-
Posts
505 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by theinstrumental
-
Moving on to the 2nd round discussion
theinstrumental replied to flagfootballcoach28's topic in Carolina Panthers
I didn't, he just feels more like a 4-3 only edge. The other guys are a little more athletic. -
Round 1 - Panthers Select Tetairoa McMillan at Pick 8
theinstrumental replied to Bear Hands's topic in Carolina Panthers
They should work well together. T-Mac: big, sideline-operating, go-up-and-get it player who threatens vertically by creating big windows at the catch point along the sideline. XL: freak athlete, designed touch, YAC and tackle-breaking on short/intermediate routes over the middle. XL looks like a traditional X but has the skill set of a Z: he’s not super refined but almost nobody his size moves as well as he does. He seems overqualified for his role, but that’s a good thing. The offense can generate different types of big plays now. -
Moving on to the 2nd round discussion
theinstrumental replied to flagfootballcoach28's topic in Carolina Panthers
We need to hit on a defender. Hoping for one of the Landon Jackson/Nick Scourton/JT Tuimoloau big EDGE guys. Not the most dynamic guys, but it seems like they’ll all have ten-year careers as useful players. -
Round 1 - Panthers Select Tetairoa McMillan at Pick 8
theinstrumental replied to Bear Hands's topic in Carolina Panthers
Love it! He's an actual first-rounder, and the defensive prospects aren't. Easy choice.- 651 replies
-
- 12
-
-
-
-
Can’t believe everyone just spent three months talking about how abnormally flat this draft was, and then got pissy when we considered trading back for less than normal. Gotta play the hand you’re dealt. Bad top of the draft, bad offers. Still gotta do what’s best for a roster that has a lot of holes.
-
Omarion Hampton is a very good running back prospect, but Ashton Jeanty completely breaks the scale compared to the rest of the class. It is hard, as someone with no dog in this fight, to believe that all the Carolina fans are simply being perfectly objective and reasonable when they try to equate Hampton to the dude who just had an all-time great season.
-
ESPN mock apr 21. About 12pm
theinstrumental replied to raleigh-panther's topic in Carolina Panthers
I'm not into Fannin at all, but the rest looks fine. In the fifth, they had Dont'e Thornton and Cam Jackson going with the picks right after ours. I'd prefer both to Korie Black/Jordan James. I know we've met with Cam Jackson a couple times. -
All three of those guys are absolute freak athletes. Jason Witten has the worst weight-adjusted speed out of any of them, and he still beat out 88% of all tight end prospects. Kelce: 90th percentile speed score. Olsen: 99th. It's always possible to find a few exceptions, but it's very rare for a tight end to be productive without insane athleticism. For that reason alone, I'd be pretty annoyed with selecting Warren at 8. You'd be betting on a huge historical outlier.
-
To put the question simply: Would you be happy with a Steelers trade that doesn't bring back their first-round pick next year? A potential trade between us and Pittsburgh is interesting because depending on which draft value chart you use, Pittsburgh has two totally natural trades available to them, but they're very different. The Jimmy Johnson chart says the difference between us at 8 and them at 21 is 600 points, or almost exactly the value of the last pick in the 1st round. That falls in line with how teams tend to discount future picks. 8 for 21 and next year's Pitt 1st is almost exactly equal. More modern charts (Chase Stuart, Fitz) are much flatter, and 8 for 21 and 83, Pittsburgh's next pick this year, are basically equal. Now, the second one obviously won't actually happen--the Lions had to include pick 73 just to move from 29 to 24 last year, and Pittsburgh would clearly be making a much bigger jump. But given the flatness of this draft and the lack of blue-chip players at the top, would you accept some mix of 21, 83, and next year's non-first-rounders from Pittsburgh, or would you want Dan Morgan barred from every touching the draft again for accepting anything less than next year's first?
-
God forbid this is the way the Draft shakes out
theinstrumental replied to SaltAndPepper's topic in Carolina Panthers
That’s fine, just don’t make blanket statements about positional value, then. -
God forbid this is the way the Draft shakes out
theinstrumental replied to SaltAndPepper's topic in Carolina Panthers
1. QB 2. RT 3. WR 4. TE 5. WR So, uh, four of the top-five are pass-catchers or the guy throwing them the ball. I don’t think you’re making the point that you think you’re making. -
God forbid this is the way the Draft shakes out
theinstrumental replied to SaltAndPepper's topic in Carolina Panthers
The Bengals made the Super Bowl? The Eagles made the Super Bowl before Saquon, but only after AJ Brown and DaVonta Smith? Am I taking crazy pills? Guys, I get that the trenches matter, but you can’t act like it’s the only thing that matters. The NFL clearly thinks that receiver is a premium position, including, yes, the team that won the Super Bowl. -
God forbid this is the way the Draft shakes out
theinstrumental replied to SaltAndPepper's topic in Carolina Panthers
The NFL tells everyone exactly how much they value every position when they hand out free agent contracts. Receivers are making $35M a year, it’s a premium position. -
BH's Round 1 (+Full Panthers) Mock
theinstrumental replied to Bear Hands's topic in Carolina Panthers
Agreed, I think Membou and Campbell being the top two tackles gives us the best hope for someone to trade up. San Francisco could be another option. I also hope that T-Mac stays in a tier of his own at WR and we could try to find a receiver-needy team who'd pay a little for the certainty that they'd get him. -
BH's Round 1 (+Full Panthers) Mock
theinstrumental replied to Bear Hands's topic in Carolina Panthers
Everybody’s been screaming for a trade-down all off-season. If they can an offer this way, they should take it -
BH's Round 1 (+Full Panthers) Mock
theinstrumental replied to Bear Hands's topic in Carolina Panthers
Thanks for the great post! Can you say why you prefer Brinson to Stackhouse? Same team, same-ish position, but Stackhouse started and got more of the playing time over the nose on those teams. -
Panthers re-sign Raheem Blackshear
theinstrumental replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
Not by much. Spotrac has his deal at $985K—the rookie minimum is $885K. Now that draft pick can be used at a more expensive position. -
Panthers re-sign Raheem Blackshear
theinstrumental replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
Raheem Blacksear is not going to prevent us from drafting a back if we like a guy in the late rounds. And with this deep RB class, I expect draftable guys to be available as UDFA’s. We’ll pick up one of those guys to compete for the spot. -
As of today, who would you draft at number 8?
theinstrumental replied to PleaseCutStewart's topic in Carolina Panthers
He jumped pretty badly and didn’t bench. Not a lot of evidence that there’s elite power to his game. Also seems like an “it’s always something” off-field guy, but nothing anybody would put their name behind or make specific. -
As of today, who would you draft at number 8?
theinstrumental replied to PleaseCutStewart's topic in Carolina Panthers
Jahdae Barron. Bringing plus physicality at a position where it’s normally scarce is an impactful swing. He’s going to help the character of whatever defense he’s on. I’d prefer a d-lineman, but there likely isn’t one worth 8, and there are so many in the middle rounds. Just get a dude who helps. -
Bill Barnwell Panthers mock draft trades
theinstrumental replied to Peon Awesome's topic in Carolina Panthers
I'll really hate it if they're thinking this way at all. If they don't feel good about Evero, they need to just fire him. If they're going to keep him, not align the personnel with the strategy, and then fire him when it inevitably doesn't work, then I'm going to lose faith completely.