Solomom Wilcots argues that Bush was a better draft pick than M. Williams - Page 2

Fireball77 · 07-03-2009, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by panthers55

I think that Pat Kirwin and Tim Ryan actually know what they are talking about and if they said it I might give it some credence.

Yep, those two are very knowledgeable. I pretty much agree with the rest of what you said too. I find it odd that a defensive guy like Wilcots would have the stance he did.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skew

How many of these talking idiots said the Cards were going to make it to the Superbowl this time last year?

Answer: 0

Yes I did LOL yesterday when I was listening to Keyshawn hosting the Rome show and he said AZ was his pick to go to the SB last year. ORLY??

JoCoLoco · 07-03-2009, 12:28 PM

Starting DE > situational RB/slot WR

It's getting pretty tiring with all these Saints bozos fishing for compliments and respect for Bush from their division rivals. We're never gonna like him as long as he plays with the Saints, and as long as he underachieves every season (whether from performance on the field or due to injury) we won't give him any props either. Brees, yes. Colston if he has another year like his first two. But Reggie has done nothing to warrant anyone's respect or admiration, and we're your rivals to boot. Give it a rest.

Mintal · 07-03-2009, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fireball77

Yep, those two are very knowledgeable. I pretty much agree with the rest of what you said too. I find it odd that a defensive guy like Wilcots would have the stance he did.

Yes I did LOL yesterday when I was listening to Keyshawn hosting the Rome show and he said AZ was his pick to go to the SB last year. ORLY??

Keyshawn needs to get a job in construction...

natty · 07-03-2009, 03:00 PM

He basically said Bush was the better pick because he's on a better team. I don't know much about the Texans but if they had a 23rd ranked D then what would it look like without Williams? It's not Williams' fault that they didn't build a good defense around him. No matter how athletic Bush is a top 5 DE is much more valuable than a tweener RB/WR. Bush certainly contributed to their playoff run but it was Brees that made the most impact on that team.

MadHatter · 07-03-2009, 09:24 PM

Wilcot's arguement is about as relevant and accruate as Jamie Duke;s statement that he would take Vick to lead a team. Two washed up idiots tryingto justify their jobs.

nc_biscuit · 07-03-2009, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by natty

He basically said Bush was the better pick because he's on a better team. I don't know much about the Texans but if they had a 23rd ranked D then what would it look like without Williams? It's not Williams' fault that they didn't build a good defense around him. No matter how athletic Bush is a top 5 DE is much more valuable than a tweener RB/WR. Bush certainly contributed to their playoff run but it was Brees that made the most impact on that team.

Great post...

/thread

ladypanther · 07-03-2009, 09:42 PM

Wilcots is still defending Vick. I think Wilcots is over- rated....mostly by Wilcots.

Raging Bull · 07-04-2009, 07:11 PM

Reggie's pretty much busted purely as a running back, but he's been excellent as a receiver and also a return specialist.

Wilcots being a fuging moron does not discount the fact that between the two it's pretty much been a push at best.

N'wahlinsCayenne · 07-04-2009, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoCoLoco

Starting DE > situational RB/slot WR

It's getting pretty tiring with all these Saints bozos fishing for compliments and respect for Bush from their division rivals.

So you're the second person in this thread who complained because I mentioned a player from a team other than the Panthers in the NFC South forum. I'll admit, I know nothing about the Panthers except what I get from Sirius radio, read in this forum (some news but mostly opinions) and video highlights and/or my very limited chances to watch them here from my apartment in Fort Worth, Texas. Therefore, I have very little to say about the Panthers.

It's the slow time of the year so I brought up what I thought was a very interesting take on a player from my fave team. Every thread here pretty much does the same. To me its just fun to see what fans of teams say in response and it's even better if a good debate arises.
And no, I was not fishing for a compliment for Bush. I posted this same thread in another Saints board. For the record, most of the responses I got were that both teams got good players to help their team and we shouldn't compare the two, although there was some interesting debate.

N'wahlinsCayenne · 07-04-2009, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raging Bull

Reggie's pretty much busted purely as a running back, but he's been excellent as a receiver and also a return specialist.

No one should have ever put him in the category of pure running back. It's the same as putting him at TE or offensive tackle.

07-03-2009, 09:24 PM	#15
MadHatter Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 3,199 Pie Slices: 0 Given Pie 7 Times in 7 Posts Rep Power: 14	Wilcot's arguement is about as relevant and accruate as Jamie Duke;s statement that he would take Vick to lead a team. Two washed up idiots tryingto justify their jobs. __________________ "What we have here is a failure to communicate...."

07-03-2009, 09:42 PM	#17
ladypanther Servant of Max....below Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 1,492 Pie Slices: 2 Given Pie 8 Times in 6 Posts Rep Power: 6	Wilcots is still defending Vick. I think Wilcots is over- rated....mostly by Wilcots. __________________ " *You only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough." Mae West*

07-04-2009, 07:11 PM	#18
Raging Bull shut your chocha Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 3,981 Pie Slices: 12 Given Pie 7 Times in 7 Posts Rep Power: 13	Reggie's pretty much busted purely as a running back, but he's been excellent as a receiver and also a return specialist. Wilcots being a fuging moron does not discount the fact that between the two it's pretty much been a push at best. __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-03-2009, 12:28 PM	#12
JoCoLoco Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 313 Pie Slices: 0 Given Pie 0 Times in 0 Posts Rep Power: 2	Starting DE > situational RB/slot WR It's getting pretty tiring with all these Saints bozos fishing for compliments and respect for Bush from their division rivals. We're never gonna like him as long as he plays with the Saints, and as long as he underachieves every season (whether from performance on the field or due to injury) we won't give him any props either. Brees, yes. Colston if he has another year like his first two. But Reggie has done nothing to warrant anyone's respect or admiration, and we're your rivals to boot. Give it a rest.

07-03-2009, 03:00 PM	#14
natty Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 2,051 Pie Slices: 0 Given Pie 5 Times in 4 Posts Rep Power: 6	He basically said Bush was the better pick because he's on a better team. I don't know much about the Texans but if they had a 23rd ranked D then what would it look like without Williams? It's not Williams' fault that they didn't build a good defense around him. No matter how athletic Bush is a top 5 DE is much more valuable than a tweener RB/WR. Bush certainly contributed to their playoff run but it was Brees that made the most impact on that team.