Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

TheMaulClaw

Bobcats vs Thunder 3/2

81 posts in this topic

Well last time we played the Thunder they beat us 89-85...so we can be competitive against them. Granted....I believe they were without Westbrook in that game, still pretty competitive game.

 

This game will be undoubtedly be tougher then the last time we played them considering Westbrook is back and they're at home.  Westbrook is not a good match up for us especially Kemba.  He's taller and just as quick and I believe the Thunder are going to be looking to isolate that matchup against Walker. The good news is the Thunder are prone to experience enigmatic losses against less talented teams from time to time. Hopefully this will be our day.

 

The big question is going to be our offensive cohesion and growth since the deadline trade.  Against the Spurs the lack of chemistry with our newly aquired players was almost tangible.  Swing passes that would have led to open 3's were a half second late.  Kemba appeared unsure of the best way to play with Neal, even though Neal was solid individually.  We could see how Ridnour was a true PG, he made some perfect set up passes, but still it seemed that the rest of the team didn't seem to be moving without the ball while he was in the game....which must be done with a true PG.  They're used to the drive and kick tendencies of Kemba and Sessions.  I've mentioned before that even though Ridnour is a great shooter, high IQ, and a consummate pro I'm not sure if he's a good fit here because of his inability to drive.

 

I do know that it's impossible to have a firm evaluation of how our new players fit in based upon their first game together against a great team.  Still 81 points is low, and I was disappointed with the lack of intensity that they appeared to finish the game with.

 

Defensively we've done some good things, but we're terrible at guarding the three against a team that has good ball movement.  If the Spurs played the first half (the first quarter really) like the second half they would have scored well over 100. There were all sorts of miscommunications on defense as expected when you add new players to the mix.....so we need to tighten that up.

 

This was why I wasn't a big fan of this trade.  It's not that Neal and Ridnour aren't good....just by the time they figure out how to play together there might not be much of a chance to grab the sixth seed and avoid the Pacers and the Heat.  Which is a 99.9999999 percent chance of a first round sweep and at best a (4-1) series final. This would nullify any positives that come out of that trade.

 

Either way.....I'm looking forward to the Bobcats proving me wrong.  Go Cats beat the Thunder!

 

So that's going to be the story of this game.  

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Westbrook has a good game I think we lose fairly big, but if he has a 3-17 game (which happens somewhat frequently) I think we have a pretty good shot against the Thunder. Neal needs to play more minutes in place of Hendo too.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bobcats are 10 point underdogs, which is surprising but the real interesting prop bet is Durant pts + rebs at 41.5.  Considering KD's combined average is 40, one may lean towards the under bc there's a decent chance the game will get out of hand and Durant won't play much in the 4th quarter.  However, Durant went off for 34 pts and 12 boards in Charlotte earlier this season.

 

I'll go with the under and predict KD to put up 28 and 11.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not having a starting SG who can hit a 3 or FT pisses me off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not having a starting SG who can hit a 3 of FT pisses me off

Or a long jumper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Refs are letting OKC get away with murder then calling weak poo on us.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You miss the point. Taylor was here before. We picked him because of what he could do for our wide receivers not because he had some great knowledge no other person had on the staff. Shula and Rivera and Gettleman studied multiple college systems for months before signing Taylor or drafting McCaffrey or Curtis and would have drafted the same whether Taylor was here or not. They liked the way Taylor developed McCaffrey which showed his talent but Stanford's offense wasn't Taylors idea or unique to him. Shula has a connection to Taylor as early as when Shula was at Alabama.  The debate was whether Taylor was chosen to replace Shula because Shula didn't know what to do to run a college offense and if he screwed up Taylor would replace him. And that Taylor was the reason and most influential in getting McCaffrey. I said it wasn't even close to the truth and this plan predated Taylor and was more thorough and we'll thought out. Everything since then just confirms I was right once again like usual.  
    • Assholes should've never taken it away in the first place.  Me and a couple buddies had a hookup and were all hyped up and planned out going to it... then the NBA had to get all political and take it out on the city of Charlotte and the fans -- which made no fuging sense.  Seriously doubt we'll even get the chance to go again.
    • 6'6" 255.  He'll definitely have some good mentors with JP, CJ and the rest of the D-Line crew. 255 he'll need to put some weight on don't you think?