Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

King and McNutt wont be punchlines for long.


Best Answer rscott94, 18 March 2014 - 09:53 PM

Pretty sure with a name like McNutt, he will always be a punchline.

McNutt busting into midfield for a 69 yard reception.

Go to the full post


  • Please log in to reply
76 replies to this topic

#16 mjligon

mjligon

    @mleezy53

  • ALL-PRO
  • 3,195 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:42 PM

the author writes:

"Though it’s still not crystal clear, general manager Dave Gettleman does have a plan for his team at receiver."

and it quotes McNutt as saying this about the plan at WR by the guys in the front office: “They're just not going to go all straight young guys. There’s going to be guys they pick up."


This should be enough for 60% of the posters on here to STFU every time we don't sign some bum ass FA.

#17 cbully

cbully

    Junior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,817 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:43 PM

look at that agility... 

 

seriously though i have high hopes for McNutt



#18 Riverboat Ron

Riverboat Ron

    The Gambler

  • ALL-PRO
  • 2,158 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:44 PM

So...

McNutt- 85 rec. 1530 yards 15 td
King- 92 rec. 1420 yards 12 td

#19 MHS831

MHS831

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,047 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:46 PM

Could someone help me out by explaining why King and McNutt, who couldn't see action on a team that boosted the 28th ranked passing attack, is supposed to be better than the WRs they could not beat out?

 

1. It takes WRs a bit of time to adjust to the NFL

2. They weren't born knowing the play book.

3. When you are winning, you do not change the lineup
 



#20 rscott94

rscott94

    Junior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,999 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:48 PM

Both of them have potential, but IMO I think their ceiling is a #2 WR



#21 Pejorative Miscreant

Pejorative Miscreant

    Cold Ass Honky

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,976 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:49 PM

Based on their inability to get reps so far my guess is they are complimentary depth players at best. Hope is not a strategy. Wish these guys the best but I don't think the answer is currently on our roster.

#22 Lemory

Lemory

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,407 posts
  • LocationRivera's Doghouse

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:51 PM

Wow some people are actually thinking rationally. I'm impressed huddle.

#23 Jangler

Jangler

    a head full of candy corn

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 47,629 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:51 PM

Pretty sure with a name like McNutt, he will always be a punchline.



#24 MedellinHeel

MedellinHeel

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,810 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:52 PM

I actually like Mcnutt and King and think they both can be more than serviceable. Only thing I am worried about is Shula and the oline. 

 

 

 

 



#25 rscott94

rscott94

    Junior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,999 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:53 PM   Best Answer

Pretty sure with a name like McNutt, he will always be a punchline.

McNutt busting into midfield for a 69 yard reception.



#26 MHS831

MHS831

    Senior Member

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,047 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:54 PM

Based on their inability to get reps so far my guess is they are complimentary depth players at best. Hope is not a strategy. Wish these guys the best but I don't think the answer is currently on our roster.

 

I disagree.  They needed to learn the plays, develop chemistry.  They were rookies drafted late--rough route runners. They needed time with proehl.  We got them because they are developmental players-

 

If the Panthers had gone 7-9, you would have seen more of them.

 

They are not going to be #1 or even #2 probably, but there is a place for players like this in the rotation.



#27 MichaelNewtonII

MichaelNewtonII

    Kelvin Benjamin OROY

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,527 posts
  • LocationESPN Studios

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:55 PM

I think King has potential idk bout McButt

Sent from my SGH-M919 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app



#28 MedellinHeel

MedellinHeel

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,810 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:56 PM

I disagree.  They needed to learn the plays, develop chemistry.  They were rookies drafted late--rough route runners. They needed time with proehl.  We got them because they are developmental players-

 

If the Panthers had gone 7-9, you would have seen more of them.

 

They are not going to be #1 or even #2 probably, but there is a place for players like this in the rotation.

 

this. many times young players who are not drafted in the early rounds simply do not get the burn or opportunity for various reasons. doesn't automatically mean they are worse than the guys ahead of them. 



#29 JJman

JJman

    HUDDLER

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,934 posts
  • LocationSpartanburg, SC

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:58 PM

I can't wait to buy a Mcnutt jersey.

I hear McDonalds has them on sale.

You can also get your Tavarres King jersey at your friendly neighborhood Burger King!

#30 Jangler

Jangler

    a head full of candy corn

  • HUDDLER
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 47,629 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 10:01 PM

 "Great catch by McNutt, he has sticky hands."




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com