Jump to content

- - - - -

Breaking Bad ?

  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#16 Chimera



  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,232 posts

Posted 05 January 2014 - 11:48 PM

Again....and again.... 26 soldiers had charges brought against them for their roles. Whether via Courts-Martial, NJP or other judicial processes, none of the 25 remaining were convicted.

"Twenty six soldiers were charged with criminal offenses, but only Second Lieutenant William Calley Jr., a platoon leader in C Company, was convicted. Found guilty of killing 22 villagers, he was originally given a life sentence, but served only three and a half years under house arrest."

And I'm tired of arguing a point with which you have no real life experience and nothing beyond an idealist opinion about.

Where does the "I was only following orders" come into play?
One enlisted Soldier was shown to have participated with the lieutenant in mass murder of civilians and detainees. That one Soldier was granted immunity.

Again, the Nuremberg Principles are DOD policy. Can you refute that? Or is it better to admit defeat with another round of insults, sailor.

#17 Anybodyhome


    USN Retired

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,159 posts
  • LocationWherever I May Roam

Posted 06 January 2014 - 10:28 AM



On November 24, 1969, Lt. Gen. W.R. Peers was directed by the Secretary of the Army to review “possible supression or witholding of information by persons involved in the incident." After more than 26,000 pages of testimony from 403 witnesses were gathered, the Peers inquiry recommended that charges should be brought against 28 officers and two non-commissioned officers involved in a cover-up of the massacre.


In the end, Army lawyers decided that only 14 officers should be charged with crimes. Meanwhile, a separate investigation by the Army’s Criminal Investigation Division concluded that there was evidence to charge 30 soldiers with the crimes of murder, rape, sodomy, and mutilation. Seventeen men had left the Army, and charges against them were dropped.


Army investigators concluded that 33 of the 105 members of Charlie Company participated in the massacre, and that 28 officers helped cover it up. Charges were brought against only 13 men. In the end, only one soldier – Lt. William Calley - was convicted. Calley was charged with murdering 104 villagers in the My Lai massacre.

#18 Chimera



  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,232 posts

Posted 06 January 2014 - 10:59 AM

Yes, nobody is denying a cover up.

Calley was in charge of a *platoon*. He was not in charge of either all of Charlie Company or any of it's other platoons.
In Calley's *platoon*, to whom he gave unlawful orders, only one Soldier is known to have followed his orders. Several were known to flat out refuse.

Others may have committed war crimes. But when he gave the order to kill detainees and children, only one complied.

What happened within the rest of C Co does not apply to Calley as the other platoons had their own butterbars.

You and I both know the UCMJ's jurisdiction does not end at separation. Let's not pretend the My Lai case is a textbook example of how the military works.

#19 venom



  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,925 posts
  • LocationPleiades

Posted 06 January 2014 - 01:27 PM

F*ck the military. Half the time it seems like it serves an excuse for demented people to run amuck.

#20 Chimera



  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,232 posts

Posted 07 January 2014 - 12:54 AM

I guess, if you believe in reptilian overlords and thermite demolitions

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com