bradshaw about the value of SB rings................

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Numbers....Fitz's regular season numbers are better. Added bonus, Fitz owns the best single postseason numbers for any WR in NFL history.

How is 89 ahead?

 

idk about that as of lately fitz has been human since warner left, still a very good wr but he's is dealing with what smitty has had to deal will 09 until 11, how is smith not ahead? were posed to make a playoff run in smiths last couple years here,idk about fitz situation he might not be a cardinal next year and who knows what team he lands on......for both it will come down to the next 3 years IMO......if fitz gets on a team with a very good qb he'll most likely walk in the HOF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

idk about that as of lately fitz has been human since warner left, still a very good wr but he's is dealing with what smitty has had to deal will 09 until 11, how is smith not ahead? were posed to make a playoff run in smiths last couple years here,idk about fitz situation he might not be a cardinal next year and who knows what team he lands on......for both it will come down to the next 3 years IMO......if fitz gets on a team with a very good qb he'll most likely walk in the HOF.

Current Standings (Keep in my Fitzgerald is presently 4 years younger

 

TDs

Fitzgerald - 13th 

Smith - 42nd 

 

Yards -

Smith -20th 

Fitzgerald - 29th 

 

Rec - 

Smith -25th 

Fitzgerald - 26th 

 

TD gap, age, and on top of that Fitzgerald owns the greatest statistical  postseason by a WR.  Fitzgerald is ahead of 89.

 

89 needs to pad his postseason at this stage to get in (regular season he won't get ahead of Fitz unless Fitz gets hurt)...Fitz's statistical pace is great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Steve is so much more than the hot head the media sometimes makes him out to be. He's a rare leader at WR you can't say that about guys like T.O. or Chad Johnson that blew up locker room after locker room trying to get back the stats they had in their glory days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Steve is so much more than the hot head the media sometimes makes him out to be. He's a rare leader at WR you can't say that about guys like T.O. or Chad Johnson that blew up locker room after locker room trying to get back the stats they had in their glory days.

I don't think Chad Johnson belongs in the same sentence as TO.  He wasn't a locker room cancer.....he just lost his skills.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I don't think Chad Johnson belongs in the same sentence as TO.  He wasn't a locker room cancer.....he just lost his skills.

 

That's fair. He was just a distraction. No one is on the same level as TO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites