Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Evan Turner vs Tobias Harris


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

#1 WOW!!

WOW!!

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,545 posts

Posted 10 February 2014 - 11:33 PM

Who IYO is the better player? 

 

And since tee leaves are saying the FO maybe ready to give up on MKG.

 

Which would be a better fit at SF for us?

 

 



#2 Smitty Is Our Savior

Smitty Is Our Savior

    Jesus Shuttlesworth

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,679 posts
  • LocationUNC Chapel Hill & Wilmington

Posted 11 February 2014 - 05:58 AM

Tobias Harris has the upside factor.

 

I dunno who fits better for us though, I can't do that kind of stuff with basketball analysis yet.



#3 carolina-chuck

carolina-chuck

    HORNETS 2014

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17,102 posts
  • LocationKurby

Posted 11 February 2014 - 08:26 AM

Turner.

#4 bLACKpANTHER

bLACKpANTHER

    º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,794 posts

Posted 11 February 2014 - 09:37 AM

Player A:

13.7ppg

1.4ast

7.5reb

.427 FG%

.193 3pt FG%

 

Player B:

17.4ppg

3.7ast

6.0 reb

.431 FG%

.287 3pt FG%

 

Player C:

16.6ppg

1.7ast

4.9reb

.420 FG%

.362 3pt FG%

 

 

who do you want playing SF?



#5 MichaelNewtonII

MichaelNewtonII

    DRAFT JULIUS RANDLE

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,094 posts
  • LocationESPN Studios

Posted 11 February 2014 - 09:54 AM

Evan Turner

Sent from my SGH-T399 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app



#6 WOW!!

WOW!!

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,545 posts

Posted 11 February 2014 - 09:56 AM

Lets remember one is 25 and the other is 21.



#7 OchoNueve

OchoNueve

    for those of you that don't habla espanol...

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,222 posts
  • LocationCharlotte

Posted 11 February 2014 - 01:51 PM

Player A:

13.7ppg

1.4ast

7.5reb

.427 FG%

.193 3pt FG%

 

Player B:

17.4ppg

3.7ast

6.0 reb

.431 FG%

.287 3pt FG%

 

Player C:

16.6ppg

1.7ast

4.9reb

.420 FG%

.362 3pt FG%

 

 

who do you want playing SF?

Player B is most well rounded although Bobcats could use someone shooting close to 40% from the arc.  I'm going with B then C then A from stats.



#8 thatlookseasy

thatlookseasy

    Death to pennies

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,929 posts

Posted 11 February 2014 - 02:05 PM

Dont like Evan Turner.  Hes not a bad player, but I just dont see him as anything special.  Still cant hit threes, nothing special on defense, decent ball handler/ passer but he turns it over too much.  He wouldnt be scoring so much if the 76ers werent garbage, and I just dont see him getting much better at this point (hes the same age as Kevin Durant).

 

Wouldnt mind picking him up in free agency at the right price, but I wouldnt give up a 1st round pick for him when you still have to pay him



#9 bLACKpANTHER

bLACKpANTHER

    º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,794 posts

Posted 11 February 2014 - 03:14 PM

Player B is most well rounded although Bobcats could use someone shooting close to 40% from the arc.  I'm going with B then C then A from stats.

 

A- Tobias Harris

B- Evan Turner

C- Jeff Green



#10 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Moderators
  • 14,630 posts

Posted 11 February 2014 - 03:29 PM

I'd much rather we offer the package we're offering the Sixers to Golden State for Harrison Barnes instead.  It's been reported that everyone is available from them (for the right price, obviously), outside of Bogut and Curry.  In that case, I'd even throw in MKG if they wanted him, plus the first-rounder, plus BG's contract.

 

I just don't find Evan Turner worth what they're asking.  He's typically the type of guy that a team keeps dangling out there and eventually he gets traded for like an expiring and multiple 2nd round picks.  I just don't want him really, especially not for what they're asking, and I don't really see how he makes us dramatically better.



#11 carpanfan96

carpanfan96

    play hard, hit harder

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,329 posts
  • LocationConcord, NC

Posted 11 February 2014 - 03:32 PM

I'd much rather we offer the package we're offering the Sixers to Golden State for Harrison Barnes instead.  It's been reported that everyone is available from them (for the right price, obviously), outside of Bogut and Curry.  In that case, I'd even throw in MKG if they wanted him, plus the first-rounder, plus BG's contract.

 

I just don't find Evan Turner worth what they're asking.  He's typically the type of guy that a team keeps dangling out there and eventually he gets traded for like an expiring and multiple 2nd round picks.  I just don't want him really, especially not for what they're asking, and I don't really see how he makes us dramatically better.

 

I wouldn't give up a first rounder, MKG and BG's contract for just Harrison Barnes.... 



#12 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Moderators
  • 14,630 posts

Posted 11 February 2014 - 03:38 PM

I wouldn't give up a first rounder, MKG and BG's contract for just Harrison Barnes.... 

 

We need offense and he's shown the ability to give copious amount of it when he gets the minutes, AND at the playoff level.  I mean, we're essentially offering the same thing minus MKG for a lesser skilled player in Turner, who likely has tapped out his potential. 

I include MKG because they certainly wouldn't move Barnes for an expiring and a pick.  They want something in return that they hope will push them over the top for the playoffs.  MKG's defense and rebounding would be a valuable asset to them.  That being said, I don't see them finding him valuable enough to move Barnes.



#13 RoaringRiot

RoaringRiot

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,818 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 11 February 2014 - 03:40 PM

I'd much rather we offer the package we're offering the Sixers to Golden State for Harrison Barnes instead.  It's been reported that everyone is available from them (for the right price, obviously), outside of Bogut and Curry.  In that case, I'd even throw in MKG if they wanted him, plus the first-rounder, plus BG's contract.

 

 

I don't think I follow....are you saying throw all of that in just for Harrison Barnes?  



#14 Proudiddy

Proudiddy

    The Thread Killer (Since 2004)

  • Moderators
  • 14,630 posts

Posted 11 February 2014 - 03:49 PM

I don't think I follow....are you saying throw all of that in just for Harrison Barnes?  

 

Yes.  Again, if we're offering BG and a 1st rounder for Turner, I don't understand why it seems to be a huge leap to throw in MKG as well for Barnes.  Barnes is younger and has a lot more potential and would be a move that fans would get excited about.



#15 RoaringRiot

RoaringRiot

    SENIOR HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,818 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 11 February 2014 - 04:12 PM

Yes.  Again, if we're offering BG and a 1st rounder for Turner, I don't understand why it seems to be a huge leap to throw in MKG as well for Barnes.  Barnes is younger and has a lot more potential and would be a move that fans would get excited about.

 

 

For me I guess the problem would be this.....Barnes was the better player when they were drafted two years ago, he's the better player now, and he will be the better player in the future.  Any time it was suggested we draft Barnes (because UNC fans knew the talent he had would translate well to the NBA) all the ABC-ers said we were just looking at it through our "Heels-colored glasses".   Now here were are two years later talking about swapping picks (Barnes/MKG), giving up a 1st round pick, and an expiring contract just to get a guy who we passed on already.  I'm a Barnes fan and I'd love him here, but I would honestly lose all faith in Cho and the front office (the little bit I have left) if they made that move.  Not to mention it's looking like they missed on Zeller, too.  

 

If we're really talking about packaging MKG then I think him plus BG is plenty.  They're adding a raw talent in MKG, who can help them defensively and they're giving up a player in Barnes who is their 6th man.   




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users