Jump to content


Member Since 24 Nov 2008
Online Last Active Today, 11:07 PM

#3138890 Four scenarios this weekend

Posted by Ccat on 16 December 2014 - 09:15 AM

I agree that it seems that way. However, there are always surprise wins where the team that seems superior loses.

#3138840 Four scenarios this weekend

Posted by Ccat on 16 December 2014 - 08:41 AM

And what each will mean for us going forward. Only 2 games matter next week. Browns at Panthers and Falcons at Saints. Here are the ways it could play out this weekend.

1. Panthers win and Falcons win. Best case scenario. Eliminates Saints. Winner of Panthers at Falcons in week 17 wins the NFC South.

2. Panthers win and Saints win. Falcons eliminated. Panthers would need to beat Falcons and Bucs would need to upset the Saints in Tampa for us to make the playoffs.

3. Panthers lose and Falcons win. All 3 teams still alive. Panthers could win the NFC South with the same week 17 results as scenario 2.

4. Panthers lose and Saints win. It's over for us.

#3070565 Cam just wants to have fun

Posted by Ccat on 06 November 2014 - 10:31 AM

When players are having fun, that usually means they are playing better and faster. When players start over thinking things on the field, it slows them down. This in no way means they aren't focused on winning

#2917781 Shooting in Missouri sparks protests, looting

Posted by Ccat on 30 August 2014 - 10:04 PM

Well I'm glad yall think yall know everything there is to know about police, but you don't.

#2917563 Shooting in Missouri sparks protests, looting

Posted by Ccat on 30 August 2014 - 07:53 PM

I had something similar happen to me about a month ago. Was walking on a sidewalk back from a corner store with my friend, cops drive up and immediately go into asshole mode, GET OVER HERE! PUT YOUR HANDS ON THE HOOD! WHO ARE YOU! WHAT ARE YOU DOING! I asked them what's going on and they said "we got a report of two guys walking" lol that's literally word for word what they said "we got a report of two guys walking".

I told them my name, as I'm legally required to do in the state of Nevada. Didn't answer any of their other questions, where I was coming from, what I was doing, ect. as is my right by the 5th amendment. That's when they threatened to arrest me for trespassing. The property where they stopped us was where I was living at the time, I wasn't trespassing and they had no evidence that I was either. Nobody associated with the property ever claimed we were trespassing and they didn't even check with the owner/operator of the property to see if our names were listed as living there.

They stopped us for no reason, detained us with no probable cause of anything. Threatened to arrest us without any evidence we committed a crime. I had to show them my ID and proof that I was living there, which I'm not under any legal obligation to do, to avoid being falsely arrested.

That's probably only the 3rd worst interaction I've had with the police in the last 12 months. Fun times.

Not saying anything that happened as you described it is right or wrong because obviously I don't know what went on. I just want to let you know for your knowledge in the future that probable cause is not required to detain someone. Probable cause is required for an arrest but reasonable suspicion is the level needed to detain someone

#2900974 Shooting in Missouri sparks protests, looting

Posted by Ccat on 21 August 2014 - 10:34 AM

In regards to this thread I would also like to say this. I am reserving judgement on the whole situation until for info comes out. No one knows for sure exactly what happened and the circumstances surrounding it. So, I refuse to take anyone's side on this right now.


I would like to point this out though. IF...IF...IF you are a police officer and someone just fought with you, grabbed for your gun, etc...and because of that you drew your gun. Then distance was created, but the other person started running at you again and you shoot, it isn't unreasonable to shoot 6 shots to defend yourself. You don't have time to just shoot one shot and then pause to see if it worked or not and continue like that. 35 feet is very close when someone is running. that distance can be covered in a few seconds. If you shoot once and it doesn't stop them, but you paused to wait to see if it worked, it could be too late to do anything more. 

#2900963 Shooting in Missouri sparks protests, looting

Posted by Ccat on 21 August 2014 - 10:23 AM

Sounds like that guy was not all there mentally, but if all he had was a knife, why not just tase him?


I really don't feel like getting pulled into this thread, because most people in here on both sides aren't going to budge from their opinion. However, I do want to point out that "just a knife" is deadly and Tasers don't always work. First of all, you might have only one shot with it, and if you miss then you better have the ability to defend yourself from the knife with your hand skills because you will be out of time to switch to anything else if they rush towards you. Second, even if you hit them with a Taser it isn't always effective. The effectiveness first depends on where the two prongs hit. If you have a good spread, then it will most likely be effective. If there is a small spread, then people can fight through the localized pain. Third, even with a good spread, someone on some hard drugs like PCP will be able to fight through it regardless. 


What I'm trying to say is if someone pulls a knife and is holding it in an aggressive manner near me and acting strange. I'm not going to choose the Taser as my choice of defending myself, because there's a good chance that could fail, and if I fail it could cost me my life. 

#2430210 Footage of racist Philly cops goes viral

Posted by Ccat on 15 October 2013 - 06:09 PM

Lots of good cops out there no doubt, even in Philly.

There is "officially sanctioned" behavior by organizations, then there is behavior that is unofficially allowed to persist by turning a blind eye to it.

Philadelphia PD has a long history of turning a blind eye to the racist behavior of their officers. The last thing they want is video evidence of that behavior, forcing them to confront it. Note: The PPD is currently being sued for wrongful arrest of civilians that attempt to record their officer's behavior in public.

Like I said, it's possible that PPD is that way. If so, then that needs to change. Not the way we do it around here though. We are actually encouraged to have video on ourselves, knowing that everything we do that's on our cameras is available to discoverable to the defense and/or a available to the public through FOIA

Sent from my SCH-I535 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

#1899569 Kuechly

Posted by Ccat on 14 September 2012 - 03:56 PM

Whoever says LBs aren't supposed to take up blocks never played LB apparently. When an Iso comes at an LB, he is usually taught to take on the FB with either inside leverage (spilling, so the back is forced to run outside where another defender is supposed to be) or with outside leverage (forcing the RB to go inside where another defender is responsible for making the tackle. Different teams teach it different ways. The team I play for usually spills while the backside LB runs over top. Same goes for power plays and counters when the LB has to take on a pulling OG or OT.

#1818292 Thomas Davis min-bio(video)

Posted by Ccat on 04 July 2012 - 09:46 AM

How many times can it pop before the tendens just had enough.

It's not a tendon, it's a ligament, and it's not the same ligament each time. When you have a complete ACL tear, they remove that ACL, then take something from somewhere else in your body (middle third of your patella tendon, part of your hamstring, etc.) or a tendon from someone else (not as reliable) and put it in place of your ACL. Amazingly, your body can take something like a tendon, recognize that it's not supposed to be there, break it down, and turn it into a ligament. Then, what used to be a tendon or muscle can turn into a new ACL.

Source: My own ACL tear experience

#1806202 The Problem with Same-Sex Marriage

Posted by Ccat on 19 June 2012 - 11:28 PM

Any so called Christian who acts the way the above cartoon portrays isn't really understanding how Christians are actually supposed to act. We aren't supposed to hate anyone. I know I sure as hell don't hate gay people. I have gay friends. I don't agree with what they do, because I believe it is a sin, and I hate the act, but not the person. We all sin. I tell lies, lust, etc. so I am no better than anyone else. All sin is equal so we are all on even ground. A Christian shouldn't hate anyone for sinning no matter what the sin may be, but it doesn't mean we may not disagree with the act. Christians shouldn't believe they are better than anyone else either. We are forgiven for our sins, but we are still sinners. Don't hate anyone.

#1804093 Same Sex Couples' Suing NC

Posted by Ccat on 17 June 2012 - 09:37 PM

You're calling it like you see it, and I can respect that since everyone has a different perspective. However, from MY experience, the people who conform and have given into cultural pressures of today's world are the ones who act the way I have described before, because it's a small minority of people who choose to abstain from sex, binge drinking, doing some form of drugs, dressing a certain way, etc. I used live like that, but have since changed. So tell me I'm conforming to societal pressures all you want, but I feel like it's the exact opposite.

#1803440 Same Sex Couples' Suing NC

Posted by Ccat on 16 June 2012 - 11:17 PM

This is pretty much how I feel about the difference between a true Christian and then the problems with self-righteous organized religious groups.

#1803184 Same Sex Couples' Suing NC

Posted by Ccat on 16 June 2012 - 05:15 PM

We're not lumping the religious moderates with the religious fundamentalists. They are. They need to get a new religion if they don't want to be in the same with the fundies.

We're not lumping the religious moderates with the religious fundamentalists. They are. They need to get a new religion if they don't want to be in the same with the fundies.

I think you have it wrong. Christianity teaches peace and tolerance, so the ones who believe otherwise are the ones that need to create their own religion

#1754686 Holy Hell What A Reach!

Posted by Ccat on 28 April 2012 - 11:38 AM

Projected by who? A bunch of people who are wrong all the time

Shop at Amazon Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com