Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Where We Stand: Receiving *UPDATED* 4/10

54 posts in this topic

Posted

The team will br LUCKY to get one receiver that is going to make an impact this year.

Unless you consider taking up a roster spot, making an impact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The team will br LUCKY to get one receiver that is going to make an impact this year.

Unless you consider taking up a roster spot, making an impact.

Have you not looked at this Draft??

WTF are you talking about??

This draft could produce a day 1 starter at WR in the 4th round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Why are people saying Olsen will/should be released soon? I know we are a run first team but removing either D willy or J stew would make more sense. Its not hard finding cheap quality RBs these days. One of those two should be on the chopping block before Olsen in my opinion if we needed to make more cap space.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

With the draft being deep, and talented at our positions of need. I believe we will be just fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Have you not looked at this Draft??

WTF are you talking about??

This draft could produce a day 1 starter at WR in the 4th round.

I doubt it does that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I doubt it does that.

Put money on it.

I bet there will be a 4th round starter at WR in this draft.

I bet $100 there will be 12 day 1 starters at WR from this draft.

You willing to take that??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Cam Newton made Ted Ginn relevant enough to get a three year deal one season after having two catches. Think about that when you fret about these receivers.

Ted made HIMSELF relevant w/ his kick return game a lot more than his receiving game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Put money on it.

I bet there will be a 4th round starter at WR in this draft.

I bet $100 there will be 12 day 1 starters at WR from this draft.

You willing to take that??

You know Day 1 is only the first round, right?
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I only see us going WR once in the first three rounds. Many with go full GrrBeck, and not saying my pov is right, but if you oppose me, just try and think about it this way.. ive said this in several posts lol

 

 

We feature our defense. our defense is top notch, and will only become better because of the youth and continuity with Rivera. "Make our strnegths stronger". what helps a defense? an offense that is consistent, sustains drives, scores every posesson while still eating up the clock. EFFECIANT. <---- key word. we can still have a good offense without scoring every 30 seconds. some of you guys want that flash, kick ass, fast paced offense (stats). If thats what you want, then so be it, but to trash our GM for making these moves is retarded. heres why:

 

the recievers we had last year might of hindered what our offense was trying to do. Two WRs with dropsies, and an older HOF WR that was a shell of himself. wana overpay to keep em? or do would you rather bring in players who are more conistant, with hands, with toughness, that run good routes to help our offense be more consistant for much much cheaper?? ill take that any day! The guys we brought in are RELIABLE options for Cam that will be where they are supposed to be and catch what comes at them. they will help with conversions and sustain the drives we need to keep the defense off the field.

 

 

a tangent, if you dont read anything else, please:

 

For all we know, gettleman could be an aceboogie, who wants that high flying, score every 30 seconds type of guy. 1) Our current staff just went 12-4, running a conservative, defensive scheme overall. would you want an ignorant GM that says, "Yeah, fug that. im bringing in MY TYPE of guys, regardless of what you are trying to do!" or a GM who works with the coach and brings in players that will work with the current scheme.

 

That is why i think it is just completly ignoranty and reactionary to peg gettleman as this or that. We can only speculate after one season, where he had pretty much everyone pre installed, without him making many changes. We have a very, very little understanding of what gettleman is truley about...

 

 

back to the cardiovascular system. end of my 2AM rant break.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

You know Day 1 is only the first round, right?

 

dude.. day 1

 

week 1

 

game one

 

doesnt take time to turn into a starter

 

immediate rookie starter

 

right?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I'm just wait'n to see how things turn out.

 

I have faith that we'll be better than more expect. but I'm not expecting Super Bowl worthy.

Holding steady while righting the financial ship is the goal... and I think we could very well achieve that.

 

Here's hope'n.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I only see us going WR once in the first three rounds. Many with go full GrrBeck, and not saying my pov is right, but if you oppose me, just try and think about it this way.. ive said this in several posts lol

We feature our defense. our defense is top notch, and will only become better because of the youth and continuity with Rivera. "Make our strnegths stronger". what helps a defense? an offense that is consistent, sustains drives, scores every posesson while still eating up the clock. EFFECIANT. <---- key word. we can still have a good offense without scoring every 30 seconds. some of you guys want that flash, kick ass, fast paced offense (stats). If thats what you want, then so be it, but to trash our GM for making these moves is retarded. heres why:

the recievers we had last year might of hindered what our offense was trying to do. Two WRs with dropsies, and an older HOF WR that was a shell of himself. wana overpay to keep em? or do would you rather bring in players who are more conistant, with hands, with toughness, that run good routes to help our offense be more consistant for much much cheaper?? ill take that any day! The guys we brought in are RELIABLE options for Cam that will be where they are supposed to be and catch what comes at them. they will help with conversions and sustain the drives we need to keep the defense off the field.

a tangent, if you dont read anything else, please:

For all we know, gettleman could be an aceboogie, who wants that high flying, score every 30 seconds type of guy. 1) Our current staff just went 12-4, running a conservative, defensive scheme overall. would you want an ignorant GM that says, "Yeah, fug that. im bringing in MY TYPE of guys, regardless of what you are trying to do!" or a GM who works with the coach and brings in players that will work with the current scheme.

That is why i think it is just completly ignoranty and reactionary to peg gettleman as this or that. We can only speculate after one season, where he had pretty much everyone pre installed, without him making many changes. We have a very, very little understanding of what gettleman is truley about...

back to the cardiovascular system. end of my 2AM rant break.

I think Gettelmen double dips at the Wr's spot.

1. He signed older vets to short deals not long term solution.

2. He takes what the draft gives him and WR is the deepest position this year.

3. He is ready to overhaul the position and give Cam weapons to grow with. And Gettelmen loves continuity.

4. Drafting WR is cheaper then signing new ones every year.

5. We had the 26th ranked passing attack. He wants to improve that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites