Jump to content
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Chinese Scientist Proves The First Inhabitants Of China Were Black

Recommended Posts

Black Chinese

Out Of Africa

Copyright 2012 VVeasey Publishing


For many years Black historians and Afrocentrists have said that the first inhabitants of China were black Africans.

"The Negroid races peopled at some time all the South of India, Indo-China and China. The South of Indo-China actually has now pure Negritos as the Semangs and mixed as the Malays and the Sakais."( H. Imbert, "Les Negritos de la Chine").

“Even the sacred Manchu dynasty shows this ***** strain. The lower part of the face of the Emperor Pu-yi of Manchukuo, direct descendant of the Manchu rulers of China, is most distinctly Negroid. Chinese chroniclers report that a ***** Empire existed in the South of China at the dawn of that country's history".( Professor Chang Hsing-Lang , "The importation of ***** Slaves to China under the Tang Dynasty A.D. 618-907)


But after hundreds of years of the worldwide spread of the doctrine of white superiority and the inferiority of black Africans and their descendants. This notion that blacks were the original inhabitants of China was poo, pooed by white scientists and others and even by some blacks.

But in 2005, a Chinese DNA specialist, Jin Li, leading a team of Chinese and other scientists, proved through DNA tests that indeed the first inhabitants of China were black Africans.


The DNA Evidence

Li said he was trying to prove that the Chinese evolved from homo erectus independently of all other humans. He collected DNA samples from 165 different ethnic groups and over 12000 samples in China and Asia to test his theory. Li said he was taught through China’s education system that there was something special about Chinese, and because he was Chinese, he was hoping to prove that the Chinese developed independently of all other humans.

But surprise, surprise, surprise, surprise that proved not to be true!

Li’s team focused on a single genetic marker that appeared about 80,000 years ago in Africa. Anyone carrying that marker would have recent African ancestors and could not be descended from the more ancient Homo Erectus. Li and his team found that early humans belonged to different species but modern humans descended from the East Africans species.


Check out his response in the video


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now my insomnia has been cured.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool stuff, good to see another Chinese scientist coming around to mainstream views on this.  The first inhabitants of pretty much everywhere (but North America) were black according to the general hypotheses relating to out-of-Africa (or at least African, if not black specifically).


Out-of-Africa is really only disputed by decent scientists IN China, for the exact reason this guy says: the education system there basically teaches it.  More and more Chinese scientists are finding evidence that just isn't the case.


Anyway, onto how the H. sapiens that colonized pretty much everywhere were black... alternate skin pigmentation probably arose in northward moving populations 40,000 years ago, though this is under debate.  As people moved northward, the extra protection needed from darker skin pigments was less necessary and the advantages gained from greater vitamin d synthesis was selected for.  Another alternative explanation is that it arose roughly 6-12k years ago simultaneously in multiple populations, where due to agriculture more than northern latitudes, lighter pigment was needed to maximize synthesis of vitamin d due to a reduction in the amount of vitamin d gained from hunting due to changing diets.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites