So the highest rated player they "recommend" for us is 36th on their own board.
And they expect us to use the 28th pick on him?
Or the 60th?
Doesn't make a lick of sense.
Most analysts don't know that Gettleman favours BPA. This is why I don't take a lot of these projections seriously -- they literally just try and match needs with their boards, without any considerations for scheme or drafting philosophy.