Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

This is pathetic

707 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

Dude that CNN report you keep posting was based on a crazy persons accusations, there's nothing in the article that confirms your delusional conclusions.


What are my delusional conclusions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Are there really 31 pages of this shit? Jesus....

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

What the hell does that have to do with anything? More deviation and deflection from you on what really matters. 

 

I wouldn't describe it as juvenile as you did, but UNC is a big time athletic program and their brand is second to none. This "story" is a big deal, whether it's true or not. But hey, don't let facts get in the way. That's why I had a huge laugh when you were claiming a few months ago that Eric Prisbell had some sort of damning story on UNC that he was not releasing because he wanted to give UNC the opportunity to come clean. That right there let me know that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. If he, or anyone, had any sort of dirt on UNC you better believe that info was getting released the minute they could get everything on print.

That was info he had on Hairston and that situation, and did I not tell you that PJ would never play at unc again?  Eric Prisbell is not the one you need to worry about as far as the academic scandal, the one you should worry about is Dan Kane.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

That was info he had on Hairston and that situation, and did I not tell you that PJ would never play at unc again?  Eric Prisbell is not the one you need to worry about as far as the academic scandal, the one you should worry about is Dan Kane.

i'm not worried. The only people worried are ABCers who can't accept that we were dealt our punishment. We accepted it. We cooperated. We made changes. Get over it and move on with your life. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Yeah there is nothing new in that article.  It just reiterates the fact that the Independent researchers didn't use all the data MW did.  It's funny how she has admitted she used multiple tests for her research, that unc has admitted she used multiple tests for her research but unc only gave the one test to the Independent researchers along with 7 tests left out.  That doesn't seem fishy to anybody else?  Why not give everything she had to these researchers and say "get to the bottom of this"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Yeah there is nothing new in that article.  It just reiterates the fact that the Independent researchers didn't use all the data MW did.  It's funny how she has admitted she used multiple tests for her research, that unc has admitted she used multiple tests for her research but unc only gave the one test to the Independent researchers along with 7 tests left out.  That doesn't seem fishy to anybody else?  Why not give everything she had to these researchers and say "get to the bottom of this"?

MW actually said she used 117 models of SATA tests, then changed that number to 183 when reporting her findings to CNN. Either she can't count, has a bad memory or flat out lied to inflate her numbers.

 

These accusations are coming from a "Learning Specialist", she is in no way qualified to reach an analysis because she isn't a psycologist. The independent study was conducted by 3 well qualified EXPERTS and they all came to the same conclussion. So you're gonna believe a tutor over 3 professers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

MW actually said she used 117 models of SATA tests, then changed that number to 183 when reporting her findings to CNN. Either she can't count, has a bad memory or flat out lied to inflate her numbers.

 

These accusations are coming from a "Learning Specialist", she is in no way qualified to reach an analysis because she isn't a psycologist. The independent study was conducted by 3 well qualified EXPERTS and they all came to the same conclussion. So you're gonna believe a tutor over 3 professers?

I haven't seen this reported anywhere.

 

A learning specialist that has worked at unc for many years and is still employed there and she did have the help of a psychologist, remember the one unc just fired?

 

The independent study was a farce, they weren't given all the facts and data, hell unc's vice chancellor, Jim Dean, reiterated that yesterday which I sourced a page or two back.  

 

As far as your last question, do I believe a tutor employed by unc that worked with these kids on a daily basis, helped them read, helped them write, and helped them learn over someone looking at a test score?  Yes!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

That was info he had on Hairston and that situation, and did I not tell you that PJ would never play at unc again?  Eric Prisbell is not the one you need to worry about as far as the academic scandal, the one you should worry about is Dan Kane.

 

Dan who? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Yeah there is nothing new in that article.  It just reiterates the fact that the Independent researchers didn't use all the data MW did.  It's funny how she has admitted she used multiple tests for her research, that unc has admitted she used multiple tests for her research but unc only gave the one test to the Independent researchers along with 7 tests left out.  That doesn't seem fishy to anybody else?  Why not give everything she had to these researchers and say "get to the bottom of this"?

 

Again, you're reading and hearing what you want to read and hear. 3 independent resources find that a tutors claims were exaggerated and inflated? Well who in the hell are they? They don't know shit! What does Don Kane and Ben Stain have to say about this! HAHA

 

Like I said, I know your a stay at home, unemployed Daddy with nothing better to do - but you're obviously obsessed with a school that you have no ties to and you need to take a few breaths and step back dude. It seems unhealthy. You're taking the bait from every sensationalized form of muck raking journalism. 

 

Also 

 

go-white-boy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Again, you're reading and hearing what you want to read and hear. 3 independent resources find that a tutors claims were exaggerated and inflated? Well who in the hell are they? They don't know poo! What does Don Kane and Ben Stain have to say about this! HAHA

 

Like I said, I know your a stay at home, unemployed Daddy with nothing better to do - but you're obviously obsessed with a school that you have no ties to and you need to take a few breaths and step back dude. It seems unhealthy. You're taking the bait from every sensationalized form of muck raking journalism. 

 

Also 

 

go-white-boy.gif

You're getting as bad as heels31!  unc's vice chancellor admitted the researchers only looked at one test score, it's a farce.  You heels fans are all sheep, no pun intended, and say the same thing.  The same thing they wanted you to say and that is "well these researchers proved her wrong" even though not all the data or facts were examined.  

 

You can think what you want about me but I live a pretty great life and don't have to wait on a tax return to take a trip or take two bags of ice when I only pay for one.  I also don't know why it's so hard for you to understand that I do have ties to the school since I am a donor.  Do you not donate to ECU?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I haven't seen this reported anywhere.

A learning specialist that has worked at unc for many years and is still employed there and she did have the help of a psychologist, remember the one unc just fired?

The independent study was a farce, they weren't given all the facts and data, hell unc's vice chancellor, Jim Dean, reiterated that yesterday which I sourced a page or two back.

As far as your last question, do I believe a tutor employed by unc that worked with these kids on a daily basis, helped them read, helped them write, and helped them learn over someone looking at a test score? Yes!

You haven't seen it reported because you don't read entire articles, just what you wanna see.

Yes a psychologist that was fired for misconduct. MW presents these findings as her own analysis based on her data. Bottom line is that all these students had acceptable SAT scores and took SATA tests to identify freshmen with potential learning disabilities associated to ADHD.

If she's not qualified to teach a class or licsened to treat such disorders, then her analysis can't be taken serious. As far as helping students to read and write, according to her own data she failed at that also.

It's over... Case closed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites