No, I don't hate Cam, but if "didn't win anything" is your standard, those guys have as many Super Bowl rings as he does.
Objectively speaking, Newton was better than those guys, but that doesn't make them "average to mediocre" like you suggested. I could name you plenty of quarterbacks who aren't as good as Newton, but that doesn't make them bad.
Cutler was good, though attitude was an issue. Palmer was really good but got stuck playing for the Bengals most of his career. The only really "average to mediocre" quarterback you named in your list was Sam Bradford.
What you're showing me with your posts is you've got an awful lot of anger but not much football knowledge.