Jump to content
Carolina Huddle
  • Hey There!

    Please register to see fewer ads and a better viewing experience:100_Emoji_42x42:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

TruthVsComfort

Religious People Are Less Intelligent Than Atheists, Concludes New Study

Recommended Posts



Use the brain that God gave you! Just not too much

How about using the brain that developed over millions of years through natural selection and when diets increased protein intake started developing higher reasoning abilities that allows some people to choose to believe a bunch of old morality fairy tales are actually true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think superstition shows a lack of intelligence. And while there are a lot of superstitions attached to religious beliefs I think one can be religious and not be very superstitious.

 

I view superstition as a complete disregard of occam's razor.  It's merely a different way of looking at the world and can sometimes lead a person to new answers.  The trouble with ignoring the most simple answers is that it opens you up to a lot of wrong answers, though.

 

 

At this point I'm just rambling what pops into my head.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A quick search will reveal I listed just listed an office building at $1.49 M and Vacanf land zoned BC-1 for $875k just this morning, not exactly boarded up shacks and over $100k in commission when sold. FAIL!

 

A quick search will also reveal that you're full of poo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wonders where agnostics fit into the study...but I really don't care enough to read it

 

Exhibit A

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I view superstition as a complete disregard of occam's razor.  It's merely a different way of looking at the world and can sometimes lead a person to new answers.  The trouble with ignoring the most simple answers is that it opens you up to a lot of wrong answers, though.

 

 

At this point I'm just rambling what pops into my head.

 

 

Yes that but often the superstition is proven wrong yet still held.

 

ie: If I do A then B will happen. More often then not B doesn't happen yet the belief that B will happen is continued. That's shows the inability to learn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No matter what you say, I'm still going to wear my black panthers t-shirt on sundays during the season.  60% of the time, our 3rd down efficiency improves every time.

 

What you're describing sounds more like stubbornness, ie choosing to reject what you learn in favor of, dare I say, confirmation bias?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No matter what you say, I'm still going to wear my black panthers t-shirt on sundays during the season.  60% of the time, our 3rd down efficiency improves every time.

 

What you're describing sounds more like stubbornness, ie choosing to reject what you learn in favor of, dare I say, confirmation bias?

 

religious paradigms are almost always foisted on unwilling offspring through the process of socialization, and it's usually the systems wherein fundamentalist monotheistic ideologies are being passed on that this phenomenon is most readily observable. taught from a young age that X is indisputably, undeniably true, and that X's source is infallible and written by God with the power to save and damn, any young child's mind will close off to new sources of data, rejecting them in favor of a predetermined belief system, filtering them through what is already determined to be true.

 

the only intellectually honest way to derive a belief system is by making a calculated decision once all available data has been observed, but that of course is antithetical to most religious systems. thus, ignorance, confirmation biases, and the hereditary nature of wacky-ass things people believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't blame everything on childhood conditioning. 

 

Any lingering effect of this is usually wiped out by the time a child reaches adolescence, the time that children figure out that mom and dad and the local minister don't truly know everything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't blame everything on childhood conditioning.

Any lingering effect of this is usually wiped out by the time a child reaches adolescence, the time that children figure out that mompP and dad and the local minister don't truly know everything.

Exactly, forming your own original beliefs regardless of what has been taught and shown to you as a child is basically part of the experience of transitioning into adulthood and commonly takes place around college years .

My parents were very religious and I went to catholic schools all my life, yet I am a complete atheist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No matter what you say, I'm still going to wear my black panthers t-shirt on sundays during the season.  60% of the time, our 3rd down efficiency improves every time.

 

What you're describing sounds more like stubbornness, ie choosing to reject what you learn in favor of, dare I say, confirmation bias?

 

haha

 

I was going to use an example from religion but i didn't want my point to get derailed, so i was then going to go with jersey color and realized the same thing would happen :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't blame everything on childhood conditioning. 

 

Any lingering effect of this is usually wiped out by the time a child reaches adolescence, the time that children figure out that mom and dad and the local minister don't truly know everything.

 

A lot of people don't go beyond that conditioning though.  Yeah everyone realizes in adolescence that their parents don't know everything but they don't always go back and question everything all over again.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      19,830
    • Most Online
      2,867

    Newest Member
    Stoney
    Joined
  • Topics

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      144,350
    • Total Posts
      4,713,622
  • Posts

    • Norv Turners learning curve of offensive personnel & the typical OCs are not the same by a considerable margain...just saying
    • I think it will take a 3 year deal to entice him. But if you can keep the signing bonus to lets say 10 million and guarantee year 1 salary of 4 million he gets his 14 million out of the gate and we guaranteed all of it. If we guarantee his second year salary of 7 million we are guaranteeing 21 million of his 30 million which is a ton but honestly he has shown to be consistent and productive. With KK and Poe with him they would be productive.  Year three is still a manageable 9 million although his cap would be 12.  Three years from now that will be a huge bargain.  
    • Yeah it sounds like we could afford him. The thing that makes me wary of a deal is that we could go one of two ways: 1. Sign a 1 year deal for $11-12 million with no long term risk if his age catches up to him or he starts wearing down from his injuries. This only makes sense if we think we are a DT away from super bowl contention this year because then we lose him next year and still don't have a succession plan after we invariably cut Poe and get rid of Butler. 2. We give him a 3 year, 30 million deal, but then if he starts showing his age or perhaps isn't as effective in our system, we're saddled with a decent sized contract for at least a couple years. Now suddenly we're paying 3 defensive tackles way more than they're worth while having holes to fill elsewhere in the roster. I was hoping he was looking at something in the 7-8 million range, in which case I'd say go for it. Once $11 million was leaked as the going price, I'm thinking we should bow out of this one and go for a more affordable option like Bailey if we still think we need to shore up the position. 
×
×
  • Create New...