Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Chinese Scientist Proves The First Inhabitants Of China Were Black

14 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

Black Chinese
7289330_f520.jpg
 
 
Out Of Africa

Copyright 2012 VVeasey Publishing

10/21/12

For many years Black historians and Afrocentrists have said that the first inhabitants of China were black Africans.

"The Negroid races peopled at some time all the South of India, Indo-China and China. The South of Indo-China actually has now pure Negritos as the Semangs and mixed as the Malays and the Sakais."( H. Imbert, "Les Negritos de la Chine").

“Even the sacred Manchu dynasty shows this Negro strain. The lower part of the face of the Emperor Pu-yi of Manchukuo, direct descendant of the Manchu rulers of China, is most distinctly Negroid. Chinese chroniclers report that a Negro Empire existed in the South of China at the dawn of that country's history".( Professor Chang Hsing-Lang , "The importation of Negro Slaves to China under the Tang Dynasty A.D. 618-907)

 

But after hundreds of years of the worldwide spread of the doctrine of white superiority and the inferiority of black Africans and their descendants. This notion that blacks were the original inhabitants of China was poo, pooed by white scientists and others and even by some blacks.

But in 2005, a Chinese DNA specialist, Jin Li, leading a team of Chinese and other scientists, proved through DNA tests that indeed the first inhabitants of China were black Africans.

 

The DNA Evidence

Li said he was trying to prove that the Chinese evolved from homo erectus independently of all other humans. He collected DNA samples from 165 different ethnic groups and over 12000 samples in China and Asia to test his theory. Li said he was taught through China’s education system that there was something special about Chinese, and because he was Chinese, he was hoping to prove that the Chinese developed independently of all other humans.

But surprise, surprise, surprise, surprise that proved not to be true!

Li’s team focused on a single genetic marker that appeared about 80,000 years ago in Africa. Anyone carrying that marker would have recent African ancestors and could not be descended from the more ancient Homo Erectus. Li and his team found that early humans belonged to different species but modern humans descended from the East Africans species.

 

http://youtu.be/oQJzhFGuoHg

Check out his response in the video

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

lil wang 4 lyf

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

[yt]FPHTP40sWc4[/yt]

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Case closed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I can believe it.

The world has been around or so long, it's easy to get origins ands facts incorrect when trying to pit this impossible puzzle together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I think we all were black at one point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Now my insomnia has been cured.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Cool stuff, good to see another Chinese scientist coming around to mainstream views on this.  The first inhabitants of pretty much everywhere (but North America) were black according to the general hypotheses relating to out-of-Africa (or at least African, if not black specifically).

 

Out-of-Africa is really only disputed by decent scientists IN China, for the exact reason this guy says: the education system there basically teaches it.  More and more Chinese scientists are finding evidence that just isn't the case.

 

Anyway, onto how the H. sapiens that colonized pretty much everywhere were black... alternate skin pigmentation probably arose in northward moving populations 40,000 years ago, though this is under debate.  As people moved northward, the extra protection needed from darker skin pigments was less necessary and the advantages gained from greater vitamin d synthesis was selected for.  Another alternative explanation is that it arose roughly 6-12k years ago simultaneously in multiple populations, where due to agriculture more than northern latitudes, lighter pigment was needed to maximize synthesis of vitamin d due to a reduction in the amount of vitamin d gained from hunting due to changing diets.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Where else would the decendants of Bruce Leeroy of the Last Dragon be from! Sho nuff!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8C02RL6B1nM&feature=player_detailpage

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

lil wang 4 lyf


Little Wang indeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites