you know... now that our defense is stout, i actually wouldnt mind a Chudzinski-like philosophy on offense. when Chud was here, our problem was defense. not offense. just imagine if we had that offense matched with our current defense?! we would be immediate SB contenders.
i suppose i dont mind the Shula-style offense as long as it keeps winning us games. but surely a team can run a ball-control offense and still be extremely dangerous with respect to the explosive plays.
Our D was stout in part bc of great health and the O keeping them fresh.
I do agree the explosive plays could improve
Chud helped our D be an issue. He would go for big plays and we had long droughts....D could never finish games they should of
Whats wrong with running a hurry up offense to pile up points and the go ball control to close out games? If the score gets tight late, open up the throttle again. Sheesh. And with our defense it would be pretty effective...
Well, let's say you go hurry up and have a couple 3 and outs...and the opponent doesn't.
You then are putting the best aspect of the team (defense) in position to get gassed and tired.....and then you lose games. I mean isn't the really what happened under Chud often?