Jump to content

pantherclaw

All-PRO
  • Content Count

    11,777
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4,244 Awesome

About pantherclaw

  • Rank
    Wise Ass
  • Birthday 03/19/1975

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Galveston

Converted

  • Location
    Galveston, Tx

Recent Profile Visitors

15,024 profile views
  1. Oh, I get looking forward to playing certain teams for different reasons, but I don't consider that a rematch. Just another chapter.
  2. What rematch? Those teams are long gone.
  3. If it doesn't interfere with my schedule.
  4. pantherclaw

    CHECK OUT THE SAINTS FORUM

    Doesn't matter.
  5. pantherclaw

    CHECK OUT THE SAINTS FORUM

    Very high percentage of idiots on that site.
  6. pantherclaw

    CHECK OUT THE SAINTS FORUM

    You're not even worth responding to anymore. You ignore facts and you won't debate. You attempt to manipulate people that you're incapable of manipulating. But please don't stop crying now.
  7. pantherclaw

    CHECK OUT THE SAINTS FORUM

    I love your bullshit. Take your own advice.
  8. Do you seriously want to make football that much more unwatchable?
  9. pantherclaw

    CHECK OUT THE SAINTS FORUM

    You're the one to throw insults first, but I apologize for stooping to you're level. You keep missing, or ignoring the point, either way, it is ignorant. The refs decided they'd let the receivers and corner backs battle. That's what happens in the playoffs. And it makes your question moot. If the refs called the no calls all game long, the game would have been different. I'd be more upset if the refs had thrown a flag, because of their decision not to call the other no calls. Either way, the refs suck. This brings me back to me original point, the refs were consistent all game long, and the Saints didn't lose that game because of one fuging no call. But please, keep beating that same ignorant drum the saints fans are.
  10. pantherclaw

    CHECK OUT THE SAINTS FORUM

    You have failed to acknowledge the ripple effect that the no calls all game long would have had on the game. It's not a dead horse. You won't acknowledge it, because it makes your point completely moot. I'm not arguing that that one play was a no call. I AM stating the Saints did not lose because of that ONE no call. They lost that game before then, and you can't even grasp the simple reasonings for it.
  11. pantherclaw

    Officiating was disgusting.

    I have no complaints about the officiating in the rams/saints game, because they called the game consistently. The Patriots/Chiefs game on the other hand. When have the Patriots been in the playoffs and there not be bullshit officiating?? Seriously.
  12. pantherclaw

    Go Rams, obviously.

    Should be a good game. I honestly don't care who wins.
  13. pantherclaw

    CHECK OUT THE SAINTS FORUM

    The officials were consistent all game long, which is about all you can ask for out of officials. If you're going to start complaining about a no call late in the 4th quarter, then you have to complain about ALL the no calls the entire game. If the calls were called as consistently as they weren't called, then the Saints never would have been in that position late in the 4th to complain about a no call. These are all facts. So you keep on beating that dead horse. The Chiefs were the ones screwed by the refs.
  14. pantherclaw

    CHECK OUT THE SAINTS FORUM

    I watched the entire game. The Saints did not lose the game due to that 1 play.
  15. pantherclaw

    CHECK OUT THE SAINTS FORUM

    No, they didn't. They controlled the game the entire first half despite atrocious no calls. They let the Rams back into the game, despite atrocious no calls. They had MANY MANY opportunities to close out that game despite no calls all game long. The Saints failed to do so. So no, it shouldn't have even came down to the one play.
×