Jump to content
Carolina Huddle
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

OldNorthPowell

Hornets vs Bulls Part 1

Recommended Posts



Once again,  not getting what we need from Marvin and Batum.

I will say this is Lamb’s and Cody’s best games’ to date.

Kemba needs to take this one over, he’s been averaging 24 fga’s per game and only has six at the half while Marvin has eight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant get the game, i live out of market

 

But box score shows Bridges hasnt even played yet.

And Batum still struggling

How the fug do you not put the young guy in

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm traveling tonight so only tracking the score on my phone, but it would appear we are playing down to the level of a decimated Bulls team.  Any truth to this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kemba with an off night and nobody stepped up

bulls bailed out with foul call at the end

and friggin batum can’t throw it inbounds when we have a chance to win...he is just friggin terrible

cho just hosed us big time when he was GM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish we could just tank. Kemba isn't consistent enough to get 30 ppg, and sadly, we'll need that from him every night if we continue to depend on shitty Batum and shitty Marvin. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JakeDel5674 said:

I wish we could just tank. Kemba isn't consistent enough to get 30 ppg, and sadly, we'll need that from him every night if we continue to depend on shitty Batum and shitty Marvin. 

And lamb too....he offers nothing

coach even played bridges quality minutes tonight because lamb sucks so bad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This team is NOT a playoff team. I had hope. Even if we were the NBA would find a way to screw us over. They hate this area with a passion. Just move the team already. I got my Tar Heels with their 6 championships, I am good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      19,830
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    Stoney
    Joined
  • Topics

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      144,350
    • Total Posts
      4,713,621
  • Posts

    • I think it will take a 3 year deal to entice him. But if you can keep the signing bonus to lets say 10 million and guarantee year 1 salary of 4 million he gets his 14 million out of the gate and we guaranteed all of it. If we guarantee his second year salary of 7 million we are guaranteeing 21 million of his 30 million which is a ton but honestly he has shown to be consistent and productive. With KK and Poe with him they would be productive.  Year three is still a manageable 9 million although his cap would be 12.  Three years from now that will be a huge bargain.  
    • Yeah it sounds like we could afford him. The thing that makes me wary of a deal is that we could go one of two ways: 1. Sign a 1 year deal for $11-12 million with no long term risk if his age catches up to him or he starts wearing down from his injuries. This only makes sense if we think we are a DT away from super bowl contention this year because then we lose him next year and still don't have a succession plan after we invariably cut Poe and get rid of Butler. 2. We give him a 3 year, 30 million deal, but then if he starts showing his age or perhaps isn't as effective in our system, we're saddled with a decent sized contract for at least a couple years. Now suddenly we're paying 3 defensive tackles way more than they're worth while having holes to fill elsewhere in the roster. I was hoping he was looking at something in the 7-8 million range, in which case I'd say go for it. Once $11 million was leaked as the going price, I'm thinking we should bow out of this one and go for a more affordable option like Bailey if we still think we need to shore up the position. 
    • There has been a bill in the Congress of the USA for decades asking for reparations. YC or AM didn't invent the idea. What I find funny is that only Democrats are being asked to take positions on Reparations. How many Republicans sponsored that bill? ZERO. And no, none of them is asked a single question about it. The reparations issue is not a presidential issue (alone). Before the bill even make it to the desk of any president, it needs to go through the normal process in Congress, which will require 100 sponsors to make it to the floor. But strangely, none of the people running for office, who will be discussing this are even asked about it. And you want to tell me ... this is NOT about re-electing a Russian Agent? I really hope you actually understand how politics works in the USA.
×
×
  • Create New...