top dawg

If the price is right...

I get it, math is good on paper. In a practical and historical sense, does it really make that big of a difference? Top 10 vs top one, for example, is the mathematical difference that huge, especially when juxtaposed against real results?

Great, but that doesn't answer the question within a historical context.

Yeah, but does having the FIRST pick give you that big of an advantage at the QB tree?

I'm just glad he'll get an opportunity. Much like others during the Rhule error, people mistaked being mishandled for sucking. TMJ doesn't suck, people. He plays bigger than he is also. I could be wrong, but I think Dez Bryant is kind of his ceiling.

I will say that if the defense can continue to play like it has, then the rebuild won't take nearly as long. We're going to have to re-sign a few players though.

I don't know what to tell ya. There was a reason they gave up so much to get Lance. If Garropolo didn't make the weekly boneheaded decision, he'd have probably won the 49ers a Super Bowl by now.

Huddlers will never believe this: Butker just missed an easy field goal.

Well that's the thing; people are trying to act like a top pick is s guarantee. It's not. It's simply not. Picking the wrong guy is just a part of the process. Hitting on that true franchise guy is really part research---they're all researched extensively---and part luck. That's why you have to keep on throwing darts until you hit.

The way that the Lions are now being the Lions, we will not be getting our choice of QB anyway.

In on every deal! If Lamar goes up for sale, we'll do our best within reason to get him. Whine and gnash teeth all you like, but there is no doubt about it.

It's not. Some may believe I'm crazy, but Hubbard might need to be the lead back and Foreman the third-down guy. And for the record, I've always thought that Hubbard's running ability was better than what people saying here were letting on, but his hands suck. If Hubbard could get his hands together, he'd be more than solid. All that being said, we need to draft someone to add to the competition next year.

I'm saying it cautiously: we may FINALLY be seeing the beginning of the demise of the GOAT. Also, don't underestimate our defense.

Sorry, if someone wants to give me two firsts or a first, second and a third for DJ...well, you know.

The team that showed up today might...At least I'm currently choosing to think so. Let me have my day.

I already did.

You can only play against who's on the schedule. Just saying.

Look, dude, if the price is right, he'd be gone. That's everybody. I've ALWAYS said that. But don't get crazy, one out of seven games does not exactly make you untouchable.

True dat!

This was arguably the best that we've seen by a QB since number 1 was hurt.

Don't get me wrong, I don't give Wilks much chance of losing the "Interim" label, but he mostly did a good job today. Mostly! He looked like an NFL coach today. Anyway, today should be the model as to why you spread the ball around, and actually let guys play as opposed to letting them waste away on the bench. If you open up the playbook, and let guys get an opportunity to execute, good things happen. Relying on one dude for so much of your offense (who is not the QB, of course) is NOT a formula for long term success, especially for a team without a franchise QB. These guys are in the NFL, and when it comes down to it, they should be allowed to contribute, particularly when things are going south and other people aren't getting it done. Great overall win. Nice game plan. Walker looked like a different guy today. If we can beat the Bucs, we should be able to beat just about anybody on any given Sunday.

Walker out there making Joe Montana throws.

Do NOT take your foot off the gas, Wilks!

I ain't gonna say "completely," but his age is catching up with him.

I get you...but, if the price is right...