Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Top 25 WR in College Football

16 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

Found this a few minutes ago. its on bleacher report so I know some might not like it but none the less I understand the importance of getting a WR this draft in the 1st round so I decided to share.

 

Let me know how you agree or disagree on rankings and why

 

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1839327-br-cfb-250-top-24-wide-receivers-in-college-football/page/2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Benjamin 24th, Watkins 10th? wut

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

This is all kinds of fucked up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Though I'm not a Kelvin Benjamin homer, he's better than #24. I'd put him closer to #7 and Watkins around #4 with Mike Evans at #1.

 

I'm not a big Odell Beckham fan, this writer must be a LSU homer with two LSU WR's in the top 4. Probably the most intriguing WR in the class to me after Evans is Allen Robinson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Yeah, I don't even understand this. I'm not the hugest Benjamin fan, but 24th? C'mon. I'd say he's definitely Top 10.

 

Also, ODB #1? Lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

So what would be your top ten guys? I'm trying to catch more games so I can see these kids play myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

My top ten:

1. Sammy Watkins
2. Mike Evans
3. Jordan Matthews
4. Allen Robinson
5. Kelvin Benjamin
6. Devin Street
7. Marquis Lee
8. Jeremy Gallon
9. Jarvis Landry
10. Brandin Cooks

I think 1 and 2 are clearly in a league of their own. 3-6 could be interchangeable. You're picking a guy for the system/where he wins.

I have marquis Lee at 7, but I think he could be in the 12-14 range when his career is done. He's a USC receiver. They don't work out.

8-10 are lumped together. Special teams players/system fits.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

My top ten:

1. Sammy Watkins
2. Mike Evans
3. Jordan Matthews
4. Allen Robinson
5. Kelvin Benjamin
6. Devin Street
7. Marquis Lee
8. Jeremy Gallon
9. Jarvis Landry
10. Brandin Cooks

I think 1 and 2 are clearly in a league of their own. 3-6 could be interchangeable. You're picking a guy for the system/where he wins.

I have marquis Lee at 7, but I think he could be in the 12-14 range when his career is done. He's a USC receiver. They don't work out.

8-10 are lumped together. Special teams players/system fits.

Lulz, analysis....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

My top ten:

1. Sammy Watkins
2. Mike Evans
3. Jordan Matthews
4. Allen Robinson
5. Kelvin Benjamin
6. Devin Street
7. Marquis Lee
8. Jeremy Gallon
9. Jarvis Landry
10. Brandin Cooks

I think 1 and 2 are clearly in a league of their own. 3-6 could be interchangeable. You're picking a guy for the system/where he wins.

I have marquis Lee at 7, but I think he could be in the 12-14 range when his career is done. He's a USC receiver. They don't work out.

8-10 are lumped together. Special teams players/system fits.


Guys 6-10 over Moncrief?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Guys 6-10 over Moncrief?


I'm not the biggest fan of Moncrief. He could be awesome, but, I'm just by sure. Though, the third their guys 6-10 really don't have that much separation between them. There's a log jam there. So, you could probably easily fill him into that slot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I'm not the biggest fan of Moncrief. He could be awesome, but, I'm just by sure. Though, the third their guys 6-10 really don't have that much separation between them. There's a log jam there. So, you could probably easily fill him into that slot.


Just curious, why don't you like Moncrief?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Just curious, why don't you like Moncrief?


I think he's slower than people think he is and that's what's holding him back. I could very well be proved wrong, but I think at the combine he may run an electronic 4.65. The last I seen he has a hand times 4.49.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites