DaveThePanther2008

Reminds me of 2010 when the new collective bargaining agreement was still in process. We didn't sign anyone of substance and just carried over to 2011 when we drafted Cam.

This is absolutely insane. How the hell did anyone think a rookie QB is going to get this in a week? I've always thought that had we drafted Stroud he would have similar outcome as Young. Maybe win a game or so more because he's a bit harder to bring down than our featherweight QB. The difference in philosophy between Reich, Brown and Campen obviously played a big part.

With the lack of funds it is going to be difficult to sign Free Agents and keep Luvu and Burns. That said there is NO WAY Morgan accepts a 3rd for Burns. We would have to keep him. Maybe get a better offer in a trade at the trade deadline.

The audacity of him to say he wants partial ownership in the franchise that drafts him is what really annoys me. You are an unproven rookie with a big mouth. He'll run himself right out of the city that drafts him.

I sure the hell hope so. Other teams are signing their players they want to keep, and we haven't heard a peep out of our front office. It is starting to feel like all our free agents are looking to get the hell out of Carolina. Looks like 2024 is going to be a rough year.

Kris Jenkins 2.0 Another generation for the Carolina Panthers. I don't know much about the kid but would love to have KJ son on our team just for nostalgic reasons.

My reason, beyond the draft picks, that makes we want to get him traded. Evero seems to really know how to make the most out of what we have. I think we could find a FA that could fill the roll for a year or two while we build a new team. Evero will make the adjustment. Keeping Burns, though he is a very talented player, doesn't really help us move past the Rhule/Reich mess we have had. I think our best interest is signing and trading him or let someone offer him a deal through the NE franchise tag.

Definitely. I do think we need to get Derrick Brown signed before we deal with Burns. If we can somehow get an extension done with Brown, we now have more bargaining power with Burns. By signing Brown, we have control of Burns for the next 2 seasons.

I don't think he is as mediocre as many say on here, but I also don't believe he's a top-tier DE. He's worth keeping but not with an elite contract. The non-exclusive tag will show what other teams think he is worth. If no one is willing to give up draft picks for him than he and his agent will have to come down off the elite number. Maybe the best way to go about it is a reasonable contract with incentives that boost the salary. It motivates him to play hard and reach those milestones to get more money.

The non-exclusive tag gives Morgan the bargaining power if another team doesn't offer him a deal. We're able to get him at a better deal than he's asking for. His agent IMO is the driving force behind the top dollar deal he wants. If his agent is so damn good he should be able negotiate a deal with another team and get him what he wants.

Yeah I don't see us getting an offers for him.

I agree, but sadly we only have two picks on day two. I guess it would have to be BPA between these three groups (OL,WR,TE) or BPA on a player that dropped well below his initial grade.

If he lasts that long I would jump on it very quickly. His combine workout was stellar and some of the clips they showed he is extremely quick through traffic to make the tackle. I love this pic.

You would think Atlanta would have been paying attention to what we did the last couple of years. We went after retread after retread only to find out they weren't worth a damn. Fields is going to have to have a specific type of offense for him to thrive or a HC like Canales. NOT SAYING WE SHOULD SIGN HIM.

Only when people turn this into a RACE BAITING argument.

And whoever added the extra BS on my post is wrong. There are several posts on this board that post links to articles that are far more misleading than this one, which I don't believe mine was, but don't get the extra crap added to their posts. Maybe you should monitor all posts before they can be entered into the forum. You know censorship is such a great way to manage a forum. I could careless about clicks.

I see because I don't conform to your beliefs, I am therefore judged. Then again simple opinions from insignificant people don't really bother me.

YES

If Morgan doesn't go this way than he's probably not going to be much better than Fitterer. The non-exclusive tag allows Burns to test the market. If he gets his deal than we get 2 picks. If no one offers him what he is asking for than Morgan is in the driver's seat on a fair market offer. Makes no sense to Franchise Tag him and pay him more than what we think he's worth.

I know exactly why it was changed. A bunch of whiny people that have nothing better to do making issues out of nothing. It's a name. It was a name everybody loved or loved to hate.

And everyone that doesn't agree with you is a RACIST.

NO, YOU DO IT. Wow what a classic comeback. What are you 10 Y.O.? hahahahaha

I sure wish we'd use the non-exclusive tag on him. It would give us better bargaining power when no one offers him the money he's asking for.

If you say so. I'm going to drop this and stick to the topic. The Redskin name should come back for no other reason than it should have never been removed.

If we could get an additional pick this year and a 1st next year. I would jump at it. While the Lions will probably be in the playoffs next year making that pick a low first rounder. It would give us bargaining power if we needed to move up in the first round for an impact player.