Jump to content


GOOGLE RON PAUL

Member Since 06 Aug 2012
Offline Last Active Today, 05:05 AM
*----

#1952215 anderson cooper does another story on perhaps the largest child pornography e...

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 20 October 2012 - 02:05 AM

*cough*


heh speaking of which here's an interesting little article which attempts to explain what sexual objectification is to those who don't seem to get it

Sexual objectification is the viewing of people solely as de-personalised objects of desire instead of as individuals with complex personalities and desires/plans of their own. This is done by speaking/thinking of women especially as only their bodies, either the whole body, or as fetishised body parts.
Sexual attraction is not the same as sexual objectification: objectification only occurs when the individuality of the desired person is not acknowledged. Pornography, prostitution, sexual harassment and the representation of women in mass media and art are all examples of common sexual objectification.
The concept of objectification owes much to the work of Simone de Beauvoir regarding the basic dualism of human consciousness between the Self and the Other: the general mental process where humans classify the world into ‘us’ and ‘them’. Women are universally viewed as the Other across all cultures, a role which is both externally imposed and internalised, and which means that women are generally not truly regarded as fully human. An important point of de Beauvoir’s was that this Othering effect is the same whether women are viewed as wholly inferior or if femininity is viewed as mysterious and morally superior: Otherness and full equality cannot coexist.


http://finallyfemini...bjectification/

the objectification (primarily the fetishization of body parts) that goes on throughout the huddle (particularly within the lovely ladies section, as well as like 50% of avatars) is a problem because
1) objectification is bad
2) it fosters a culture that is off-putting to both women and men who aren't interested in coming to a football forum and seeing "lol boobies here look at my avatar it has boobies in it i liek tities" all over the fuging place


#1952123 springfield, illinois preacher's anti gay-rights speech

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 19 October 2012 - 09:52 PM

he's right


#1951326 I'm an independent moderate - convince me to vote for obama or romney.

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 19 October 2012 - 02:08 AM

but you're right, that is a critical point. i'm concerned fundamentally about the use of literal biblical interpretation in social systems, and i honestly think we'd live in an iron-clad theocracy with little discernible difference between it and sharia law if southern fundies had their way.

the question begs itself, then, whether or not romney is socially conservative enough to appoint a radical.


take a look at his advisors and then tell me that he wouldn't appoint scalia 2.0. additionally, you can actually see the justices obama has appointed. you know they aren't going to take us back to the 1800s. with romney, at best, he might not. still appears to be a pretty clear distinction.

obama has continued a lot of republican bullshit since being elected and rightfully deserves criticism for, in ways, being bush3, but poo romney might as well be GWB. i could be wrong but you at least appear to lean somewhat left of center, and if you're interested in voting for the lesser of two evils (i am not) then it seems like you align more closely with the president.


#1949320 Remember, race has nothing to do with it...

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 17 October 2012 - 02:14 AM

i mean i'm 100% comfortable discussing my political beliefs with "groups of minorities" but how many of you dudes are willing to tell a "group of minorities" that welfare is slavery, poor people are lazy, and the civil rights act limits freedom


#1949169 Town Hall Debate

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 16 October 2012 - 10:17 PM

Posted Image


#1949158 Town Hall Debate

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 16 October 2012 - 10:08 PM

hahahaha pstall is so mad


#1948036 Hillary admits responsibility for Benghazi

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 16 October 2012 - 01:17 AM

as a true conservative i'm torn between blaming obummer or blaming hitlery or maybe just realizing that it's a tad bit ridiculous to go after those two when embassy security was cut by congress

but i'll stand by my statements that dear leader gwb was not at all in any way responsible for 9/11 and the 2 unnecessary wars that followed


#1947817 Remember, race has nothing to do with it...

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 15 October 2012 - 09:34 PM

Posted Image


#1945941 New Questions For Presidential Candidates

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 14 October 2012 - 01:34 AM




#1943395 It needs to be asked

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 11 October 2012 - 03:30 AM

It needs to be asked


uh no actually it doesn't

this is worse than the goatse thread


#1934738 Romney 1 Obama 0

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 05 October 2012 - 02:48 AM

also it's interesting that the lieberal communist black liberation theology lamestream mainstream media unanimously declared the cultist robot the winner of the stump speech showdown


#1933544 What would this place look like if we went for it on 4th and 1?

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 04 October 2012 - 02:08 AM

So, why don't you tell us how you really feel?

3 and out, is 3 and out. Does not matter how those plays unfolded. Just because you are butthurt does not mean you can rearrange facts to suit your pissdom.

Ah, nevermind. Fap away.


julio jones straight up torched the secondary on that play. no "rearranging facts" necessary. matt ryan had ~300 yards before the final drive. the falcons had already scored 27 points. we needed one yard to win the game. our secondary is pretty bad. we have cam newton under center. we have a poo ton of cap space invested in the running game. rivera blinked and you support it.

also, from another thread:

Did Rivera really doubt his team's ability to convert after they "failed" to convert on third down? That seems impossibly short-sighted, especially considering Newton actually made it past the sticks before having the ball knocked out of his hands. Since Newton arrived in town, the Panthers have faced third- or fourth-and-1 on 24 occasions. They've converted on 21 of those 24 opportunities.


that's 87.5% of the time. if i told you that you have an 87.5% chance of winning the game outright (and even if you do not convert you still have the lead and an opportunity to win) or you could just give the ball to the falcons and let them control their own fate, and you chose to punt, then idk what to tell you other than LOL


#1930953 If Cam Newton yelled 'get off my f***in field'

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 02 October 2012 - 02:37 AM

Those who are saying it's about race are fuging stupid. People rip on Cam because they find him arrogant.


yes you could say he's uppity

it's almost as if he doesn't know his place

right?


#1930947 open challenge/bet to user 'James'...dont be a pu$$ bro

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 02 October 2012 - 01:43 AM

this board has seen horse murderers and literal pedophiles actually post here but tbh account wager threads are somehow worse


#1927217 Punting was the right thing to do

Posted by GOOGLE RON PAUL on 30 September 2012 - 04:39 PM

lol OP trusts that awful defense to make a stop more than he trusts the offense to gain 1 yard and seal the win

be sure to send in your resume as soon as we have a coaching vacancy because you're definitely carolina panthers material




Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com