Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Everything we know about Cam's reaggravated ankle


Cam's New Arm

Recommended Posts

Looks like lil' ankie ain't doing well..

Quote

Five days after reporters were told by Carolina Panthers head coach Ron Rivera not to worry about franchise quarterback Cam Newton’s foot, Newton missed practice because he re-aggravated the left foot he sprained in Week 3 of the preseason during the loss Thursday night to Tampa Bay.

General manager Marty Hurney confirmed the injury after the practice gates closed with no Newton present on Tuesday morning.

“He’s in the training room, rehabbing,” said Hurney, who added that he did not know the play on which Newton was injured.

CLICKY CLICKY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://theriotreport.com/cam-newtons-misses-practice-status-unclear-for-sundays-game-vs-cardinals/?fbclid=IwAR2kZela7R8S_qLXeeo7YGytPsrtNS_DHwu8xpIeQFL3I2zfTMZ0CF5KYlQ

Quote

Cam Newton missed Tuesday’s practice as he reaggravated the same foot he injured during the Panthers’ Week 3 preseason game against the New England Patriots. General Manager Marty Hurney talked to a small group of reporters outside of Panthers practice on Tuesday morning and let them know that Newton was rehabbing inside the facility as opposed to attending practice.

“We are going to take it day-to-day,” Hurney said.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/cam-newtons-status-reportedly-up-in-the-air-for-week-3-after-re-aggravating-foot-injury/?fbclid=IwAR3oJD78PZ4tLpsVOnAFFSxLBKN3IEBecvoYC2Sq4gR9MmPdZhSNf-mXtyI

Quote

According to Tom Pelissero, quarterback Cam Newton's status for Sunday's matchup with the Arizona Cardinals is up in the air after he re-aggravated a foot injury. He spent Tuesday's practice rehabbing.

Panthers general manager Marty Hurney told reporters that Newton informed the team of the foot flare-up following Thursday night's loss to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, per Adam Schefter. The team does not have a solid timeline for when Newton will be able to return to the field, but the Panthers left the door open for him playing on Sunday, saying they "will see how it goes." 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Basically, the most important point of it is that it was Newton who informed them that the injury was "reaggravated".

this is all BS. 

Cam's play the last 2 weeks essentially confirm that wheel has been injured..  This whole, he hurt it after the game but we totally fine in the actual games is junk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to lie, i kind of feel like if we clean house after this season, then we need to look into a new training staff as well. This is a lot like Greg last season, "He's ready to go back out and play" and then next thing we know he hurt the same thing again but worse. It seems to be a fairly common trend with this staff and coaches to rush players back from injury before they should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...