Goodell actually said the advantage was not the focus? But that breaking the rule that all 32 teams adhere to was the problem. It doesn't matter if they gained an advantage or not? I am wondering where this Goodell was during Ballghazi? Maybe he got confused and meant to say, " the rules that 31 teams adhere to?"
I'm not advocating for the Browns or Falcs. Fugg em'. Just pointing out Goodell's bromance for Mark Kraft.
I'd just like to point out that YOU never said the SEC was better. We just engaged in civil discussion.
Agree. I said they were getting better and had a chance to upset, or at least surprise some teams this year. Which, if LSU hadn't sh%t the bed and made 2 free throws the NCST fans would be as quiet as mices now. But all in all the SEC was over talented and under coached. I am sure they are all in, "we shoulda done this", mode right about now. But hey, the ACC won the battle, but my Cats will win the war! Go Big Blue!!!!
i've noticed that the "i'm independent!" schtick seems to be in vogue among former republicans who are annoyed that the GOP isn't producing candidates that are conservative enough, so they abandon it a la glen beck for that very reason. i personally know countless of them and this board is filled with that same sort of rhetoric fairly often.
glad to see you have more sense than that.
You are a piece of work. So you would rather that rep voters just accept the party for all its flaws and just be quiet little sheep. they are not allowed to change? Unless they change to your side? Otherwise they're morons. I am personally glad to see so many taking stance against the party. I just wish you dems had that much sense to stand against the flaws of yours. you could start with the corruption and the non transparency issues. Which are moreless the reasons people have taken a step away from the reps. This bs line about not conservative enough candidates is mostly a line towed by the liberal media.
The rep party doesn't have a problem promising conservative values and principles. They just have no intention on delivering them. And thats where that frustration comes from.
So what are you saying then if I'm arguing against a straw man? It sure sounds to me like you're saying there was no way for the DOJ to investigate this correctly.
Apologist for what? I've been equally hard on the police about this situation, both the shooting and the way the riots were handled and am calling for them to be disbanded and reorganized. I was hard on the police in the case here in Wilmington where they threw the dog on the guy... I was hard on the police after the Eric Garner incident in NYC... exactly what am I an apologist for?
No, as I've said before, you don't like it when people call you out for having an agenda other than the truth.
As I said in my initial post, had the DOJ found credible evidence that Wilson was guilty of a crime or negligent in his duties, throw him under the jail. I'm of the opinion that those with authority should be held to a higher standard of accountability than everyone else.
You don't care, you just want to call names and shoot the police, right?
And what? log off the internet and go outside? Not while Mom's got piping fresh hot-pockets roasting in the microwave! Nope. He'll just agitate and instigate until someone else does it. Then he'll crusade online for them. it's a beautiful day. don't waste anymore of it on this maroon.