Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

g5jamz

Today marks the 50th anniversary of the "War on Poverty"

6 posts in this topic

My personal opinion is that the war on drugs seriously impeded any potential of a successful poverty fix

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

g5 can you provide an ounce of commentary to show you can do something more than copy and paste links you saw mentioned on drudge, free beacon, nat review, and the blaze? please?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

g5 can you provide an ounce of commentary to show you can do something more than copy and paste links you saw mentioned on drudge, free beacon, nat review, and the blaze? please?

 

I post things sometimes in order to spark discussion.  I was seeing if the words "war on poverty" would get some commentary going since the "war on" moniker is so similar to the "war on drugs" and it's judged failings simply over things like monetary cost. 

 

Was the war won? 

 

Is the war something that can be won?

 

Do you have to be spoon-fed what to think or present a side in order to browbeat or ridicule opposing views?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it was more successful than the war on drugs

 

 

 

  • In 1960, one in three children lived in poverty.
  • In 1940, one American child in ten did not live with either birth parent. Today the figure is one in twenty-five.
  • In the mid-1950s, 25% of the population lived below the poverty line.
  • In 1958, 60% of the population over sixty-five had incomes below $1,000.
  • n the 1950s, one-third of the white, native-born families could not get by with the income of only one working parent.
  • In the 1950s, racism was deeply institutionalized. 50% of black families lived below the poverty line; migrant workers suffered appalling working and living conditions; people of color were not permitted to take part in the American dream.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Civilian Conservation Corps helped break the cycle of poverty and improve our lands.  Is it time to bring it back?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You do realize no one wanted RyanCare/ObamaCare Lite to pass, right? If anything, the media and democrats has made themselves absolute fools lately. STILL no evidence Trump colluded with Russia whatsoever, which is quite the funny irony in this whole conspiracy. Trump inherited a mess. Hard to fix this mess when you got crybaby globalists and dems everywhere.    
    • I hate this DG analogy so much.  It only makes sense in the context of an efficient market where teams are rational, have perfect information, and scouts are always right about players.  But we have ample evidence that is not the case.  Sometimes, talented players just don't work out.  Injuries derail careers.  Teams make oddball picks.  Sometimes, you are just wrong about a player (see Ealy, Kony). I like him a lot, but DG's habit of always trading up / never trading down may ultimately be his downfall in CAR.  It results in a lack of depth across the roster and it makes your roster very vulnerable to i) injuries (see 2015 vs. 2016) and ii) missing on evals.  If we missed on Funchess (jury still out), that hurts - but missing on Funchess when you traded multiple picks to get him compounds the issue. Trading up and trading down are both valid strategies - but I'd suggest balancing the two strategies would improve your chances of long-term success.