FAQ's for the Huddle Champions League

[Duekster]

Originally Posted by PntherPryd

I see what you are saying. But if they don't trust us to run a league-wide vote with iintegrity how the heck did we convince 45 people to send us $20?

Right now here is what the site says

"Reject" votes are cast (likewise, it will be automatically accepted if enough "Accept" votes are cast to make a trade rejection not possible). A missing vote from an owner at the time the poll is over is considered an "Accept" vote.

I have it set at 6 votes and 2 days review.

If you want to over ride it, you need to set up the case prior to the start of the season. If it is set up prior then everyone will accept it. Don't do this on the fly.


FYI, it can go up to 48 so that tells me it is league wide.

[Duekster]

I just bumped it up to 18 people who have to reject the trade. That seems fair to me.

[Hawk]

so curious...what is this fantasy football you speak of?

[PntherPryd]

Originally Posted by Duekster

I just bumped it up to 18 people who have to reject the trade. That seems fair to me.

agreed. in the age of apathetic voters 37.5% is a landslide!

[chris999999]

hmmm. points for receptions...LT, S. Jackson and Addai are gonners way before i get a shot...

[TheJza]

Originally Posted by chris999999

hmmm. points for receptions...

best I can tell, we get points just for pissin on the sideline!!!!

[Duekster]

Originally Posted by chris999999

hmmm. points for receptions...LT, S. Jackson and Addai are gonners way before i get a shot...

It also makes the WR more valuable.

[COOKINBRAK]

Originally Posted by Duekster

I just bumped it up to 18 people who have to reject the trade. That seems fair to me.

That sounds quite reasonable, as long as there's an "implied integrity" agreement. Anybody that doesn't follow such an agreement should be banned for life. Last year, in one of my leagues, a guy decided that since he was in last place he was gonna "guarantee" wins for certain people. He set his entire roster to "empty" to try to keep one person out of the playoffs. Now, there's a big difference between not resetting your roster and playing somebody on a bye week and physically putting "empty" in every position. When called out on it, he said he could do what he wanted. The commish locked his team and whover he played got an automatic win. Except a few people had lost to him earlier, so that wasn't fair. He said he was sorry, and would play fair. As soon as his team was unlocked, he started offering suspect trades (1st rd picks for 3rd string players). The commish finally locked him out and started setting his roster weekly.

[Duekster]

Originally Posted by COOKINBRAK

That sounds quite reasonable, as long as there's an "implied integrity" agreement. Anybody that doesn't follow such an agreement should be banned for life. Last year, in one of my leagues, a guy decided that since he was in last place he was gonna "guarantee" wins for certain people. He set his entire roster to "empty" to try to keep one person out of the playoffs. Now, there's a big difference between not resetting your roster and playing somebody on a bye week and physically putting "empty" in every position. When called out on it, he said he could do what he wanted. The commish locked his team and whover he played got an automatic win. Except a few people had lost to him earlier, so that wasn't fair. He said he was sorry, and would play fair. As soon as his team was unlocked, he started offering suspect trades (1st rd picks for 3rd string players). The commish finally locked him out and started setting his roster weekly.

Point well taken.

I promise to be active. We have a rather large pot on the line here.

[hmsmike]

Originally Posted by COOKINBRAK

That sounds quite reasonable, as long as there's an "implied integrity" agreement. Anybody that doesn't follow such an agreement should be banned for life. Last year, in one of my leagues, a guy decided that since he was in last place he was gonna "guarantee" wins for certain people. He set his entire roster to "empty" to try to keep one person out of the playoffs. Now, there's a big difference between not resetting your roster and playing somebody on a bye week and physically putting "empty" in every position. When called out on it, he said he could do what he wanted. The commish locked his team and whover he played got an automatic win. Except a few people had lost to him earlier, so that wasn't fair. He said he was sorry, and would play fair. As soon as his team was unlocked, he started offering suspect trades (1st rd picks for 3rd string players). The commish finally locked him out and started setting his roster weekly.

What a f*cking Loser!! If he didn't want to play, he should have never signed up!!!

[kharward]

Any update on the waivers/free agency process?

[Duekster]

yes there is posted on the website calendar.

[PntherPryd]

bumpage.


remember, this is from last year. New info to follow.

[Lords0fPain]

Are RBs largely devalued in this league? Looked like only 5 in the top 30 in scoring from last season. Just curious, may want to play this year. Thanks.

[PntherPryd]

Originally Posted by Lords0fPain

Are RBs largely devalued in this league? Looked like only 5 in the top 30 in scoring from last season. Just curious, may want to play this year. Thanks.

Yeah, if you caught that in the draft you were ahead of the game and I think three of four division winners had Brady. There was a pretty strong run on qb's early in the draft that caught a lot of people unaware. If you had a game plan of drafting qb in the 4th or 5th you got screwed.

We are tweaking the scoring a little this year, Duek will be in charge of that. Prior to the draft be sure to run the report again to see top scorers from '07 using changes from '08.

[COOKINBRAK]

I got a question. Can my team not be so shitty this year?

[shinner]

sure, but only if I pick the players for ya....