top dawg

Keep sleeping on Matt Corral.

Been there done that. Strike three? No.

I know. I didn't click this thread for hours because I didn't know or care who Wills is.

Not really. You never get to maximize the potential of the cap because you're robbing from it years prior.

Are you being funny or what?

I read somewhere that Chinn is untouchable. No way we're giving up both. I'd be surprised to give up one.

I think you're right. I'll take YGM over Fox any day of the week.

Fox was JAG

Man, he was backing up King Henry very well the few times I saw him this year.

I was really impressed when I saw him play this year.

To be fair, the last year he played, he was arguably the best QB in the league based upon many metrics. He was just on a terrible team.

I seriously doubt it had anything to do with him being rich. Since he rightfully didn't say anything for his own good, all the grand jury had to consider was the evidence (or lack thereof). And, honestly, looking at that, there simply wasn't enough to convince most objective people that he did anything criminal.

The grand jury was swayed by whatever was presented to it, and that's pretty much all that matters. I get that some of you are damned set on believing whatever you want to believe--truth be damned--but thankfully that's not how grand juries work.

Notice that they didn't really ding Corral's skill level. Perhaps it was in part because he couldn't physically perform at the Combine, but I think it's because they know he has a likelihood of having the real stuff. I'm not sleeping on Corral. I know he's a wildcard, but at this point, he might be worth the risk. We will see. Like with CMC, my biggest issue with Corral is durability. But I think he can modify his game a little bit to give him a better chance of minimizing injuries

He just wants to get paid his worth, and we're not in a position to do it.

It's no mental gymnastics. Either someone is proven guilty or not in the eyes of the law. If he's guilty, he will ultimately be punished, unlike some who continue to get away with much worse.

I think more than half of America has moral deficiencies for one reason or another. But keep on cherry picking atop your high horse.

I see what you did there. I don't agree, but it was clever.

Gee whiz! Glad it ain't us.

Using political figures and those that support them is the best example I could use. The reason you don't see it is because you don't want to see it. And fug you for trying to call people POS human beings just because they would support Watson coming here if he is not deemed criminally liable. There's a reason for American jurisprudence. There's a reason for criminal and civil law. There's also a nuanced distinction between pervert and predator.

Yep! It's the lying season. I don't believe this poo for a moment. Rhule and company aren't going to push their chips in on one of the rawest prospects out there.

I mean, if being raw is a red flag, then the draft is mostly a bloody affair.

I feel the same on Watson. If he's not guilty of a crime, but is guilty of just being a young and dumb perv, I'll give him the grace that others won't give him, but who also give grace to those that have done way worse things in my opinion than him. And I don't think that makes either you or I bad humans because of it. Bad people have not been just getting breaks, but have been elevated as heroes throughout the history of this country.

Look, I have always appreciated you, Snow, and, no, I'm not calling you a racist, but I do think you're being hypocritical. And, perhaps more to the point, I think you're being way overly judgmental towards Huddlers who would want Watson IF he is not deemed a criminal. But getting back to hypocrisy and making value judgements based upon that, if you voted for either Trump or Biden, then you voted for--what some people would call--a sexual predator. Does that make you a POS human being? By your logic...