Jump to content


rayzor

Member Since 24 Nov 2008
Offline Last Active Today, 10:14 PM
-----

#2905266 Is Rivera above...

Posted by rayzor on 23 August 2014 - 12:30 PM

i don't know, but i do know that i wouldn't be mad if he did.

 

that might need to be done if they have been a bit too chill.

 

i want there to be anger and fire there for the season, but i want it all directed at the other teams...not internally, which is why i was glad there wasn't the fighting in camp. i want them fighting the other teams.

 

in either case, hopefully this game against the pats did just that.




#2905245 NFLN replaying now

Posted by rayzor on 23 August 2014 - 12:20 PM

well that was fun.

 

in the future guys....keep the insults to the smack forum, alright?

 

moving thread.




#2905240 avant - "we're getting open"

Posted by rayzor on 23 August 2014 - 12:18 PM

LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOO dude. Wrong comment Jason

 

what's so bad about it? if you read the comment in it's entirety instead of just the twitter blurb put out just to generate clicks by getting a reaction out of people who tend to overreact (looking at you), you'd see it's about the chemistry and trust that isn't there that takes time to create. it's easier for cam to trust kelvin right now because those two are BFFs, but in time cam will start to feel the same way about other receivers...you know...after they've had time to play together and all.

 

cam is right now only targeting in on a couple targets and that has to change, but i'm sure it will just like it has in previous seasons.

 

but hey....wave that cam disrespect flag and wave it proudly. we're all watching.




#2904969 Dear New England, Thank You

Posted by rayzor on 23 August 2014 - 09:41 AM

I know this is tough for Carolina fans to believe, but the truth is, Bill really does not give a poo about the Panthers vs. other teams in the preseason.

This was not the Patriots getting all amped up, it was the Patriots executing. The Patriots defense is not the Panthers, but they were quite solid before losing 6 starters. They are now healthy and should be in the top 10, not the best, but if Gronk is back healthy, the Patriots will have an top 5 offense once again. Its preseason but its ok to give credit where credit is due, Patriots were the far superior team....not because the Panthers beat themselves.

Carolina had a nice season last year, now try doing that more than 1 year. By the way, Lafell is going to be the #4 receiver at best and #5 target overall. Carolina has no real receivers, only a good TE in Olsen. Make the playoffs a few years, have a winning season more than 1 year in a row before crowing about how great the team is.

i don't take kindly to fans of other teams coming in after a game to crow/talk trash about a "win" esp. when they didn't have the balls to come around before the game.

so....bye.


#2902570 Video- Mike evans gets in fight outside of nightclub

Posted by rayzor on 22 August 2014 - 03:33 PM

stupid.


#2901581 My last shot of Steve Smith as a Panther....

Posted by rayzor on 21 August 2014 - 05:59 PM

for a guy who's my favorite play of all time it's strange to me how completely i've moved on

same here.

i always thought it would bother me, but instead i just don't care. i'm too excited about the team we have right now and the potential they have this season and going forward. my mind is set on the guys wearing the jersey right now. when smitty retires as a panther, i'm sure i'll feel it more, but for now he's just another guy on another team. i've got no hard feelings toward him either because i know that if it were up to him he'd still be here. i just hope he has a bad night when we play them this year.


#2901575 Rivera on Cam: "He's got to develop as a passer."

Posted by rayzor on 21 August 2014 - 05:52 PM

Rivera smh. How can you disrespect our QB and give him no fuging line to be a pocket passer with. You better hope we have a winning season this year. Stop talking to the media you idiot.

did you actually read the article or the actual quote or just the title of the thread because that "idiot" was comparing cam with michael jordan in regards to growth and work ethic despite already having an incredible skill set.


superj smh.


#2901567 Rivera on Cam: "He's got to develop as a passer."

Posted by rayzor on 21 August 2014 - 05:46 PM

i don't think he means disrespect by it, i just wish he wouldnt say it.

say what? that cam knows he's got to develop as a passer much like michael jordon new he needed to grow as a shooter? what's the big deal? it's the people taking his comments out of context or cutting just not adding context to it that is the problem. people looking for drama will always find it, regardless of how carefully yoh word stuff. it's those people who are the problem, not the people being quoted. what was just done to rivera is being done to cam constantly.


#2901562 Rivera on Cam: "He's got to develop as a passer."

Posted by rayzor on 21 August 2014 - 05:42 PM

shame on you OP for your misleading title. but hey, i guess it wouldn't have the drama you were hoping to create by actually giving the context. seems you've done a great job learning from the likes of peter king and joe person. superj gave the response your title was meant to create.

"Cam's the same way. He knows he's got to develop as a passer."




#2900983 Bell getting some love on NFL.com

Posted by rayzor on 21 August 2014 - 10:45 AM

I would agree with Brandt 100% as you said (and not just cause he was high on Cam, the Panthers now). No arguments there.

Unfortunately, not every good GM makes a very good, or accurate/trustworthy TV or media person for various reasons (can't communicate well in the medium; doesn't watch players; games, or scouting reports; tries to pass off personal issues/opinion as scouting, etc.). That's my only caveat.

I think the Panthers former GM who's on that four letter Network right now is a good example of that currently.

agreed. and there are several former GMs and coaches who get a lot of work as analysts, but then you look at what they did before they were "former" coaches and GMs and it makes you skeptical of anything they say. guys like casserly and matt millen come to mind. both pretty much sucked as GMs and when i see them talking and drawing from their supposed expertise in the realm of player evaluation, i let it go in one ear and out the other. guys like brandt (actually both gil and andrew) seem to have found that balance between between being good analysts and communicators who had a solid track record throughout their careers.


#2899899 Bell getting some love on NFL.com

Posted by rayzor on 20 August 2014 - 12:38 PM

Gil was on the radio this morning talking about Bell. He also spoke about KB a bit, and the fact that he doesn't think Cam and Rivera get enough credit nationally. He basically gave his view of the team after spending a couple of days at camp last week.

Here is a link to the podcast for anyone that wants to listen

http://charlotte.cbs...ion-nationally/

very good listen for several reasons. brandt is one of the few media guys worth paying attention to, and not just because he was a cam supporter from early on in the draft process. he knows his stuff and all you have to do is look at his history as a GM. i don't like the cowboys and never have, but i respect the teams he built there.

if he gives an opinion about a player, you should listen.


#2893883 Adam Schefter makes the world aware we have zero receivers that caught a pass...

Posted by rayzor on 17 August 2014 - 04:08 PM

in 2011 we had a rookie QB throwing to new (to him) receivers including two TEs who were new to the team and all of them were playing in a new system and a new playbook and all of it was happening withput the luxury of OTAs. correct ke if i'm wrong, but that QB did fairly well.

i think we'll be ok.


#2892911 Kelbin Benjamin? Panthers.com

Posted by rayzor on 16 August 2014 - 04:27 PM

Kelbin Venjamin




#2891894 BR Ranks NFL Offenses

Posted by rayzor on 15 August 2014 - 05:07 PM

consider this....we were 2nd to last in drives per game (btw, that was by design). that, in itself, is going to limit 1) our yardage per game and 2) our points per game. it just makes sense that if you have less possessions than anyone that you are going to have less opportunities to gain yardage and points compared to the rest of the league. you want to know why we were among the lowest ranked teams on offense, consider the metrics most people use to gauge success of an offense are those two stats. why? it requires the least amount of thinking. how accurate a gauge is it? imo, not very when we scored enough to win 12 games last year.

 

football outsiders had us with 31.59 yards per drive and 2.09 points per drive, which was a respectable 11th and 10th rank for yards/drive and points/drive. like i said, that's respectable and pretty efficient considering the amount of drops had by the WRs last year. as a team, we caught 62.5% of passes thrown, which was 13th in the league...kind of meh, but still not horrible. Looking at team drops, on average we weren't too bad...about 17th highest team percentage. When you look at individual drops...smitty at 5.5%, lafell at 7% and ginn at 4.4% aren't among the worst, but we all saw the effects on drives. ginn's drop % isn't as high as i thought it would be, but i definitely remember watching those drops and those were some really big plays that we lost out on because he couldn't hang on to the ball. the timing of those drops were horrible.

 

if you give yourself more drives then it obviously gives you more chances and limits the damage that those dropped balls and failed drives have. when you limit the number of those possessions, you don't have the luxury of being not "among the worst". you have to be among the best. we had a couple very good/reliable receiving options last year, namely olsen (111 targets, 4 drops), dwill (36 targets, 1 drop), and tolbert (32 targets, no drops), but that wasn't enough.

 

we replaced some WRs with not the surest of hands with guys like avant (76 targets, 1 drop), and cotchery (76 targets, 2 drops). we have all either heard or saw how good benjamin has been in regards to catching the ball, but it wasn't until one of the very last practices that he dropped any which was a walk through in which people weren't really focusing on catching the ball as much as making sure they were where they needed to be when they needed to be. of course, there will be more challenges when real games start and he faces some tougher DBs and some scheming against him, but what I'm taking away from it is that he will be a very reliable target that puts himself in very good position to catch cam's passes, both the good and not so good ones.

 

so what we have is three new receivers who have shown or are showing that they have very reliable hands. combine that with olsen, dwill, and tolbert (and stewart who is also a reliable target when healthy) and we have a receiving corps that can help keep drives alive allowing us to make more of the limited opportunities our offense has each game.

 

what this also means is that our offense should be more productive. it will have more points and yardage (though still not being enough to pu tthem at the top).

 

the biggest thing, tho, is that it will help us win more games and those wins will be less dependant on the defense suffocating the other team.

 

the biggest thing we needed for this offense was to be more efficient and we've given ourselves the tools we need to make that happen. not just more reliable targets, but bigger ones as well.

 

sites like BR and ESPN who draw a lot of traffic, but who rarely look at the bigger picture, will probably still not give the panthers the respect that we hope is due them. that won't matter because we will see an improved offense on the field that stays on the field longer, giving itself more and better chances to score and will have more successful end zone efforts.

 

regardless of where the panthers rank on total yardage and points, the true signs of a successful offense will be our ability to turn more possessions into points.




#2889081 Brockel and Williams...big part of the equation this year

Posted by rayzor on 13 August 2014 - 02:38 PM

not that it matters really one way or the other, but i have always looked at brockel as a FB with tolbert.




Contact Us: info@carolinahuddle.com - IP Content Design by Joshua Tree / TitansReport.