Jump to content


- - - - -

Mike Wallace?


There's a lot of talk right now that the Steelers may lose Mike Wallace. He's a RFA, but they only cost a 1st round pick now with the new CBA and the Steelers don't have the cap space to franchise him or sign him long-term.

The talk is that plenty of teams would be willing to part with a 1st round pick in order to land one of the best young WR's in the game.

So... would that include the Panthers? The thought of Mike Wallace in this offense is pretty scary. He could be our long-term replacement for Smitty and while a top-10 pick is a steep price to pay, at least we'd be getting a proven player.

I doubt this happens, but it's worth discussing. There seems to be a very real chance the Steelers lose him and the idea of Cam + Mike Wallace is one that's worth at least considering.


63 Comments

I'd love to have Wallace, but this FO would never trade away a 1st round pick for a FA. For an unproven kid in the Draft? Yes. But for a proven FA? No chance.
We will need to replace Smith but the question is really timing. Do we need to replace him this year or 2 years from now. We fixed major portions of the offense last year and need to fix the defense this year. In a year or two we will need to address the wide receiver spot. The question is whether we need to address it right now this season.

I vote for spending our picks on defense and hope Smith makes it another 2-3 like he says he wants to. He seems rejuvenated this year instead of on his last leg. We only have 1 first round draft pick. If we were 1 player from being complete it might be different but we needs a number of playmakers. I personally think we have to build this as we go and defense is where I would spend my picks.

You are just ranking Cam Newton's raw passing yards.......at 10th. Which isn't a fair representation.

Cam Newton played 16 games. He isn't being compared to 32 other QBs who started 16 games. So boasting about your #10 ranking for Cam as an indivdual ......is flawed.

Carolina was credited w/ the 13th most passing yards. Carolina did not have a top 10 passing attack (at least from the yardage aspect).


had the Panthers not lead the nfc in ypc.............

I believe we might have thrown more. just saying.

had the Panthers not lead the nfc in ypc.............

I believe we might have thrown more. just saying.


And where did our passing offense rank in turnovers per pass attempt.........it wasn't good? We were much improved from a year ago in terms of positive production......but our passing game isn't good yet.
Our passing game is certainly already good. To say otherwise is ridiculous. It isn't elite yet, but it's definitely good.

What are Cam's yards per attempt? I'm pretty sure more than half of the 12 teams ahead of us on YPG pass a lot more than we did.

Our passing game is certainly already good. To say otherwise is ridiculous. It isn't elite yet, but it's definitely good.


agree. I just decided I was done with this discussion. But here I am..lol
Forsaking the ability to upgrade our offense because "it's already good" is a stupid way to run a team.

The price is too high, however, as we need that first.
we do not need a receiver this year. Yes we do need one but not yet. Gettis coming back and hopefully he will be fully healthy and ready to go. LaFell coming into his own late last year. (okay, that really sounds nasty) We can wait another year for a WR, since we have other needs.
The guy is worth a 1st, but we simply do not have the money to pay him nor do we need him.
might be the best WR not named Calvin/Fitz. Would be worth a 1st but no way do we handle a contract like he would want.
Without reading the thread:

1) It would cost us our first round pick
2) We don't have cap space to give him the contract he would likely command from other interested teams

No chance of him coming here, period.
I understand that its fun to discuss, and there is nothing else to talk about, but every time you're wondering if we'll sign _____, 99.9% of the time, the answer is no.
I have been saying for the longest people need to stop drinking the kool aid on our offense. Its not that good YET. But right now we just dont have the money to improve it through FA. Only the draft, money we do have needs to go to defense.

Our passing game is certainly already good. To say otherwise is ridiculous. It isn't elite yet, but it's definitely good.

What are Cam's yards per attempt? I'm pretty sure more than half of the 12 teams ahead of us on YPG pass a lot more than we did.


No, our passing game needs work. It isn't in the ballpark of being one of the better ones in the NFL. We went from horrific to middle of the road.......don't let the explosive plays fool you. It is an explosive attack......but it is wildly inconsistant.

Our passing game was greatly improved. Big difference.

The guy is worth a 1st, but we simply do not have the money to pay him nor do we need him.


everything said true
Would love to get Wallace, but I doubt we can afford him and it's not where we need to spend our limited FA dollars.

And where did our passing offense rank in turnovers per pass attempt.........it wasn't good? We were much improved from a year ago in terms of positive production......but our passing game isn't good yet.


don't want to argue but.......another WR isn't going to help our TO issues.

our passing game isn't good yet??????????? :eek:
Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop?Can we please let our WR develop?


Say it with me. Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop?
Can we please let our WR develop?

Everytime a FA WR comes into focus. Before you make a thread. Think this Can we please let our WR develop?Can we please let our WR develop?Can we please let our WR develop?

Carolina was ranked 13th in passing yards per game. That in reality, put us pretty close to the middle of the pack.

40% of Cam's yardage was RBs and TEs.

Not saying we need Wallace......but the passing attack was good for a rookie. It ain't good yet.


I'm not so sure. About half way through the season, Chud realized we had a run game. And the threat of the pass was more effective than having to actually pass. I will take 13th every year if we run it like we did most of the season. Being 1st in ypg doesn't mean much if you can't run on 3rd or 4th and 1.
Mike Wallace would be one hell of a FA acquisition... and he's still young.

however the timing along with the price is the main deterrent..

don't want to argue but.......another WR isn't going to help our TO issues.

our passing game isn't good yet??????????? :eek:


Offense is pretty good.

I guess it depends on your definition of what a good passing offense is......Bad, average, or good?...I think you would have to say overall it leaned toward average.

We don't have a a top 10 caliber passing attack. It is wildly inconsistent. A better WR that can make up for some less than perfect throws wont hurt. Also a better WR than Legadu would of made more plays on that role IMO.....often he was not really helping out his rookie QB.
IMO, i love a more balanced attack on offense, with our running game picking up speed, mixed in with the passing game, our offense is lethal.

Def on the other hand, terrible last year. To give up a 1st around pick, and to have to cut guys already on the team, that have potential, when we don't have enough depth right now, would be stupid.

I'm not so sure. About half way through the season, Chud realized we had a run game. And the threat of the pass was more effective than having to actually pass. I will take 13th every year if we run it like we did most of the season. Being 1st in ypg doesn't mean much if you can't run on 3rd or 4th and 1.


We were 13th in yardage...I think that suggests it was better than it was. Looking at points and turnovers I think made it more
average.

But as you said, having a good overall offense is
most important. I was just pointing out I think there is room to
improve in the passing area.....time to tinker there just isn't now

Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop?Can we please let our WR develop?


Say it with me. Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop? Can we please let our WR develop?
Can we please let our WR develop?

Everytime a FA WR comes into focus. Before you make a thread. Think this Can we please let our WR develop?Can we please let our WR develop?Can we please let our WR develop?


We have two 3rd year WRs. Not saying we should get Wallace, but how much longer should let them develop if they don't impress greatly next year?

I'd love Wallace, but he'll be way too much. We do need to be looking
for a new number 1 soon, Smith will be 33 and is in the last year of his contract. No guarantee he'll be back after next season or if he'll play as well as he has in the past or if he'll be healthy all year (he is kind of injury prone), and we don't know how well our WRs will play without Smitty.

We may have our starter for years to come on our roster already, but that's unknown. To say we're set at WR and just completely dismiss it is silly and foolish.
We won't get into a bidding war for a player at a position that isn't critical. We spent a ton for Johnson but he was considered the best player available and was considered critical to our defense. Williams is a stud but so is Smith. He is a luxury we can't afford right now. In a few years who knows.

There are a number of teams with tons of cap space which will run the price up for Williams. We won't be one of them.