Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Of Steve Smith, Teddy Ginn and Brandon Lafell


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 CelibatePimp

CelibatePimp

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 01-July 13
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,603
  • Reputation: 1,983
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 09:11 AM

If you watched Cam's presser, he said actually the SF defense was more focused on Ginn than Smitty. WTF Donald?!!



#2 Cary Kollins

Cary Kollins

    tengo baking soda

  • Joined: 07-November 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,222
  • Reputation: 8,194
  • LocationWinston-Salem, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 09:16 AM

Yep. Lafell was less a threat than a tight end, a one legged 34 year old and Ted Freaking Ginn.

#3 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,335
  • Reputation: 2,944
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 09:23 AM

Interesting. 

 

 

I think we may be beating a dead horse now though.  Who among us thinks that Brandon LaFell has solidified his spot as our WR2 or WR3, much less Smitty's successor (as argued by some as even late as August)? 

 

The ghost of Brandon LaFell has finally moved on, I'm thinking...I hope (not necessarily as a Panther, but as an every down WR).



#4 CPcavedweller

CPcavedweller

    Instigator

  • Joined: 19-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,787
  • Reputation: 798
  • LocationCary, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 09:25 AM

And Ginn ended up with 104 yards, not including his monster punt returns. Get this man a new contract!

#5 Kurb

Kurb

    I hit it.

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 13,705
  • Reputation: 4,445
  • LocationILM
Administrators

Posted 15 January 2014 - 09:26 AM

I liked Lafell's game, until the last half of the season.

 

As a player you have to be able to step up when your name is called, especially in a contract year.

 

The spotlight seemed to bright for him when Smitty got dinged up.

 



#6 intangiblejohnny

intangiblejohnny

    The Josh McRoberts of Posting

  • Joined: 28-November 13
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,846
  • Reputation: 616
  • LocationInterwebz
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 09:41 AM

The sooner Lafell's gone the better.

#7 Olsen88

Olsen88

    H.O.F Cats Fan

  • Joined: 28-August 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,927
  • Reputation: 502
  • LocationDouble Snow Land
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 09:52 AM

He wasted a good jersey number

#8 CRA

CRA

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 27,138
  • Reputation: 5,290
Moderators

Posted 15 January 2014 - 10:27 AM

If you watched Cam's presser, he said actually the SF defense was more focused on Ginn than Smitty. WTF Donald?!!


I think that means when we got down in the 2nd half and after that long throw that Ginn drew PI on.....Ginn had S help on him front that point forward.

89 can go vertical but it really comes down to a defender getting his head around. 89 won't blow past anyone

#9 SteveSmithGaveMeAShiner

SteveSmithGaveMeAShiner

    Junior Member

  • Joined: 29-September 10
  • PipPip
  • posts: 86
  • Reputation: 73
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 10:31 AM

And Ginn ended up with 104 yards, not including his monster punt returns. Get this man a new contract!

 

59 of that came on one garbage time reception looong after the game was over. I'm all for bringing Ginn back, but they should absolutely sign another young veteran to complement what they have in house. Ginn is a great deep threat in 3/4 WR sets and a special teams weapon, but he's not an every-down receiver.



#10 Anybodyhome

Anybodyhome

    USN Retired

  • Joined: 07-July 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,515
  • Reputation: 2,431
  • LocationWherever I May Roam
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 10:38 AM

Ted Ginn is easily my surprise of the year. The 49ers had relegated him to being a return man and really gave the impression that he had bad hands. I was worried because of the rep that preceded him- bad hands.

 

I was happily proven wrong, and I don't think it's a stretch to suggest he's a young 28 years old, having rarely been used the previous three seasons in SF. Easily one of the fastest men in the league still, he's a legitimate WR and return man and probably needs a long term deal.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users