Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Talk to me about Trask


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

He runs a 5.12 40 so you'll get Ryan Mallett comparisons. 

Buuuut he has a bit more NFL level traits.  I've been leaning on the "take a stab at him" side of things but prefer Wilson as the #3 QB.

Trask & Lance are the ones I'm having trouble parsing out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

From the little I have seen from him, the only knock on Wilson is his frame.  He has to get bigger in the NFL.  And I would be cool with that if he sits a year

def a concern.  i get nervous every time teddy twig legs has defenders near him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Kyle Trask is not Patrick Mahommes. Not even close. 

Trask is like the 6th best QB in this draft, and thats not a knock on him. The QB class is stacked like no other, might be a better draft PROSPECT wise than even 1983. If your team is needy for a QB and you pick in the the top half of the first round you should find a quality one, and smart teams will pick one instead of some dumb poo like a Florida State DT thats gonna end up being totally mediocre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, saX man said:

He runs a 5.12 40 so you'll get Ryan Mallett comparisons. 

Buuuut he has a bit more NFL level traits.  I've been leaning on the "take a stab at him" side of things but prefer Wilson as the #3 QB.

Trask & Lance are the ones I'm having trouble parsing out. 

I honestly don't think he has much of a chance to be any higher than the 5th QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

So basically he Jimmy Clausen?

I wouldn't say that. Trask is kinda the opposite. Clausen was a one year wonder in college after being hyped through HS as the next Joe Montana. That dude was HYPED. Trask is a late boomer who just started to emerge last year. Trask has a better chance than Clausen simply because he sees the field better and throws with a lot more anticipation. Clausen was a wait and see it develop first QB who lacked the physical tools to deliver on it. If you're going to wait in the NFL, you better have elite talent (prime Cam being a good example).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Untouchable said:

It looks like all scheme and playmakers propping Trask up to me.  He lobs the ball into a wide open zone/receiver, lobs to a mismatch WR/TE (Pitts and others) who wins the 50/50 ball, or throws a bubble screen to Toney who does all the work for him. 

You've spoken a lot of truth IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

If we dont get Mitch Trubisky we may as well not draft Patrick Mahommes

Trask is a 2nd tier QB in this draft. There are 4 top tier QB prospects -- Lawrence, Fields, Lance/Wilson in that order. I completely agree with you about still going for a QB if we miss on Lawrence/Fields (which we will) but don't agree that Trask is one to target in the 1st if we miss out on the others. If all 4 are somehow gone before we pick I would not reach for Trask; take BPA and then look at other QBs later. In my opinion though, that's incredibly unlikely. I'll think we'll have 1 or both of Lance/Wilson sitting there for the taking, and we need to jump on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is from 5 months ago. It was one or the other. Trade for one or draft one. We apparently called the Jets about Wilson. We also talked to the Seahawks about Metcalf. Drafting our own guy was the best course of action given the required investment. Regardless now is the time for Bryce Young to produce. We are fourth amongst all teams in cap spending on the OL. Back to back first round picks at WR and multiple young TE draft picks now. Very solid and respectable backfield. New pieces across the defense. The time is now.
    • That was just the worst time to have their worst game of the season. One key deal was the broncos guess the Panthers would NOT change any plays or flow to the game. Another key point overlook that bronco defense was truly one of the best in the NFL history. It was the best defense the Panthers faced that year, by far. They were not ready for it, but broncos were ready for the Panthers. Mix in that bad luck, poor refs showcase, and this is the golden boys last game........ Panthers needed to win by 20 and the broncos defense was not going to allow that.  Panthers were the faviotes and I believe they also thought that it was going to easier than them destorying NFC playoff teams as they marched to the SB. I've heard darin Gantt say the play calls were to give remmers help, but for some reason the team never did it. During the year they never had that problem, so maybe never practiced giving help via TE/RB, or WR chip. Cam was superman that year, no need for any adjustments...... Until you meet a legendary defense with studs at all levels, Think about it, Peyton was throwing wingless dunks for the whole season, the defense had to carry his corpse to the SB. That's how good they were, no many defense are able to get to the playoffs and win a SB without decent QB play. If you recall the beginning of that denfese took Tim Teblows and his non-throwing arse to the playoffs couple years before. That's insane the level of defense needed to overcome.   
    • Who cares if he paid for such small benefits out of his own pocket? The NCAA is a joke. They need to be offering such anyway, especially for Uber rides (which actually seems like a good idea).
×
×
  • Create New...