Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

You think Hardy saw Michael Bennett's remarks on a "discount"?

65 posts in this topic

Posted

So if Hardy gives us a big discount and signs a long term deal and has a serious injury next year, do you think the same fans won't be calling for him to get cut or resign a lower contract? All of us know the answer to this and this is why our opinion means very little to players.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

we need to be able to let go of this idea or at least understand that even if we don't trade hardy for something that the team will still be benefitting from letting him walk as opposed to signing him to some big contract.

if we let him walk we'll be having enough cap space to help keep a more important player or two and some money to improve in other areas, plus we'll be getting a comp. pick. sure, it's basically an early 4th rounder, but still if that's all that we can pull off then we have to be fine with it.

we can't force anyone to trade with us. we can't force hardy to agree to go to a place that wants to trade with us. if we do want to get more than what i listed above, we can't afford to be too greedy and we will have to accept that we may have to settle for something that may be far less than what we think he's worth...and that means maybe an actual second or third round pick.

is he worth a couple first rounders? sure...but no one is going to pay that for him.

Thank you for this. I got ripped for suggesting the whole "tag and trade" wasn't going to be as simple as people kept putting it. This summarizes it very well.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Thank you for this. I got ripped for suggesting the whole "tag and trade" wasn't going to be as simple as people kept putting it. This summarizes it very well.

yep. people throw that optiin around like it's something that happens all the time or it's just an esy no brainer thing to do, but it doesnt happen very often at all, in fact I've asked people to list the number of times that teams have used that option in the past 5 or even 10 years. teams may have wanted to use it, but it's juat not that attractive an option.

 

it's not something to expect, nor is it something to bitch about the team not pulling off if/when they don't. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I thought the title of this thread read, "You think Hardy saw Michael Bennetts remarks on a "dinosaur"?

 

I was very disappointed when I found out my mistake.  I really wanted to know what he said about a dinosaur and how Hardy responded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Depends on the contract. Each of our first round picks under the new CBA has a fully guaranteed contract.

the key in that is our first rounders got fully guaranteed contracts, but not every 1st rounder did. Dion Jordan, and Mingo for example have offset language saying their contract is not fully guaranteed. but after those rookie deals, they will never get a fully guaranteed contract.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

the key in that is our first rounders got fully guaranteed contracts, but not every 1st rounder did. Dion Jordan, and Mingo for example have offset language saying their contract is not fully guaranteed. but after those rookie deals, they will never get a fully guaranteed contract.

 

Correct. The OP I replied to said there were no guaranteed contracts in the NFL. It may be just a matter of semantics, but I don't think that's true. I would say that just because there are very few fully guaranteed contracts doesn't mean there are no other guarantees. Because there are, as you've stated, and most players have them built in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I guess there is the possibility that his market rate isn't quite as high as he thinks and we get him for $9-10M instead of $12-15. I sort of doubt it but it is entirely possible that teams realize he was boosted by the other players around him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Also, in the real world, very good people donate their times and services to help the greater good of the community. NFL players can do the same thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Correct. The OP I replied to said there were no guaranteed contracts in the NFL. It may be just a matter of semantics, but I don't think that's true. I would say that just because there are very few fully guaranteed contracts doesn't mean there are no other guarantees. Because there are, as you've stated, and most players have them built in.

 

those guaranteed contracts are only guaranteed because the are not as high as they used to be, but name a player getting a guaranteed contract after reaching free agency? thats what i  was refering to, since the discussion was about Bennett and Hardy. Sam Bradford got a guaranteed $50 mill, compare that to Cams guarantee $22 mill, now ask yourself, which one would a Owner want to pay.

 

i guess i should have said there are no guaranteed contracts for guys who have been in the league, looking for their next contract.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I guess there is the possibility that his market rate isn't quite as high as he thinks and we get him for $9-10M instead of $12-15. I sort of doubt it but it is entirely possible that teams realize he was boosted by the other players around him.

 

And if not, some team will want him so bad they'll give us a 2nd and 4th round pick for him. Raiders please, don't let Tampa get him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Hardy's agent is Drew Rosenhaus, so let's be real... there was never going to be any significant discount. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The dilema here is will we or won't we get any compensation for Hardy? Letting him walk for nothing is ubsurd. It will be like peppers again except Hardy has not expressed or given any indication he wants out. He is the total opposite, he wants in but at his price. Which is fine. I just do not think gettleman will pay him top dollar like Hurney did to CJ. Quite frankly, I said this before, I think CJ was OVER paid. I am not saying he should have settled for peanuts but Hurney swung for the fences. I still think he is over paid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites