Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Youtube TV

Shocker

By Shocker,
in Nerdvana

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So....Youtube TV adding NFL Network and for an additional fee Redzone.  Nice, but still 10 bucks more than Fubo TV so its debatable, especially if Fubo TV goes up (rumored to go to 60 soon).

Fubo TV - 55 but with Redzone 67...Fubo added ESPN recently which is awesome

Youtube TV 65 but with Redzone 77 (ouch)

Those 2 are the best but getting expensive 

Also, if you sign up for Fubo TV and go to cancel they will give you the first month for 9.99.  50 bucks savings is nice.

Streaming wise both are pretty flawless...Fubo TV does have some 4k sports so added value but limited DVR.  Youtube TV is unlimited DVR if thats your thing.

Hulu TV is lagging behind in streaming quality and honestly their ad model is killing it for me.  Way to many ads.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NanuqoftheNorth Grand Master

NanuqoftheNorth

Posted
Posted

Any viewer package offering major professional/college sports is going to charge significantly more than those that don't.

I love watching NFL football and other sporting events, but not enough to spend a small fortune for the privilege.

I'll continue to watch as long as they're broadcast free over the air, but if that goes away I'll fill my free time with other activities.  Too many alternatives to be held ransom by greedy sports leagues and broadcasters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Yep, just cancelled last week. That price hike was just too much to ask. Might as well go with a cable company at that point. 

This has totally crossed my mind as well.  I am paying 75 dollars for internet with Spectrum so I would probably save money going with a bundle.  :eyeroll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
NanuqoftheNorth Grand Master

NanuqoftheNorth

Posted
Posted

Philo may be a good alternative for some:  $20.00/month w/63 stations and Cloud DVR.

https://www.philo.com/login/subscribe?ref=try.philo.com&utm_source=google&utm_medium=search&utm_campaign=topbrand&utm_term=philo-761&utm_content=topbrandexact&utm_content_id=&gclid=Cj0KCQjwxNT8BRD9ARIsAJ8S5xY2nJuts0syze2vdNIdQZdKLAu49A-SBaX0BXuQZUCIMDvesD9upkIaAnqBEALw_wcB

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NanuqoftheNorth Grand Master

NanuqoftheNorth

Posted
Posted

Tablo is a digital DVR for over the air digital broadcasts.  You have to buy the device  $99-$150.00.  There is also an optional $5.00/monthly fee for a two week on screen program guide.  https://www.tablotv.com/.  

I get about 25 stations via antenna, all the major networks, superstations, some movie channels, older TV shows, some sports stations and several others. 

Also have Netflix, Prime, Philo and Acorn.

There is way more quality content than I've time to watch and I'm still saving over $100.00 each month by dropping cable TV. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
nctarheelreincarnated Newbie

nctarheelreincarnated

Posted
Posted
On 10/3/2020 at 11:44 AM, Varking said:

YouTube TV just killed regional sports on Fox Sports as well. From here on out you will see the  Nationally televised game. Per their subreddit. 

Hulu killed regional Fox Sports channels too. Whoever owns those channels are beyond moronic, as YTTW and Hulu are 10% of their revenue. Sinclair is the owner by the way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • top dawg
      Smith Sr. & Zierlein discuss their top 10 WRs

      By top dawg · Posted

      Any QB worth his weight in gold is going to get his guys the ball. Of course he has to have the protection, coaching and experience to do that. Moreover, it has yet to be determined what type of situation this is for a rookie wideout. The most important thing that will determine that is coaching.
    • rayzor
      Smith Sr. & Zierlein discuss their top 10 WRs

      By rayzor · Posted

      I watched it this afternoon and I thought some of the best discussions was before it even got to the players. One thing that really jumped out to me was when Smitty was asked about how things have changed since he played and the thing he talked about was how when he played and going back to Jerry Rice says, the #1 targeted or looked to receiver was always the X and there's still a lot of people who's minds are still stuck in that idea. But what has happened is that the, what he calls, the F receiver...the flanker...is now the go to guy. You need the X to try and get safeties out of the box, but the QB is now looking for his flanker most of the time. Lots of good discussions all through it, but for some reason the ones involving Ladd, Corley, and Leggette was the most interesting. Ladd was how he may be best fit for just the slot, but he's the best slot guy in the draft and he's just a guy who gets open and doesn't drop the ball. Corley and Leggette are playmakers who are at a risk of being pigeonholed. Leggette is too stiff to be a slot guy but he can do things like Metcalf. Corley is likely to be used much as he was in college, as the big playmaker you just get the ball in his hands however you can, but he's got a lot of room for development as a receiver. It's just good football talk all the way through  
    • ClawOn
      Ask The Old Guy: We will, we will mock you

      By ClawOn · Posted

      I'd resigned myself to 2000 and never.   Cautiously optimistic based on this off season that 2026 is a real possibility. 
×
×
  • Create New...