X-Clown

I never read the Sanjay guys’ posts, but that sounds terrible

No response to any of my posts on this logic, he knows he is in over his head in discussing actual football. It’s almost like he knows nothing about it, and joined the board because he’s a fan of the owner instead of the team or the NFL.

Parcels was saying that about the team, not specifically the quarterback. Which is hilarious given how much you love to prop up Matt Rhule and ignore his record which speaks pretty loudly about who he is. By your definition, Matthew Stafford’s career record with the Lions of 74-90-1 means that he’s a loser. I wonder why the Rams decided to trade for him since their previous QB had a much better winning record of 42-27 with a Super Bowl appearance and other playoff appearances.

Lol, it’s bad enough that you can’t display critical thinking to just post WINZ WINZ WINZ like it’s literally only the two QBs on the opposing sides of the field who are playing one on one in football, but now you are posting those stats from years before Shanahan even coached the niners.

I mean, he's really fantastically smart for proving his point by posting repeatedly that "Jimmy is a winner" and adding a few emjois to it to really show his superiority

Jared Goff was too….and yet the Rams couldn’t wait to that trade that “winner” for a “loser” like Matthew Stafford.

To just automatically say nope that guy can’t succeed because he went to a school on the west coast as opposed to playing in the SEC is pretty lazy dude and you know it. Ask the dolphins if they want a redo in taking Tua over Herbert if that was really the deciding factor. Regarding your second paragraph, I’m expecting you to show your work because you there the take out there. Otherwise, off the top of my head I can name Herbert, Rodgers, Luck, and Derek Carr.

So we shouldn’t have drafted Justin Herbert a few years ago?

That's like saying that Bill Belichick couldn't be a good coach because he wasn't a good football player.

Jimmy G and Baker are likely two of them, maybe the Golden Calf of BYU as the third.

I think it's just top 40 coming into this season. Who would you take right now if it was based upon expectations for this season. If it was career to date, Brady would be #1 ever year, but was 10th on last year's list. He had Darnold as #19 on the list last year.

He’s coming here with Payton isn’t he?

Whitehurst was in Seattle, but he’s right that they gave Flynn a deal in free agency and he was the presumed starter before russell crushed it in training camp/preseason

If you were there, you know how good the atmosphere can be

Tomlin only has one

Heartbreaking.

Don’t worry he probably still believes that we are trading for Deshaun Watson

Jimmy G was taken in the second and traded for a second rounder 4 years later. Brissett was a third rounder and traded straight up for Philip Dorsett who averaged like 20 yards a game. Not sure how those moves justify taking a backup qb in the second when there are other players who can help your team now.

Good

This is all fair. Just the idea that he wasn’t worth the pick because roughly 3/4 of the teams who had their plan set before the draft “passed on him twice or more” is what I take exception to.

Name a time that this actually has worked (especially since this QB won’t play to show that he’s worth anything unless your starter is injured).

You do if you believe you already have your franchise QB and want to build around him to maximize the window of opportunity that exists before putting the eggs in the basket of an unknown quantity. Here are the other team's situations, I'll put a star beside teams that realistically were expecting to draft a QB Buffalo - Has a franchise QB locked in New England - Just drafted a QB in the first last year Miami - Spent a top 5 pick two years ago on a new QB, it's a make or break year for him New York Jets - Spent a two pick on a QB last year Cincinnati - Has a franchise QB locked in Pittsburgh* - Needs a QB and drafted one in the first round Cleveland - Just gave up a haul to get a franchise QB Baltimore - Have a franchise QB Tennessee* - Tannehill is a question mark enough that Tennessee drafted Willis. You could argue that this may not have been their plan. Indianapolis - Just traded for Matt Ryan. Houston - Just drafted Mills in the 3rd last year, showed enough promise to get a chance to lead during a rebuild Jacksonville - Just drafted a QB number one last year Kansas City - Has a franchise QB locked in Las Vegas - Just extended Carr LA Chargers - Has a franchise QB locked in Denver - Just traded for a franchise QB Dallas - Is paying a good QB like a franchise QB Philadelphia - Hurts was a 2nd rounder two years ago, like Tua he is in a make or break year WFT* - Just traded for Carson Wentz, who they will find out shortly is not a franchise QB. Took a flyer on Howell. NY Giants* - Giving one more try to top 10 pick Daniel Jones with a new coaching staff. Green Bay - Franchise QB that's getting paid 50 million because they pissed him off by trying to find his replacement Minnesota - Just extended Cousins Chicago - Just drafted a QB in the first round last year Detroit* - seem content to use Goff as the bridge QB while they rebuild the rest of the team. Good luck with that. Tampa - Have the GOAT back again and used a 2nd rounder on a QB last year New Orleans* - Guess they want to stick with Jameis? Not sure what they'e doing to be honest Atlanta* - Took Ridder in the 2nd round LA Rams - Just won a superbowl and extended Stafford Arizona - Just mended fences with Murray, no way they were going to take a QB high 49ers - Traded 3 first rounders last year to get a QB Seahawks*- Looks like a complete rebuild after trading Wilson, I guess. I count 8 other teams that were possibly looking at drafting a QB high, not 31 of them.

Do all 32 teams think they needed a QB in the first 2 rounds of this years draft? How many of them did Need a highly drafted QB?

Or things are just overlooked altogether (Mac jones)

Talk about hitting the nail on the head. Fitterer must have read this post!!