Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

Most likely trade partner for Hardy?


  • Please log in to reply
64 replies to this topic

#25 jptaylor84

jptaylor84

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 17-September 13
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 649
  • Reputation: 220
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 03:53 PM

This is fuggin confusing! Everyone knows but does anybody actually have it in black and white lawful written writing!

#26 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,512
  • Reputation: 1,740
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 04:07 PM

This is fuggin confusing! Everyone knows but does anybody actually have it in black and white lawful written writing!

in the time you spent wondering and asking, you could have gts



#27 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,512
  • Reputation: 1,740
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 04:11 PM

or common sense, who would give someone $12.8m then trade him to lose all that money against the cap?



#28 CPF4LIFE

CPF4LIFE

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 10-April 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,759
  • Reputation: 1,478
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 04:12 PM

Can we move all Greg Hardy stuff to one thread??



#29 jptaylor84

jptaylor84

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 17-September 13
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 649
  • Reputation: 220
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 04:41 PM

Wel I don't no I thought we were a franchise that gave away money for nothing to deadbeat underperforming pros therefore hindering our progression for years and years.
Not my fault I don't get what this tag and trade crap means, there shouldn't be thousands on here claiming to know what it means and are 'in the know' when thy know nothing. I mean how hard is it for one thread with facts instead of ten with thousands of versions


or common sense, who would give someone $12.8m then trade him to lose all that money against the cap?



#30 panthers34

panthers34

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 07-March 10
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 913
  • Reputation: 135
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 04:46 PM

Oakland would be perfect. Get Watkins at 5 and OL help at 28. Doubt it happens thoughs



#31 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,321
  • Reputation: 5,869
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 04:54 PM

This is fuggin confusing! Everyone knows but does anybody actually have it in black and white lawful written writing!

 

It really isn't that confusing.  Here is how it works:

 

 

There are two types of franchise tag designations: the exclusive rights franchise tag, and non-exclusive rights franchise tag:

  • An "exclusive" franchise player must be offered a one-year contract for an amount no less than the average of the top five salaries at the player's position as of a date in April of the current year in which the tag will apply, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, whichever is greater. Exclusive franchise players cannot negotiate with other teams. The player's team has all the negotiating rights to the exclusive player.
  • A "non-exclusive" franchise player must be offered a one-year contract for an amount no less than the average of the top five salaries at the player's position for the previous year, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, whichever is greater. A non-exclusive franchise player may negotiate with other NFL teams, but if he signs an offer sheet from another team, the original team has a right to match the terms of that offer, or if it does not match the offer and thus loses the player, is entitled to receive two first-round draft picks as compensation.
  • Under the Capped years a team can designate one additional player only as a transitional tag. A transition player must be offered a minimum of the average of the top 10 salaries of the prior season at the player's position or 120 percent of the player's prior year's salary, whichever is greater. A transition player designation gives the club a first-refusal right to match within seven days an offer sheet given to the player by another club after his contract expires. If the club matches, it retains the player. If it does not match, it receives no compensation.


#32 Catalyst

Catalyst

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 04-May 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 4,107
  • Reputation: 612
  • LocationMorehead City
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 04:56 PM

I seriously doubt Oakland would give up their 1st round pick for Hardy. Maybe their 2nd. Another option would be to give them Hardy and swap 1st rounders with them.

I'd be happy with a high 2nd rounder for him. I don't really see any top-10 team giving up a 1st and the huge contract for Hardy. Maybe a team in the mid-late 1st, but there don't appear to be any obvious fits.

#33 TheJason

TheJason

    Black & Blue in The Bay

  • Joined: 29-August 09
  • posts: 417
  • Reputation: 233
  • LocationLivermore
SUPPORTER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 04:57 PM

There is zero likeliness that the Raiders trade their draft pick at 5 For Hardy.

There 2nd and maybe a future 2nd? Sure.

#34 stirs

stirs

    I Reckon So

  • Joined: 01-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 12,997
  • Reputation: 2,366
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 04:57 PM

Minnesota

 

Stafford, Rodgers, Cutler

 

They need a pass rusher for sure



#35 tondi

tondi

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 21-February 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,219
  • Reputation: 695
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 04:59 PM

I would be shocked if we got anybody to pony up a 1st for Hardy. 



#36 MrBubba

MrBubba

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 28-February 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,715
  • Reputation: 209
HUDDLER

Posted 15 January 2014 - 05:01 PM

No one is giving up a top of round one pick for Hardy. Oakland or Jag's might go for second rounder; but no way is Oakland giving up #5 for Hardy.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users