Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Most likely trade partner for Hardy?

65 posts in this topic

Posted

This is fuggin confusing! Everyone knows but does anybody actually have it in black and white lawful written writing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This is fuggin confusing! Everyone knows but does anybody actually have it in black and white lawful written writing!

in the time you spent wondering and asking, you could have gts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

or common sense, who would give someone $12.8m then trade him to lose all that money against the cap?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Can we move all Greg Hardy stuff to one thread??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Wel I don't no I thought we were a franchise that gave away money for nothing to deadbeat underperforming pros therefore hindering our progression for years and years.

Not my fault I don't get what this tag and trade crap means, there shouldn't be thousands on here claiming to know what it means and are 'in the know' when thy know nothing. I mean how hard is it for one thread with facts instead of ten with thousands of versions

or common sense, who would give someone $12.8m then trade him to lose all that money against the cap?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Oakland would be perfect. Get Watkins at 5 and OL help at 28. Doubt it happens thoughs

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

This is fuggin confusing! Everyone knows but does anybody actually have it in black and white lawful written writing!

 

It really isn't that confusing.  Here is how it works:

 

 

There are two types of franchise tag designations: the exclusive rights franchise tag, and non-exclusive rights franchise tag:

  • An "exclusive" franchise player must be offered a one-year contract for an amount no less than the average of the top five salaries at the player's position as of a date in April of the current year in which the tag will apply, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, whichever is greater. Exclusive franchise players cannot negotiate with other teams. The player's team has all the negotiating rights to the exclusive player.
  • A "non-exclusive" franchise player must be offered a one-year contract for an amount no less than the average of the top five salaries at the player's position for the previous year, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, whichever is greater. A non-exclusive franchise player may negotiate with other NFL teams, but if he signs an offer sheet from another team, the original team has a right to match the terms of that offer, or if it does not match the offer and thus loses the player, is entitled to receive two first-round draft picks as compensation.
  • Under the Capped years a team can designate one additional player only as a transitional tag. A transition player must be offered a minimum of the average of the top 10 salaries of the prior season at the player's position or 120 percent of the player's prior year's salary, whichever is greater. A transition player designation gives the club a first-refusal right to match within seven days an offer sheet given to the player by another club after his contract expires. If the club matches, it retains the player. If it does not match, it receives no compensation.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I seriously doubt Oakland would give up their 1st round pick for Hardy. Maybe their 2nd. Another option would be to give them Hardy and swap 1st rounders with them.

I'd be happy with a high 2nd rounder for him. I don't really see any top-10 team giving up a 1st and the huge contract for Hardy. Maybe a team in the mid-late 1st, but there don't appear to be any obvious fits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

There is zero likeliness that the Raiders trade their draft pick at 5 For Hardy.

There 2nd and maybe a future 2nd? Sure.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Minnesota

 

Stafford, Rodgers, Cutler

 

They need a pass rusher for sure

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I would be shocked if we got anybody to pony up a 1st for Hardy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

No one is giving up a top of round one pick for Hardy. Oakland or Jag's might go for second rounder; but no way is Oakland giving up #5 for Hardy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites