Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Did Star and Short wear down?


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#1 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,810
  • Reputation: 13,352
  • LocationSC
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 02:19 PM

Steve Smith said on radio a while back that corner Melvin White hit the "rookie wall" pretty hard.  Even so, Smitty praised White as a hard worker and a student of the game and predicted he'll be better next year.

 

I'm wondering if anyone thinks that our top draft picks, Star Lotulelei and Kawann Short, might have had a little of that "rookie wall" themselves late in the season.

 

What say you?



#2 Black

Black

    Don't Make Me Get Money and Platinumize My Body

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,686
  • Reputation: 2,013
  • LocationNC
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 02:20 PM

Not really.  Gettleman even commented that KK had really come on strong to end the season. 



#3 TheRed

TheRed

    California Dreamin'

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 14,921
  • Reputation: 7,769
  • LocationCharlotte, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 02:21 PM

Those guys were balling pretty much the entire season.



#4 Camsfanclub

Camsfanclub

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 18-November 13
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 356
  • Reputation: 201
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 02:25 PM

They probably arent used to the grind but they still played really really well.



#5 Ken

Ken

    Triple Threat

  • Joined: 20-December 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,777
  • Reputation: 855
  • Locationnyc
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 02:25 PM

No. White played more snaps than them, so that's definitely a factor. Star and Short were fresh for the 49ers game. Short had a good game but went unnoticed. Star was also good as well.



#6 csx

csx

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 31-December 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 7,751
  • Reputation: 2,221
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 02:27 PM

There doesn't seem to be anything statistically to suggest they did. Short if anything came on stronger in terms of productivity.



#7 Mr. Scot

Mr. Scot

    Football Historian

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • posts: 44,810
  • Reputation: 13,352
  • LocationSC
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 02:28 PM

When he was in college, Star had a rep for being dominant early in games and tailing off later.  Panther coaches blamed that on him playing too heavy (said the same with Short if I remember right).

 

Any evidence of this now?



#8 Herbert The Love Bug

Herbert The Love Bug

    Stripper Name: Bo Dangles

  • Joined: 04-August 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,567
  • Reputation: 2,312
  • Locationtied to your basement wall
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 02:29 PM

I think they weard up

Sent from my SCH-I545 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app



#9 Lemory

Lemory

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 07-October 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,652
  • Reputation: 1,433
  • LocationRivera's Doghouse
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 02:29 PM

No. White played more snaps than them, so that's definitely a factor. Star and Short were fresh for the 49ers game. Short had a good game but went unnoticed. Star was also good as well.

Its hard to believe that an UDFA played more snaps this year than a 1st rd pick. Someone in the scouting dept deserves a raise.

#10 Porn Shop Clerk

Porn Shop Clerk

    Honky

  • Joined: 22-January 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 17,247
  • Reputation: 4,031
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 02:29 PM

more often than not, it seemed like our front 7 got better as the game went along

 




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users