iamhubby1

15 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I'm a long time UM fan and Physically Brady wasn't even in the same ball park..

As a long time Spartan. I can endorse this statement.

19 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

If Corral is the future let Sam go. It doesn't benefit either guy. The option was a mistake and no way Sam should be the one Matt should be looking at as an NFL professional. Clean the QB room and start fresh.

I disagree with that bolded part. By all accounts, Sam is a true professional. There is a very real chance that Sam could be an excellent mentor. 

As a general rule. QBs are not the most eager of mentors.

2 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

What week does Corral get arrested 

what a terrible pick 

Then I guess you two have something in common. You both are terrible at something.

6 minutes ago, diddyb said:

Was only 2 options in my mind.  Draft Ickey if he is there or trade down.  Luckily Ickey was there

I know a lot of folks were looking for that trade down, but it never really had any footing. Glad Ikey was there, because we were pretty much stuck with 6.

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

This is gonna be hilarious to read later, like your offseason takes in 2021.

Not sure there is someone who is as consistent in being completely inaccurate. 

It really is EXTREMELY funny to watch you do this to yourself.

What's funny is you showing your total lack of knowledge by calling our improved Oline. "A bunch of Jags". Then followed that up with a poll designed to find like minded folks, that totally backfired on you. 

Now that right there is funny. I don't care who you are.

42 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I assume you are a last three years fan if you actually believe that.

Yeah, I'm sorry to say this, but if you can't see how vastly improved our line has become this Offseason. I don't think anyone can help you.

32 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah and if this pick works out, at least we have a base to build a good OL on when we have competent coaching again.

Lol a base to build around. lol  We are staring down the barrel of one of the best Olines in Panthers history. And you think it is only a start? lol

2 hours ago, frankw said:

You are so delusional that facts to you are "negativity". That's a you problem.

Everyone is happy, and enjoying talking about our much improved Oline. Then bam, in comes @frankw to rain on their parade.

You are so delusional, you don't even know you are being negative. And that ain't just a you problem.

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Yeah everything looks great until you see Darnold's mug looking right back at you.

1 hour ago, Raleigh PF said:

I'm happy with the pick. The Panthers have needed to shore up the line for years.

However, get ready for eight or even nine in the box all game long. Until the Panthers get a QB, it's a one-dimensional team and that doesn't change with either Mayfield or Garoppolo.

Not one night? You guys can't leave the negativity out for one lousy night? This place is as happy as it's been in a year. But you guys just can't have that can you? smh

With this thread, @hepcat is the leader in the Club House with his 10th "I ain't happy, and I want folks to know it" thread.

When reached for comment Mr. @hepcat stated "Well, you know. I looked around me and I thought to myself ""There's just not enough negativity up in here."" So I wanted to do my part". 

As far as this writer is concerned. Mr. @hepcat hit the mark.

Guys who love the game say, "I'm willing to do anything Coach". The guys in it for the money say, "This is what I'm willing to do Coach".

10 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

Most Passing Yds/TD’s as a three year starter in ACC HISTORY…

Well, that settles it. Howell it is then.

14 hours ago, Michael G said:

Its a snapshot. His stats are not horrible. Better Comp % 2 years ago, More TD's and Yards 3 years ago. Then figuring in the improved rushing this year--its not all regression unless you are lookin g at it in a limited fashion. The kid makes adjustments to his game, has some tools, and is a dog. IMO He is not the most polished prospect-he was some flaws fore sure-- but there are some positive traits to work with. 

18 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

I think you should google before posting…

Oh, give me a break. If those stats were reversed? Folks would be drooling over the kid. 

Every metric except Comp% went down every year. And that went up, then back down. 

Praise the guy for what he is. But the stats don't back the rest up.

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Add up the draft pick value of our picks we've spent on offense vs. defense. 

We spent a 2nd on Marshall

We spent a 3rd on Christensen

We brought in Corbett, Bozeman, and Royce

That is a far cry from your assertion that "Under Rhule we've spent all our draft assets on D while trying to build an O off the NFL's trash heap."

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

If…..

1st round. - Defense 

4th round - Defense 

5th, 6th and 7th round all offense 

you would call that an offensive draft.  More offense than defense. It wouldn’t be investing in the O with our draft capital. 

Rhule has used our draft capital to date on our D. 

 

Did you read his post? This is what he said. "Under Rhule we've spent all our draft assets on D while trying to build an O off the NFL's trash heap." 

We used a 2nd, and a 3rd on Offense. But I guess those 2 picks don't count. lol

How can we have 5 Offensive Draft picks, and at least 3 quality FA, while spending all our draft capital on D, and trash bin diving?

You folks kill me. Make up a fact, and expect to get away with it.

6 minutes ago, Basbear said:

hubby how are spending draft day? like food and booze wise?

Thursday is golf day. Not sure I'll even watch it. But I might check this place out depending on how it goes. You?

1 minute ago, CRA said:

We have had 5 picks in the first 2 rounds under Rhule and 4 of the 5 have been defense.  Including 2 top 10 defensive players. 

he is right.  

AW, did you need to come to his rescue?

5 Offensive picks in last years draft. 3 well respect Offensive FA this year. But hey, you guys are the bomb.

You guys will spin anything to fit your agenda. Face facts, we have spend resources on Offense. And Georgie Boy said otherwise. Him wrong. But I guarantee he will not admit it.

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Cool.

I thought it would be obvious that "all" didn't mean literally "all" but you do you.

But, you're done and you're not mad, right?

Do the math. I'll be shocked if it doesn't come out 4:1 D:O in a completely offensively driven league.

Way to spin that BS. You are good at it. Have you ever in your life ever accepted you made a mistake? I don't think you could.

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Add up the draft pick value of our picks we've spent on offense vs. defense. 

Way to walk it back. You claimed "Under Rhule we've spent all our draft assets on D while trying to build an O off the NFL's trash heap." Which is categorically wrong.

After being called out. You want to bring out a chart. lol

51 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Why would anyone be shocked? 

Under Rhule we've spent all our draft assets on D while trying to build an O off the NFL's trash heap.

 

We did draft 5 Offensive players last year. We also brought in 3 well respected vets this year.

But hey, don't let facts get in the way of your agenda.

4 minutes ago, Icege said:

I think that Joe got flattened by the proverbial bus.

Rhule didn't put any experienced NFL offensive play-callers on his staff to help guide Joe, nor did he seem to actually understand the type of offense that Joe wanted to run and whether or not it fit with what Rhule's vision of the team overall was.

Joe had some Andy Reid-esque type moments in that he made some very, very bad playcalls in some crucial moments, but his offense never got the opportunity to be displayed behind a competent OL. If that was a selling point, then he definitely failed. If that was just the way the chips fell, then he got the short end of the stick for sure.

McAdoo's offense boasts high percentage throws to playmakers in space (which is what we heard re: Brady's offense). The current selling point is that in his first year as Eli's OC he cut the interceptions nearly in half and almost doubling his TDs. He also coached Eli to his highest career completion percentage at the time. Hopefully he can do even better with Sam, but we'll have to wait and see if he can produce a miracle.

I would say it's safe to say that Sam pretty much has this year to salvage his career. With all the help we have given him, or have yet to give him. There really is no excuse.

That's if it's Sam this year. This team is set up pretty well for a QB. Whether it's Sam, or whomever.

1 minute ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Guy is literally one of the worst homers. Willing to settle for Darnold. That is how bad this fanbase has fallen. 

Don't put words in my mouth. That some other guys job. I have never said I wanted to settle for Sam. 

2 minutes ago, Icege said:

Oh, I get it. I took a break for a few weeks myself. While we can't control others, fans do have a lot of valid reasons to be frustrated. Personally, I'm incredibly excited to see what the offense will look like with an experienced play-caller as well as an actual NFL-calibre OL (Erving/Jordan/Elflein/Daley are all back-ups if the team gets a top 3 LT at #6, and Miller is straight up gone). On the other side of the ball, the pass rush has definitely taken a step back with the loss of Reddick, but the pass defense overall should be okay with the return of Horn + DJack.

We're going to have a lot more to scream into the void about for the draft. I can't wait.

The pieces are there. Whether it makes paste or sauce is the question.

It's a great situation for a QB. Decent Defense. Improved Oline, especially if we get lucky. Upgraded Coaching. Upgraded RB room. It very well could work.

Or not. That's the great thing about sports. Damm near infinite possibilities.

Just now, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

What do people want to get out of trashing Sam? Actually curious about that one.

Me too. I mean dang, why does it seem so personal?