Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

About those corners...


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Cracka McNasty said:

we beat the broncos in the Super Bowl with a better offensive Gameplan, not by adding more players to the mix. Prevent Remmers from being on an island with Miller, stop running up the gut every first down, and run more read option to keep the edge rushers honest. 

Also not turning the ball over would help tremendously.

I truly felt that we were the better overall team, we just didn't play like it that day. 

They were sending 5 or 6 almost every play and daring our WRs to beat their coverage. Their entire defensive game plan was designed to keep our OTs on an island and it worked. Wade Phillips bet that their blitzes would beat our protection before our WRs beat their coverage and he was exactly right. Wasn't really much game planning that would have fixed our issues. We just finally went up against a defense that could just plain out talent our offense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The more I'm looking into these guys, I really like Bradberry and Sanchez.  Would have been nice to have some type of addition on the offensive line depth wise but we can still find some good adds.  The team is well rounded.  Slightly light at safety and OL depth but we're in good position. 

Sanchez learning more skills from Boykin could be awesome.  Bradberry may be on the outside sooner than people expect IMO.  2nd round pick for a reason. 

Edited by davos
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Bartin said:

They were sending 5 or 6 almost every play and daring our WRs to beat their coverage. Their entire defensive game plan was designed to keep our OTs on an island and it worked. Wade Phillips bet that their blitzes would beat our protection before our WRs beat their coverage and he was exactly right. Wasn't really much game planning that would have fixed our issues. We just finally went up against a defense that could just plain out talent our offense.

As an offense you have to dictate what the defense does. Bring the whole fuging house. I'll throw screens all day, it's not that they are more talented, this team cannot make adjustments man

Edited by Swaggasaurus
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dugbug said:

You are going by generic media boards that do not take into consideration team-specific systems.  GMan's board is based on value as a panther, and you should never think about what other boards have just get your guy at your value.

So why are people making fun of Tampa for taking a kicker?

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, dugbug said:

because Tampa.

But if they value that player as a 2nd round pick, then that's all there is to it-its a terrific decision, and what other teams think shouldn't have any effect on their draft board.

Edited by Growl
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Growl said:

But if they value that player as a 2nd round pick, then that's all there is to it-its a terrific decision, and what other teams think shouldn't have any effect on their draft board.

There is a difference when the GM of the year, who consistently is graded C- by the media for his drafts, creates a world-beater team out of said drafts.  Then, you know, tampa.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dugbug said:

There is a difference when the GM of the year, who consistently is graded C- by the media for his drafts, creates a world-beater team out of said drafts.  Then, you know, tampa.

oh okay so this is about how golly gee awesome we are.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Growl said:

So why are people making fun of Tampa for taking a kicker?

That's a good point.

I will tell you, however, in the 2nd Round discussion thread that I was insane enough to defend that choice. :P

(The Raiders used a 1st rounder on Sebastian Janikowski in what? 2000?  People were shocked by that pick (and it was a shocking pick).  Was he worth that pick in the year 2000?  Not even close.  Has he made that pick worthwhile over his 16 year NFL career?  AB-SO-LUTELY (IMO).  I see Aguayo in the same category using the same lens.)

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SupercaMVP said:

We are pretty fuging golle gee awesome, aren't we?

I think Conference Champions and teams that go to the SuperBowl tend toward the "golle gee awesome".

But that's just me.  I guess its others prerogative to think teams like that suck if they want. :P

  • Pie 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...