so he's a good offensive coordinator because the defense did well. yeah i'm not buying that at all, that's a terrible argument.
know what else helps defenses? scoring points. playing keep away is fine if you can actually score from time to time, and against any reasonable defense the panthers were shut down.
He was a good OC based on what we did as a team.
Defense only did as well as it did bc of the type offense we ran.
Again, you get Cam a better supporting cast and then I will support an upgrade from Shula. Until then, a "creative" OC won't have success here bc we don't have the talent. Result would be turnovers and inefficient offense.....and that impacts how good our D can be
I don't think Shula is good. O is boring. With the talent we have on O....Shula ball makes sense with a great D. That principle has taken many teams to the post season.
60% Completion, 87.3 Rating
25 Touchdowns, 14 Turnovers
Tom Brady was very average last year. Team record doesn't make a QB great. Mark Sanchez played in back to back AFCCG & had an 11-5 record his 2nd season.
Brady also threw for 1000 more yards than Cam with less INTs
He wasn't very average. Very average won't get you to 12-4 with a QB turned WR in Edlemen as your primary WR. Great QBs don't put up absurd numbers regardless do talent around them. His weapons disappeared....and the few that remained were hurt often. Brady is still one of the best despite a decline
Sanchez completed 53% of his passes had 13 TDs to 20 INTs and went to a AFCCG with his team winning inspite of him.....bringing that up in regards to Tom Brady is madness.