Jump to content





Photo
- - - - -

According to PFT Panthers have interest in Sidney Rice


  • Please log in to reply
127 replies to this topic

#25 MadHatter

MadHatter

    The Only Voice of Reason

  • Joined: 30-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 20,321
  • Reputation: 5,871
  • LocationDark Side of the Moon
HUDDLER

Posted 14 April 2014 - 02:36 PM

rice would be a solid number 2.

 

If healthy, Rice could definitely be a #1 WR in our offensive scheme.

 

Rice, Cotchery, and Avant would be a solid starting core.

 

2 TE's with Olsen and Dickson.

 

Throw in a rookie WR and King/McNutt and we would definitely be better than last season.



#26 Gabeking

Gabeking

    Member

  • Joined: 27-February 10
  • posts: 3,560
  • Reputation: 1,692
SUPPORTER

Posted 14 April 2014 - 02:39 PM

Cam Newton's Somewhat Erotic Ball Placement
 
 
 
long title for a porno

  

meh, almost pie


I pied, tie goes to the runner after all.

#27 SIGCHI222

SIGCHI222

    the illustrious potentate

  • Joined: 15-February 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 5,279
  • Reputation: 4,168
  • LocationShelby
HUDDLER

Posted 14 April 2014 - 02:45 PM

Caveat emptor.



#28 CPcavedweller

CPcavedweller

    Instigator

  • Joined: 19-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,811
  • Reputation: 807
  • LocationCary, NC
HUDDLER

Posted 14 April 2014 - 02:48 PM

Gettleman is a competent GM. He's going to have "interest of some degree" about literally every free agent.


A competent GM would not have interest in every FA.

#29 CollegePanther

CollegePanther

    President

  • Joined: 16-January 12
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,583
  • Reputation: 739
  • LocationNorth Carolina
HUDDLER

Posted 14 April 2014 - 02:53 PM

Oh yeah let's add another backup reciever so maybe the logjam will bust

#30 Woodie

Woodie

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,227
  • Reputation: 157
HUDDLER

Posted 14 April 2014 - 02:56 PM

Oh yeah let's add another backup reciever so maybe the logjam will bust

 

If healthy, Rice is far from a backup. 



#31 SCP

SCP

    Crop Dusting Son of a Bitch

  • Joined: 25-November 08
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 21,884
  • Reputation: 18,802
  • LocationOn a Sales Call
HUDDLER

Posted 14 April 2014 - 03:08 PM

I'm over due for a visit to Great Clips. I'll try and glean some insider info from Rice's aunt while she chops my lettuce.


Put in the good word yo and tip 20%.

#32 El Chingon

El Chingon

    HUDDLER

  • Joined: 04-January 14
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 1,931
  • Reputation: 644
HUDDLER

Posted 14 April 2014 - 03:15 PM

Would be an exciting signing but I don't see this happening. I predict Rice will sign with the Saints on a 1 year deal. 



#33 GamecockSmitty4

GamecockSmitty4

    Senior Member

  • Joined: 18-January 09
  • PipPipPipPip
  • posts: 911
  • Reputation: 295
HUDDLER

Posted 14 April 2014 - 03:39 PM

A competent GM would not have interest in every FA.

 

Ahh, yes. A competent GM would throw darts at a board and only evaluate a select few free agents. Good point.



#34 rayzor

rayzor

    shula is who i thought he was.

  • Joined: 24-November 08
  • posts: -28,757
  • Reputation: 7,993
Moderators

Posted 14 April 2014 - 03:45 PM

get it done.



#35 SauceBoss

SauceBoss

    IT IS WHAT IT IS

  • Joined: 20-September 11
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • posts: 2,294
  • Reputation: 356
  • LocationGreenville, SC
HUDDLER

Posted 14 April 2014 - 04:00 PM

The media belives we are interested in all available receivers even when we're not, then those receivers use that to their advantage. Would I like Rice here though? Of course, atleast for a shot at camp. I still think first or second round best WR and best OL depending on situation is ideal.



#36 PhillyB

PhillyB

    sườn núi phía đông thứ ba của mặt trời

  • Joined: 29-November 08
  • posts: 23,787
  • Reputation: 20,002
  • Locationthird spur east of the sun
SUPPORTER

Posted 14 April 2014 - 04:05 PM

do it do it




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users