Jump to content
Carolina Huddle
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:

Recommended Posts

Great video breakdown. Let's let the preseason play out. Between injuries and 3 games we'll find out but I like the possibilities with a more power back for short yardage (who ever) on the team. 2 and 3 won't play much so I wouldn't too much in to it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


14 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Could’ve had CJ last year and let him walk... dude is better than everyone we have minus CMC. 

This. Still shocked that we didn't use any 2 back sets with both him and CMC on the field at the same time. 

 

Hell, could of thrown CMC in the slot, CJ as the back and RPO'd all day. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/18/2019 at 10:44 AM, 45catfan said:

We have on the roster as of right now (besides CMC) two former 5th round picks (both reaches

how someone can call a 5th round pick a reach is beyond me.....

  • Pie 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/18/2019 at 2:09 PM, 45catfan said:

They didn't really have a backup to Cam last season either.  Not to mention a legit backup to Greg either. That crap flew back in their face.  If this team's front office is ignorant not to learn from their past mistakes, then they deserve every loss they get from being utter numb skulls.  Skill positions you need a #1 and 1A not a #1 and 4 posing as a #2 just because the front office is incompetent.

I could have sworn we drafted a solid replacement player at TE... and I also believe he played exceptionally well as a rookie behind Greg. 

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

I could have sworn we drafted a solid replacement player at TE... and I also believe he played exceptionally well as a rookie behind Greg. 

The Panthers drafted a 4th round project TE, you are correct, but how solid remains to be seen.  You  may have saw exceptional play, I saw plenty of rookie mistakes although Thomas did play better as time went on.   He is nowhere close to what Greg offers.  So a complimentary TE, perhaps?  In terms of skill set and knowledge, Greg's replacement Thomas is not.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

how someone can call a 5th round pick a reach is beyond me.....

Easy, because nobody had CAP or Scarlet graded as 5th rounders.  Drafting a player before their projected round value is called a reach.

  • Pie 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, 45catfan said:

The Panthers drafted a 4th round project TE, you are correct, but how solid remains to be seen.  You  may have saw exceptional play, I saw plenty of rookie mistakes although Thomas did play better as time went on.   He is nowhere close to what Greg offers.  So a complimentary TE, perhaps?  In terms of skill set and knowledge, Greg's replacement Thomas is not.  

So we have already deemed that this kid will never be a good tight end? Also, so what would have been a good replacement of Greg then? Us spending millions on a backup tight end who would then serve as a backup until Greg gets hurt? Bc that’s how coaches and gm’s think.... this player WILL get hurt this year.... Cmon man, that’s is elementary thinking. Don’t be dumb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Easy, because nobody had CAP or Scarlet graded as 5th rounders.  Drafting a player before their projected round value is called a reach.

Is that how it works? You draft the player for your team based on how everyone else rates them? Disregard the scouts and the research they have been doin on these players since they were in high school? Again, more elementary thinking. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Is that how it works? You draft the player for your team based on how everyone else rates them? Disregard the scouts and the research they have been doin on these players since they were in high school? Again, more elementary thinking. 

CAP has done nothing to disprove that he was a reach in the 5th round. But he is also probably about average historically for a 5th rounder. Probably won't last long in the NFL after his contract is up here.

In my opinion, anything after the 4th round is pretty irrelevant. I may disagree on a "reach" guy, it really is highly unlikely to matter. Those later round picks rarely end up lasting past their rookie deals, if they even make it that far.

I was a little annoyed at the Scarlett pick because he was a later round projected guy but I kind of agree with the idea of gambling on guys with higher ceilings in the 5-7th rounds.

  • Pie 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People look at the CAP situation entirely wrong.  Looking back he was actually a decent pick for a 5ht rounder.  He filled it cheaply for 4 years. 

The problem is only 46 players are active on game days and they view him as a back up first down back.

Look at his early years, you had Stewart, Tolbert, and Fozzy.  He wasn't a backup to Fozzy and/or Tolbert he was the backup to Stewart.  If Stewart was hurt he became the starting primary RB.  They didn't need him active on game days if Stewart was health, even if Stewart got hurt you could let Tolbert handle those duties, not to mention we have a QB that could do some power running.  Even if he was "better" they wouldn't have him active because they have to sit someone.

Last year he backed up CMC and CJ.  Same thing, doesn't matter if he was a "better prospect" he isn't going to be active on game days.  That 3rd RB is a logical spot to make inactive on game days.  That is why I think filling it cheaply with a later draft pick is smart.  

I'm not saying you shouldn't try to upgrade, but I really don't think it was as bad of a pick as people think.  

People need to remember there are only so many carries to go around.  Even if you have 3 great RBs the coaches are still going to give the majority to the one that view as slightly better.  Playing CJ last year wouldn't have added to our rushing attack it would have just replaced what we already got out of CMC.  Even though I wouldn't mind seeing CMC having a bit of a reduced workload.

 

  • Pie 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      19,837
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    HardcoreHokie
    Joined
  • Topics

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      144,618
    • Total Posts
      4,724,480
  • Posts

    • I had a chance to catch up on everything that happened yesterday, and I just want to point something out.  That hearing yesterday was the result of the efforts of the ADOS movement online and the pressure we have put on this up coming election.  Yet ultimately, it was really an attempt to silence the movement altogether with a more watered down version of reparations.  Before I get into that, let me address Mitch McConnell old behind.   If this dried up prune don't get sit down somewhere.  Not only is it an insult of insults to essentially say Obama was our reparations, but he is acting like he voted for him.  Mitch said "We" elected the first African American president.  Who is we?  No, it was black Americans that elected Obama.  Now don't get me wrong folks, I'm not saying white Americans didn't vote for Obama.  Yet you should know by now I'm a "group" man.  I don't deal with individuals when it comes to the data.  Who did groups of people vote for?  Who did the majority vote for?  Black Americans voted well over 95% for Obama, turning red states blue.  Even before that, we lifted Obama over Hillary.  So how can Ol' Mitch give the nation credit for something that black Americans did themselves?  This fool didn't want Obama to be president.  Heck, he probably didn't even want all the Civil Rights legislation of the mid 20th century to take place.  Yet this fool is crediting himself and America for it.  It was black people who pushed those things through, and there were many white Americans who allied with us.  None of that equates reparations though. Now with that said, boy, this hearing that went on yesterday.  Sheeesh!  Some of y'all could be thinking 'Dag Matthias, reparations is getting the attention of Congress.  What more could you ask for'?  Well, as I said to open up, this hearing was more an attempt to shut the ADOS movement down.  You see the ADOS movement is demanding trillions of dollars in investments toward our specific group.  We are taking it to these Democrat candidates in demanding that kind of agenda, and we are gaining ground.  So Shelia Jackson Lee comes in with H.R.40, a commission to "study" reparations, but has no real commitment to giving reparations.  These candidates know that, and so giving their support as a front to having the reparations discussion.  So now they can tell us, "Look we support H.R.40.  So we have a black agenda for black America, we are giving you tangibles"!  It's all a farce. When you go in and listen to what most of them had to say yesterday, Sheila Jackson lee goes out of her way to say this isn't just about checks!  The witnesses who were pro-reparations, repeated that over and over again.  At one point, Ta'Nehisi Coates had to go out of his way and pretty much state that hey, lets not get rid of the check aspect of reparations here!  Coates was the only one who had the best understanding of what real reparations look like.  This is because he is more learned about what this country had done to us specifically.  So he understands there must be specific redress.  Everyone else was on that kidnapped Africans stuff and white supremacy as an ideology.  When it comes to what reparations looks like from the ADOS perspective, when we say it isn't just about checks, we are talking we want it all.  Reparations isn't an either/or.  It's not a "instead of doing checks, let look at job initiatives or tax credits".  We want it all.  We want the check, we want debt cancellation, we want grants, we want set asides, etc.  That is why the cost is in the trillions.  When you come to Shelia Jackson Lee and the CBC overall, they are puppets for the DNC.  They certainly don't want reparations to cost anything.  At best they will give is some sort of suited up version of Affirmative Action, that will benefit not just black Americans, but every one. Then you had folks like the Coleman Hughes guy, and that football dude who was popular among older football fans.  I'm thinking, who in the world invited these cats?  Then I remembered Republicans can invite their own people to testify.  So these guys were just idiots who didn't know data.  A lot of their testimony were simply their own personal experience.  Even I don't talk about my circumstances when speaking on reparations.  As I said, I'm a "group" man, I focus on what the data tells me.  That's what scientists do, not that I'm a scientist by the way. (Heehee!)  Overall this hearing was nothing but pomp, with the intention of stealing away all the reparations conversation away from the ADOS movement, who are discussing hardcore reparations and advocacy from our candidates.  It's not going to happen.  We already have a foothold in this thing, and our pressure is only going to increase.   We're going in circles.  Obama isn't ADOS.  His father was Kenyan, and mother was white.  He comes from wealth.  There were no real odds for him other than not being a household name when he began.  That colorblind speech he gave in 2004 at the DNC convention did help him though.
    • I'd be very surprised if there isn't some level of analytics involved in all of this. Even if it's that low level gut instinct kind. Sometimes high level analytics confirms your gut instinct, sometimes it doesn't. That's another value of analytics. The analyzing part.  It also breaks tells, habits because habits are not good in sports.
    • Unfortunately I think we had our magical season in 2015.  It doesnt get much better than that, and our fanbase was as hot as it can possibly be.  We need sustained success.  Only that will bring us where we want to be.
×
×
  • Create New...