Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

WOW!!

PJ or Rodney ?

169 posts in this topic

Exactly but you can't sit here and ignore the fact his coaches didn't trust him or he wasn't ready to contribute his freshman year or both. And the fact Hood was.

 

That's completely inaccurate... and something that was made up by moronic NCSU fans.

 

Everyone that know's anything about Carolina basketball know's that Roy has always preferred a traditional PG-SG-SF-PF-C line up and didn't adjust his thinking until last year when he was forced to play a guard heavy lineup with JMM at the five and Reggie Fricken Bullock at the four.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And my boy Gerald had never been sent down to the D-league.

 

Doesn't mean that at one point that those players were considered NBA caliber players based on their college production... something that you are adamantly denying; which turns out to be quite accurate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

D-League teams would beat any college team in a best of three series.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And my boy Gerald had never been sent down to the D-league.

He plays for the LOLcats, don't act like he contributes to a real NBA team.

Once the team is ready to start winning he will be replaced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And i've seen the same ability in Hood.

And while PJ's big frame does help him over the avg. Nba SG.

Hoods length gives him the same advantage. You're making a lot of opinions on PJ that can be said about Hood as well.

 

I've not seen Hood once try to take over a game... it might not help that he has Parker (who is the go to guy) on his team but let's not be naive and actually believe that Hood would be averaging 17 points per game if Parker wasn't taking a lot of focus off of him. 

 

Last year Carolina had no one to take the focus off of Hairston, Hairston was to UNC what Parker is to Duke and he played really well.

 

I see you mentioning stats quite a bit and I'd like to inform you that stats aren't even half of the equation. I used to record stats for a college football team and the only reason that they were even required is because the conference likes to use them when deciding all-conference teams.

 

For instance: Player A shoots: 51%... Player B: shoots 49%... what you don't know is that Player B averages 4 more shots per game than Player B because he is the go-to-guy giving him the lower number due to more shots taken .

 

For Example: Marco Belinelli shoots 50% and Arron Afflalo shoots 47%... However, Afflalo averages five more shots per game than Belinelli increasing the likelihood that his shooting percentage will be lower due to the amount of shots taken creating more opportunities to miss. Would you want Belinelli over Afflalo? I think not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not too many freshmen go to Chapel Hill and are expected to be key contributors. I'm sure it's a completely different story for a star recruit at Mississippi State. It has nothing to do with trust from the coaches. It has everything to do with talent on the teams. The Heels were one Kendall Marshall injury away from being in the Final Four when PJ was a freshman.

The point you're trying to make is way off.....

Dexter Strickland was starting ahead of him really?? The whole freshman contributing thing is a myth as well. It may have been true under Dean. But Roy has no problem playing Freshman big minutes if he trust them. Barnes, Hansbro, Henson, Lawson, Marvin Williams and others were all given playtime in their freshman year.

Again Dexter Strickland shouldn't be the reason PJ didn't see a lot of PT. It was PJ plain and simple or Roy forgot how coach?? Which path are you taking??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've not seen Hood once try to take over a game... it might not help that he has Parker (who is the go to guy) on his team but let's not be naive and actually believe that Hood would be averaging 17 points per game if Parker wasn't taking a lot of focus off of him.

Last year Carolina had no one to take the focus off of Hairston, Hairston was to UNC what Parker is to Duke and he played really well.

I see you mentioning stats quite a bit and I'd like to inform you that stats aren't even half of the equation. I used to record stats for a college football team and the only reason that they were even required is because the conference likes to use them when deciding all-conference teams.

For instance: Player A shoots: 51%... Player B: shoots 49%... what you don't know is that Player B averages 4 more shots per game than Player B because he is the go-to-guy giving him the lower number due to more shots taken .

For Example: Marco Belinelli shoots 50% and Arron Afflalo shoots 47%... However, Afflalo averages five more shots per game than Belinelli increasing the likelihood that his shooting percentage will be lower due to the amount of shots taken creating more opportunities to miss. Would you want Belinelli over Afflalo? I think not.

Then you're fuging blind. He took over at least 3 games when Parker was going thru a slump. Then he shut down the top scorer on Pitt Mon. Hood has been the most consistent player on Duke this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dexter Strickland was starting ahead of him really?? The whole freshman contributing thing is a myth as well. It may have been true under Dean. But Roy has no problem playing Freshman big minutes if he trust them. Barnes, Hansbro, Henson, Lawson, Marvin Williams and others were all given playtime in their freshman year.

Again Dexter Strickland shouldn't be the reason PJ didn't see a lot of PT. It was PJ plain and simple or Roy forgot how coach?? Which path are you taking??

 

 

Great...you named 5 freshmen who were contributors (one of which is not correct).  Like I said..."not many are expected to contribute".  It's not a myth.  Strickland had been starting for three years (yes he started as a Freshmen on a terrible team), Roy wasn't going to give his starting spot to PJ.  Again....you obviously have an agenda and your point is well below weak at this point.  Especially considering it has no relevance in determining who is the better player at this point and which has the highest ceiling for the NBA. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't mean that at one point that those players were considered NBA caliber players based on their college production... something that you are adamantly denying; which turns out to be quite accurate.

Why don't you tell us how many of those players in the D league that you named were taken in the 1st round?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dexter Strickland was starting ahead of him really?? The whole freshman contributing thing is a myth as well. It may have been true under Dean. But Roy has no problem playing Freshman big minutes if he trust them. Barnes, Hansbro, Henson, Lawson, Marvin Williams and others were all given playtime in their freshman year.

Again Dexter Strickland shouldn't be the reason PJ didn't see a lot of PT. It was PJ plain and simple or Roy forgot how coach?? Which path are you taking??

 

Yeah... ask Isaiah Hicks (who was a McDonald's All-American and ranked as the 10th best player in the country) who is averaging around 8 minutes per game if that's a myth... Let's also not forget that Meeks wouldn't be starting if it wasn't for James' injury and Britt has already been relegated to clean up duty due to McDonald coming back.

 

As for the players you mentioned.

 

Barnes was the number one recruit in the country... that would be like Duke not starting Parker for Sheed.

 

Henson only averaged 15 minutes per game his freshmen year... (not even half the game)

 

Lawson was competing with Quentin Thomas and Bobby Frasor for the starting gig his freshman year... obviously it was his job to lose (simile to Marcus Paige's scenario)

 

Tyler Hansbrough was competing with Reyshawn Terry for playing time his freshman year... obviously Hansbrough was going to get a bunch of minutes.

 

Marvin Williams is the only player that actually fits the bill of your description... he simply beat out his competition (which was decent) and in turn he got drafted 2nd overall.

 

As far as Roy forgetting how to coach.. I don't think he is a bad coach but he's average in my opinion. His recruiting (in the past) is what has made him a better coach than he actually is.

 

If you're going to try and skew stats and other info, please make it less obvious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Calvin Pryor sucks he's getting cut at some point they just drafted two guys that can disguise their blitz looks as both Maye and Adams can do a lot of the same things. Jets safety's are going to be beastly, and it's not like their front is bad either with Richardson and Wilkerson but I don't even know who is playing QB for them
    • Some of you may remember that I'm a banjo player and studying classical guitar and music composition at East Carolina University. This was my senior year and for my senior composition recital I composed a 40 minute chamber opera. I heavily borrowed from traditional folk songs from The Anthology of American Folk Music (good composers borrow, great composers steal - Igor Stravinsky). The idea was original to be about a 20 minute telling of the story from The House Carpenter, but after researching the history of the ballad, I decided to do a telling of the Scottish Daemon Lover version of the story and mix elements of other ballads into the story. I used a lot of melodies from the ballads that I used, though a lot of times you'll have words from one ballad, mixed with the melody from another. It's a large thing so I'm giving a link to download it from dropbox. I hope some of you are interested enough to listen. If you're not, who can blame you, move along and enjoy your day. The Daemon Lover Below is a description of each scene. Act 1
      Scene 1
      The House Carpenter is building a cabin in the mountains win a demon comes to see him. He says he must give himself or one of his family as a sacrifice. The House Carpenter says to take his wife, because she has no ability to make money for their children. Scene 2
      Jane Reynolds is alone at him and tells the story of her long lost love, James Harris. The House Carpenter returns home and tells her that he has to go out of town on a business trip. Jane Reynolds tries to convince him to stay, but she is unsuccessful. Scene 3
      Jane Reynolds is alone at home when the demon comes to fetch her disguised as her lost love, James Harris. He convinces her to go away with him and leave her children with the House Carpenter. Act 2
      Scene 1
      Less than 2 weeks later the demon and Jane Reynolds are at sea. Jane Reynolds begins to have second thoughts about leaving her family for James Harris. The demon grows tired of this and reveals himself to her. Scene 2
      The House Carpenter is living with deep regret for what he’s done to Jane Reynolds. He reveals that she is a witch, and if he hangs himself the spell the demon has on her will be lifted. The House Carpenter hangs himself. Scene 3
      After the House Carpenter hangs himself, Jane Reynolds can feel her witchcraft return to her. She makes the demon a mortal man and punctures the boat. The boat sinks and Janes Reynolds and the demon drown at sea. Below are the program notes for the piece When I was fifteen my Grandfather pulled a banjo down from his attic and told me if I could learn to play it I could have it. A few years later I discovered The Anthology of American Folk Music edited by Harry Smith. The music contained on those six CDs opened my eyes to an “old, weird America” that I had no idea even existed. I learned how to play and sing every ballad on it, and it was these songs that gave me confidence to major in music. I’ve felt for the last couple years that the deeper I get into classical theory and technique, the further I’m getting away from these folk songs that have been so important to me. This chamber opera is my attempt to reconnect a little bit with some of these ballads. “The Daemon Lover” is a traditional Scottish ballad that is known as “The House Carpenter” in America. The story in this opera is basically that song, with a few story elements added that come from other folk songs. These songs include “The Old Lady and the Devil, Butcher’s Boy, The Cuckoo, Omie Wise, and The Drunkard’s Special. The melodies are also taken from folk songs, though often the words are taken from one folk song and sung with the melody of another one.