Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

MichaelNewtonII

We may still have a shot at wiggins

18 posts in this topic

 Imo, kids should still be able to come right out of high school. Just my opinion.

same here^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wiggins isn't even that good. He's just a freak athlete. Freak athletes are a dime a dozen in the NBA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wiggins isn't even that good. He's just a freak athlete. Freak athletes are a dime a dozen in the NBA.

i'd take Wiggins over MKG as my SF 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd take Wiggins over MKG as my SF

I wouldn't.

MKG is only 18 months older than Wiggins...

MKG is one of the best defensive players in the league, & an exceptional rebounder. He was just as much of an athletic freak & hyped player in high school.

Wiggins isn't even the best freshman on his own college team. He's smaller than MKG, far inferior defensively, & shares the same offensive deficiencies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't.

MKG is only 18 months older than Wiggins...

MKG is one of the best defensive players in the league, & an exceptional rebounder. He was just as much of an athletic freak & hyped player in high school.

Wiggins isn't even the best freshman on his own college team. He's smaller than MKG, far inferior defensively, & shares the same offensive deficiencies.

I honestly think Wiggins has a "Clowney Disease" he is coasting through this year just trying not to get hurt because he already knows he's a top pick regardless of his performance is college. Honestly i think this guy can lock up on D in the NBA and become a premier wing defender as well as develop a jumper, MKG mechanics are just horrible and he'll probably never have a reliable outside shot while on the other hand i believe wiggins will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of people like the way the MLB draft works, where you can get drafted out of high school but if you choose to go to college you have to stay 3 years

 

IMO though the NHL easily has the best system.  Players can enter the draft as soon as they turn 18, but they can still go to college after they get draft if they dont sign with an agent.  The team that drafts them keeps the player's right until 30 days after they leave college, then the player becomes a free agent.

 

I think basketball could benefit from a system like hockey, where the players that need to develop can go ahead and get drafted early and spend time developing in college, while the Lebrons of the world can jump straight to the NBA.  You could even incentivize players to go to school by letting them sign for more money when they come to the league (so you still have rookie scale contracts, but guys coming out as Juniors get more money than Freshman)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of people like the way the MLB draft works, where you can get drafted out of high school but if you choose to go to college you have to stay 3 years

 

IMO though the NHL easily has the best system.  Players can enter the draft as soon as they turn 18, but they can still go to college after they get draft if they dont sign with an agent.  The team that drafts them keeps the player's right until 30 days after they leave college, then the player becomes a free agent.

 

I think basketball could benefit from a system like hockey, where the players that need to develop can go ahead and get drafted early and spend time developing in college, while the Lebrons of the world can jump straight to the NBA.  You could even incentivize players to go to school by letting them sign for more money when they come to the league (so you still have rookie scale contracts, but guys coming out as Juniors get more money than Freshman)

 

Interesting thought. As much as I love the college game, there's no reason for guys like Lebron or others to stay there 3 years, 2 years, or even 1 year IMO. I'd love a system in place where guys can jump after high school if they want, but should they choose to go to college, be rewarded with something other than the education/experience. 

 

If a HS player wants to jump? Go for it. But only guarantee their contract for 2 years or so (have to find something the players' association would go for). If they go to college, guarantee it for the length of the deal, say 4 years. Limits the risk on guaranteed money for teams drafting a HS player, and rewards the players who choose to go to school while also helping franchises make smarter decisions based on larger sample sizes of play. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting thought. As much as I love the college game, there's no reason for guys like Lebron or others to stay there 3 years, 2 years, or even 1 year IMO. I'd love a system in place where guys can jump after high school if they want, but should they choose to go to college, be rewarded with something other than the education/experience. 

 

If a HS player wants to jump? Go for it. But only guarantee their contract for 2 years or so (have to find something the players' association would go for). If they go to college, guarantee it for the length of the deal, say 4 years. Limits the risk on guaranteed money for teams drafting a HS player, and rewards the players who choose to go to school while also helping franchises make smarter decisions based on larger sample sizes of play. 

 

I would love something like that, not that there is anything wrong with college basketball imo but I am selfish and want to see players longer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
    • Assholes should've never taken it away in the first place.  Me and a couple buddies had a hookup and were all hyped up and planned out going to it... then the NBA had to get all political and take it out on the city of Charlotte and the fans -- which made no fuging sense.  Seriously doubt we'll even get the chance to go again.
    • 6'6" 255.  He'll definitely have some good mentors with JP, CJ and the rest of the D-Line crew. 255 he'll need to put some weight on don't you think?