Jump to content

Luke Kuechly Photos

* * * * *

Ted Ginn joins the Panthers on a one-year deal

Mar 21 2013 04:06 PM Cam2Ligit2Quit Carolina Panthers
Former 49ers wide receiver Ted Ginn Jr. signed a one-year deal with the Carolina Panthers, ESPN reported Thursday, ending his three-year tenure in San Francisco.
Ginn had only two receptions in 2012 and ceded his kickoff-return duties to rookie LaMichael James late in the regular season, but he remained effective as a punt returner. He was 11th in the NFL in punt-return average (11.2 yards) after ranking fourth and third, respectively, the previous two seasons.
In the Super Bowl, Ginn's 32-yard third-quarter punt return set up a 20-yard touchdown drive in the midst of San Francisco's second-half rally.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.co...p#ixzz2OGdEMh5Y



Add Comment

384 Comments

:: before

after 9 pages, i can't believe this hasn't been posted, yet:

Posted Image
Photo
koolkatluke
Mar 22 2013 10:36 AM

It'd probably take a cap miracle, but I'd love to see the Panthers somehow manage to sign Kevin Boothe now.

Not just because it would be a good move - which it would - but to watch the full blown fangasm that would erupt in this place :lol:


I said earlier if we could get Booth and Alan Branch I would be hyped beyond belief.
http://www.nfl.com/v...n-Jr-highlights

Prob Ted Ginn's best game as a pro.
First off Dork, I never said Cam acts or talks like a thug, in fact, he is the furthest from being a thug. What I said was, he needs to learn how to conduct himself like a grown man during interviews and act the leader of the team instead of a kid. That is why Denver ripped him apart and mocked him til I saw a tear drop in his eyes. As a NFL quarterback he is held to a higher standard.

As for that Kuechly thing, just wait and see if we don't upgrade the linebacker position and see him get torched on the 3rd and longs when the defense needs to get off the field. You will see how many games we let slip threw our fingers again before I pull up this thread and say that I was right. At that point I don't want to have to thump you from my pubs saying I told you so, but I will.

thunderkatt is a known idiot. he was one of the "cam needs to learn how to not talk like a thug" dipshits from last season.

http://www.nfl.com/v...n-Jr-highlights

Prob Ted Ginn's best game as a pro.


Well, he is most definetly a body catcher.

But by the 6 game of the season it was oblivious that Everybody knew the offense and were better players then legatron. But it took Rivera until game 11 or 13 to make the switch. So again Rivera use of the depth chart is a question mark sometimes.


Again, new scheme, no offseason....Legatron was strictly on the field to make sure the guys knew what they where doing. 6 games in with hardly an offseason to install a new scheme isn't long....especially since the packages and gameplans change week to week

after 9 pages, i can't believe this hasn't been posted, yet:

Posted Image


16 pages

Well, he is most definetly a body catcher.


Definitely. He even had the ball smacked out of his hands after a big catch and run. Best we can hope for is some bombs down the sideline. Wouldn't send him over the middle, that's for sure.
He can be a good WR. He's blazing fast. Ted Ginn Burns Revis.
Btw, Isn't Revis going to the Bucs?

Definitely. He even had the ball smacked out of his hands after a big catch and run. Best we can hope for is some bombs down the sideline. Wouldn't send him over the middle, that's for sure.


Yea. I'm a huge Patterson fan and i was adamant about the possiblity of taking him at 14, but this kind of stuff is what worries me. Sure I think he could transition well catching with his hands, as I've read he is very coachable. But at the same time look at Ginn. Same kind of player.

And you know the huddle is going to go ballistic when Ginn drops that much needed pass. That's why I'm refraining from all of the "he can get better with better QB player" talk.

He can be a good WR. He's blazing fast. Ted Ginn Burns Revis. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dRz9WCgXRU
Btw, Isn't Revis going to the Bucs?


It's looking that way, but for a 1st and second round which is insane.

He can be a good WR. He's blazing fast. Ted Ginn Burns Revis. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dRz9WCgXRU
Btw, Isn't Revis going to the Bucs?


That was also the only receiving TD he had that season. (he had two as a kick returner)
Don't post often but is this thunderkatt tard saying that if we don't upgrade our Luke/ our LB's that they will be the reason we lose games because of poor coverage on 3rd and longs???

Hahahahahaha

Yea. I'm a huge Patterson fan and i was adamant about the possiblity of taking him at 14, but this kind of stuff is what worries me. Sure I think he could transition well catching with his hands, as I've read he is very coachable. But at the same time look at Ginn. Same kind of player.

And you know the huddle is going to go ballistic when Ginn drops that much needed pass. That's why I'm refraining from all of the "he can get better with better QB player" talk.


http://www.catscratchreader.com/2013/3/3/4033064/patterson-v-jones <--good read on why taking Patterson at #14 would be a mistake. If he was still available in the 2nd round, I think you jump on him.

As for Ginn, best move would be to put him in on 3rd and long situations and use him in the option/reverse packages. You have Olsen, LaFell and Smith as your primary options but not much behind them.

http://www.catscratchreader.com/2013/3/3/4033064/patterson-v-jones <--good read on why taking Patterson at #14 would be a mistake. If he was still available in the 2nd round, I think you jump on him.

As for Ginn, best move would be to put him in on 3rd and long situations and use him in the option/reverse packages. You have Olsen, LaFell and Smith as your primary options but not much behind them.


'Preciate it.

First off Dork, I never said Cam acts or talks like a thug, in fact, he is the furthest from being a thug. What I said was, he needs to learn how to conduct himself like a grown man during interviews and act the leader of the team instead of a kid. That is why Denver ripped him apart and mocked him til I saw a tear drop in his eyes. As a NFL quarterback he is held to a higher standard.

As for that Kuechly thing, just wait and see if we don't upgrade the linebacker position and see him get torched on the 3rd and longs when the defense needs to get off the field. You will see how many games we let slip threw our fingers again before I pull up this thread and say that I was right. At that point I don't want to have to thump you from my pubs saying I told you so, but I will.


sure thing mr. "curtis lofton is a better linebacker in coverage than luke kuechly"

Oh I'm glad you use Tate as a example. So here's a few question.

1. Who is the number 1 WR in Seattle because Sid Rice had pretty much the same Stats as Tate 50rec. 748 yads and 7td on 80 targets? It's not as big as the difference here is where 89 got 60 more targets then Lafell. Rice only got only had 12 more targets then Tate.

2. You seem to neglect mentioning that Seattle didn't have other targets like a good TE and FB to throw to. Zach Miller had 35 rec. for 383 yards and 3 td. Now Compare that with Olsen who had 69 rec. 843 yards and 5 td. Also as a side bar Olsen was targeted 104 times which is 28 more times then Lafell. So if you really want to be technical about it Olsen was the #2 WR.
Also Tolbert caught 27 ball and was targeted 39 times compared to Michael Robinson (FB for the Seattle) who caught 13 balls on 16 targets. You don't think haveing more weapons could have effected Lafell numbers?


89 got that many more targets because he is simply better, gets open way more, and the QB trusts him more. In Seattle, the QB trusts the WR1 (Rice) about as much as the WR2 (Tate), and if you watch the film I don't blame him because he gets open more consistently than our guy.

Zach Miller is a good TE (just as many suspected), and as soon as Wilson (and probably Pete Carroll) got him more involved in the game in the postseason, his productivity increased accordingly. Regarding Tolbert, I consider him the best FB in the game, so I suppose it's possible that he poached some receptions from LaFell, but it is pretty understandable because he is a much better FB than LaFell is a WR, and has proven his unique roll to be of key value to the team. LaFell has not done that in my opinion. In regards to Olsen, he is a better TE than LaFell is a WR also, so really the same train of thought applies. I could argue that Olsen is being misused and that he should not be our de facto WR2, and that just because he can raise his game to that level doesn't mean that it is or should be his natural role, and stunts the natural balance of the offense because we are overcompensating for not having that other true threat at wide-out.

Like I said, LaFell is fine for what he does, but he is never gonna strike fear in the hearts of the opposition, particularly on anywhere near a consistent basis, because his game hasn't risen to the level where he is taken as a serious threat. It will be funny if we draft an Austin and he immediately comes here and has an impact, then people will see what type of WR2 that championship level caliber teams have. This impact will blur the lines between the WR1 and WR2, and give LaFell to shine as the WR3 that he really is---the guy that lulls defenses to sleep and gets a few, hopefully key, targets a game.
Lol curtis Lofton a coverage linebacker?


Lofton is the league epitome of a two down Lb. whoever would say such a thing clearly has no business offering up their opinion.

That was also the only receiving TD he had that season. (he had two as a kick returner)


Yeah, but that alone tells you he has the speed to beat Db's.
Photo
koolkatluke
Mar 22 2013 01:13 PM

89 got that many more targets because he is simply better, gets open way more, and the QB trusts him more. In Seattle, the QB trusts the WR1 (Rice) about as much as the WR2 (Tate), and if you watch the film I don't blame him because he gets open more consistently than our guy.

Zach Miller is a good TE (just as many suspected), and as soon as Wilson (and probably Pete Carroll) got him more involved in the game in the postseason, his productivity increased accordingly. Regarding Tolbert, I consider him the best FB in the game, so I suppose it's possible that he poached some receptions from LaFell, but it is pretty understandable because he is a much better FB than LaFell is a WR, and has proven his unique roll to be of key value to the team. LaFell has not done that in my opinion. In regards to Olsen, he is a better TE than LaFell is a WR also, so really the same train of thought applies. I could argue that Olsen is being misused and that he should not be our de facto WR2, and that just because he can raise his game to that level doesn't mean that it is or should be his natural role, and stunts the natural balance of the offense because we are overcompensating for not having that other true threat at wide-out.

Like I said, LaFell is fine for what he does, but he is never gonna strike fear in the hearts of the opposition, particularly on anywhere near a consistent basis, because his game hasn't risen to the level where he is taken as a serious threat. It will be funny if we draft an Austin and he immediately comes here and has an impact, then people will see what type of WR2 that championship level caliber teams have. This impact will blur the lines between the WR1 and WR2, and give LaFell to shine as the WR3 that he really is---the guy that lulls defenses to sleep and gets a few, hopefully key, targets a game.


And again all I get from you is opinion no stats. 89 was triple and double covered some times but he was always open from your view.

I bring stats to this debate can you please do the same.
I like what the Gettleman is cooking. With limited cap space, he has resigned the Captain, brought in a DT (Cole), a safety (Mitchel)
a KR/PR and #3 wr (Ginn), 2 CBS (Florence and DJ Moore, and a RB (Armond Smith). More than Hurney ever did with more room to spend. Looking foward to the draft.

I said earlier if we could get Booth and Alan Branch I would be hyped beyond belief.


If he signs both a guard and a defensive tackle, people are gonna start sacrificing virgins to him :lol:
Ahhhh, just think... If Marty would have ponied up a little more cash for Jacoby Jones, we wouldn't even be having this Ted Ginn conversation at all.
Just because I said Dork, doesn't mean your avatar really translates your personality.

sure thing mr. "curtis lofton is a better linebacker in coverage than luke kuechly"

If he signs both a guard and a defensive tackle, people are gonna start sacrificing virgins to him :lol:


He did sign a DT, Colin Cole. Risky that he could regain form, but he was decent before injury.