Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

David Newton ranking our 21 FAs by importance (updated 21 thru 5)

2014 Free Agency David Newton ranking Carolina Panthers

  • Please log in to reply
99 replies to this topic

#11 Carolina Cajun

Carolina Cajun

    Short Bus Allstar

  • Joined: 08-November 09
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,405
  • Reputation: 1,071
  • LocationCharlotte NC
HUDDLER

Posted 20 January 2014 - 12:58 PM

Lafell needs to go.  Even if we resigned him, he would only be taking up a roster spot and preventing someone else who has potential from taking over that #2/future #1 role.



#12 MtnProwler

MtnProwler

    MEMBER

  • Joined: 31-December 13
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 138
  • Reputation: 25
HUDDLER

Posted 20 January 2014 - 01:09 PM

This should be good.

#13 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 21,321
  • Reputation: 17,549
  • LocationOn a Sales Call
HUDDLER

Posted 20 January 2014 - 01:35 PM

*
A WHOLE PIE!

The fact that Jimmy Clausen's name is still associated with professional football in any shape or form is pathetic, tragic, deplorable, despicable, horrendous, and down right bullshit.

#14 CatMan72

CatMan72

    KEEP POUNDING

  • Joined: 04-January 09
  • posts: 15,554
  • Reputation: 2,801
SUPPORTER

Posted 20 January 2014 - 01:40 PM

Clausen, LOL

 

I'd bring Testaverde out of retirement before I spent another penny on Clausen. 



#15 Peppers90 NC

Peppers90 NC

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 03-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 10,416
  • Reputation: 1,707
HUDDLER

Posted 20 January 2014 - 02:09 PM

pretty much this.

 

as i see it, it's a choice between lafell, nicks, baldwin, decker, and tate.

 

i just don't see lafell as being all that comparable with those other options. sure, he's a good blocker and he knows the offense but he's just not as good as those others. the fact that he'd probably cost just as much as those guys just doesn't help his case.

 

i think we keep ginn around as he's just too useful as a returner and does really well as a third WR option and i think he's still got a good amount of room to grow as a receiver. what we saw this year was just a little bit of what he's got to offer, imo. lafell, on the other hand....i think what you saw this year was about as good as it's going to get.

 

let lafell go and pick up one of those other 4 guys and draft another WR in the first couple rounds and i think we're set.
 

i dont see Packers keeping James Jones and he isnt a dropoff from Nicks or Decker imo



#16 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,896
  • Reputation: 7,798
Moderators

Posted 20 January 2014 - 02:10 PM

i dont see Packers keeping James Jones and he isnt a dropoff from Nicks or Decker imo

 

that's a possibility also.

 

we have options.

 

i hope we get to take advantage of some of them.



#17 Car123

Car123

    Newton's Law

  • Joined: 26-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,177
  • Reputation: 637
HUDDLER

Posted 20 January 2014 - 02:12 PM

James Jones is a huge drop off from Nicks.

#18 scarface

scarface

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 25-December 10
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 3,277
  • Reputation: 1,348
  • LocationEastern NC
HUDDLER

Posted 20 January 2014 - 02:40 PM

pretty much this.

 

as i see it, it's a choice between lafell, nicks, baldwin, decker, and tate.

...or Maclin.



#19 top dawg

top dawg

    The Creative Cat

  • Joined: 11-December 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 8,339
  • Reputation: 2,944
  • LocationWITHIN MY MIND'S EYE
HUDDLER

Posted 20 January 2014 - 02:53 PM

James Jones is a huge drop off from Nicks.

 

Thanks to pro-football-reference.com:

 

I guess it depends on how you look at it. Nicks certainly has greater overall numbers.  The thing that concerns me about Nicks is money vs. production, relative to who else is out there.



#20 RoaringRiot

RoaringRiot

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • Joined: 04-March 13
  • posts: 4,661
  • Reputation: 4,580
  • LocationCharlotte, NC
SUPPORTER

Posted 20 January 2014 - 02:56 PM

 

 

i think we keep ginn around as he's just too useful as a returner 

 

 

Just a thought....do you think the possibility of Barner developing into a return man would make Ginn expendable?  





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: 2014 Free Agency, David Newton, ranking, Carolina Panthers

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users